Cubfan64
Silver Member
- Feb 13, 2006
- 2,999
- 2,837
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher CZ21, Teknetics T2 & Minelab Sovereign GT
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
AU_Hunter said:As a reminder, I had previously e-mailed a staff archaeologist (Eric Blinman, webpage here: http://www.nmarchaeology.org/eric-blinman.html ) with the State of New Mexico's Office of Archaeological Studies, who denied any interest that his office had in that area. I also emailed a staff archaeologist with the Bureau of Land Management's Soccorro District, which has jurisdiction over federal lands in the area in question. Here is her reply:
"Hello – We’re sorry to have taken so long to get back to you! Thanks for your patience. As far as we know, these are as you suspected natural geological and topographical features. The mound builders among the prehistoric Native Americans did construct some amazing earthworks, but these are east of the Mississippi river. And yes, we do have archaeological interests in west central New Mexico, but these are “standard” archaeological remains – sites, trails, isolated artifacts, and protohistoric and historic village sites of modern Native Americans. But no earthworks in animal form or otherwise. I did take a quick peek at his site – I can’t say about the Adams diggings, but I’m certain that the earthworks are not manufactured by human agency (or aliens either for that matter…). If you are interested in the archaeological resources of west central New Mexico, there are many publications available out there, everything from technical reports to National Geographic, Arizona Highways, and New Mexico magazines. So thanks for your note, and I hope this answers your inquiry. Sincerely, Sara Stebbins."
Sara T Stebbins
Archaeologist
BLM, Socorro Field Office
901 S Highway 85
Socorro NM 87801
Phone: 575-838-1257
There are only two governmental agencies with jurisdiction over archaeological resources in the area in question, and neither of them are interested in any "animal effigies", and I can back that statement up with comments from real archaeologists, Eric Blinman and Sara Stebbins. Also, for the record, there are no National Parks Service lands near this area.
I don't understand why filemaker hasn't offerred at least a couple documented references for these professional folks who are interested in studying the area he mentions. With it being public knowledge now where they are located based on his maps and GE photos, there doesn't appear to be anything to hide. I would welcome a few professional contacts to talk with about the area and see what their thoughts are.