Lets be real clear, mocking of members end or multiple members will find they lost the ability to post for months, cant be any clearer than that.
Lets be real clear, mocking of members end or multiple members will find they lost the ability to post for months, cant be any clearer than that.
"Luck overcomes Skill and Knowledge." Old quote from my Dad.I once searched for a gold and diamond ring for a fellow worker. He had me search through leaves over a foot deep in his yard and the pull tabs were pockets of them. Needless to say I did not find his ring but I had pockets full of beer tabs. I went to work the next morning. As my brother and I sat there I said to myself the ring could have been lost here at work instead of at his home eight miles away. I went and looked where he had parked the day before, another vehicle was there then and next to his driver's front tire lay the ring I had searched for with a metal detector tirelessly. Simply lying there on the asphalt like it was waiting to be found. He offered a reward but I did not except any. Later I bought the ring from him for $20 when he needed money till payday. I then gave it to my older brother for a birthday present. He had the ring resized and still has it. The point being treasure is not where you believe it to be sometimes it just takes LUCK.
1) Anyone that believes that WIKI is total correct, will also believe Used Car Salesmen. IMO
Wiki is not verified very well before it has been posted on. I treat it as if it were a forum. Lots of "I believe" this is the truth".
2) to anyone that claims they have solved the other 2 ciphers, post the names of the members of the party. Those names can then be verified by county deeds and historical documents, births, deaths, marriages, ect.
If one has solved the names then I can believe that they solved the location.
I know, no one is interested in the members names just the location of the treasure. If it had been me, I would have made the location cipher only breakable by using the names of the members, but that is just me.
Hi audigger53, My decipherment was copyrighted in 1999. I have C1 deciphered and still have not gotten to check out the area too well yet. Last time I was almost killed by untrustworthy partners. I also deciphered C3 with all thirty of the associates name, their locations and to whom they wanted their share to go to. At the end of C3 it says, "and your share." Which was referring to Robert Morriss. I also have deciphered C2 again to check for correctness and I have deciphered C4 which are the two small pieces of paper found in the iron box by Pauline Innis.
Are you claiming that Forest Fenn is part of this great treasure conspiracy?...
This particular file was in their folders for a particular reason......can any of you figure it out?
Its something I don't think I have seen here anywhere but is an attachment to be pondered...as it relates to another "Treasure Map" altogether....
View attachment 1510036
Was the NSA concerned with a few fiction ciphers? They were able to take notice of this one...
LOL! LGA!Are you claiming that Forest Fenn is part of this great treasure conspiracy?
Oh, SHUT UP, already! YOUR Sarcasm is wearing VERY thin!
I can find evidence, like "TJB", in the skin of a golf ball if I wanted to waste my time connecting all of those dots. Apparently I could then say that a golf course is part of the treasure map and that the inventor of the golf ball was also part of the grand conspiracy.![]()
But that's just it. It isn't sarcasm. Just look through some of these threads over the years at all of the references to the alleged "TJB's" being found everywhere. The stars, the landscapes, documents, pictures, and the list goes on and on. There's no rules against me pointing that out. There is, however, rules against screaming at other mebers and telling them to sut up. But, unlike some others here, I can handle it so I won't cry to the mods about it.
Yep! The Beale and Lost Dutchman are the same.Well, EVERYONE can go home, now... CLASS DISMISSED!
3. Analysis of the language used by the author of the pamphlet (the uses of punctuation, relative clauses, infinitives, conjunc andtives, and so on) has detected significant correlations between it and Beale's letters, including the plaintext of the second cipher, suggesting that they may have been written by the same person.