PBK said:
Such borders seem to have been fairly common on mid 19th century sporting buttons, which is what I believe this to be. See, for example, Rows II & III and some in Rows V-VII of Plate 290, p. 660, in Hughes & Lester's
The Big Book of Buttons.— or a number of those shown on the pages of sporting buttons beginning at:
http://www.onefivenine.info/buttons/button_gallery6.htm
Appearance wise I disagree, I
think it looks more like the Jackonsian type buttons, and the backmark design, which is hard to see in the photo, looks older than mid to late 1800's in my humble opinion.
Photograph not the best for true determination, but the rim seems more like a Jacksonian.
I spent a couple hours this afternoon, going thru my myrid of buttons and darn if I can locate any of the three I have, I overhauled this room earlier this month and now having problems finding a few things!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd96b/dd96bc49eb1f37e3d02d01e5a6154c865897f4ae" alt="Roll Eyes ::) ::)"
I would like to look at the back sides of my three to compare, and that would help. Again, the size did concern me, but not exactly sure what slightly smaller than a quarter equates to.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cef68/cef68ff51165074bece638c7c7a9e8773e1fbc92" alt="Smiley :) :)"
Either way, mid to late or early mid 1800's, the button is a good keeper!
Update: Since the backmark says Waterville the button cannot be earlier than 1847, so I will relent and submit that PBK is right and I am wrong on this one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db3cc/db3cc192adc8ba4cc49bbe3100b0c6ff4a356f7f" alt="crybaby2 :crybaby2: :crybaby2:"
However, my good friend Jimnot late 1800's . Waterville stopped using the name in 1860.
Anyway, look at these Jacksonian buttons, and you can see some beautiful pieces of artwork.
Don