Mad Machinist
Silver Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2010
- Messages
- 3,147
- Reaction score
- 4,687
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Southeast Arizona
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
- #21
Thread Owner
I think that this technique wouldn't necessarily be better than using explosives, if you're licensed for it. The density of holes they show in that rock face is well beyond what you'd need for a typical double diamond drill pattern on the working face. Generally speaking, it looks like the drilling time is extensively beyond what I expect for blasting operations. When it comes to loading the holes and wiring the shot, I think you'd come out way ahead on time using explosives as well. That's just for drilling.
The actual breaking of the rock is going to eat a crap load of time with the hydraulic feathering.
Then there's the expenses to consider. How much does that rig cost? If you're doing 3-5x the number of holes, then expect that much more maintenance on your equipment. If you're in a water deprived area like I am, it's all that extra water for the drill rig that has to be hauled to the site. The road will get that much more maintenance as well.
Now if you're in an area close to residences or you've got a very dicey patch of gangue to work through, this might be the only way to go.
I don't know. It's a novel technique but it might be trying to invent the wheel.
If you haven't looked into what it takes to get and maintain a blasting license along with the requirements for transporting and storing explosives, you really should. I maintained a blasting license for years and it is a pain in the ass. There are no second chances if you mess up storing explosives. A lot of the violations end up with jail time, especially if explosives are missing or the paperwork gets screwed up and it looks like some are missing.
I rather buy a 1 9/16" SDS rotary hammer and drill more holes. Less chance of jail time that way and it makes hitting small pockets of high grade that much easier.