vferrari
Silver Member
- Jul 19, 2015
- 4,910
- 8,377
- Detector(s) used
- XP Deus with HF/x35 Coils and Mi6 Pinpointer/ML Equinox 600/800/ML Tarsacci MDT 8000 GPX 4800/Garrett ATX/Fisher F75 DST/Tek G2+/Delta/Whites MXT/Nokta Simplex/Garrett Carrot
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
XP does not make a concentric coil. Would require a total overhaul of the their coil driver algorithms, I suspect. Although, they have been working on a deep seeking two-box coil, I suspect it could be done.
The advantages of the concentric coil, for the benefit of those who do not know, is that it is theoretically deeper than an equivalently sized DD coil if there is NO soil mineralization. That advantage drops off dramatically with increasing levels of mineralization in the soil. The nature of the concentric's EM field shape also makes it easier to pinpoint with and there are some detectors that excel at bottlecap rejection using concentric coils. These advantages are typically make a concentric coil a great contest coil but there is little overall advantage in the field. That may be why XP made the decision to not to design a concentric coil nor support it in their software. Just a guess.
The advantages of the concentric coil, for the benefit of those who do not know, is that it is theoretically deeper than an equivalently sized DD coil if there is NO soil mineralization. That advantage drops off dramatically with increasing levels of mineralization in the soil. The nature of the concentric's EM field shape also makes it easier to pinpoint with and there are some detectors that excel at bottlecap rejection using concentric coils. These advantages are typically make a concentric coil a great contest coil but there is little overall advantage in the field. That may be why XP made the decision to not to design a concentric coil nor support it in their software. Just a guess.
Last edited: