HMS Victory- update

[VOC]

You can see it's not about UCH protection for these idiots it's all about pro socialist/communist politics http://thepipeline.info/blog/2015/03/13/new-omex-mhf-poster-campaign-launched/

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[Jolly Mon]

You can see it's not about UCH protection for these idiots it's all about pro socialist/communist politics thePipeLine | NEW OMEX MHF POSTER CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED

They would rather see artifacts destroyed and priceless archaeological information lost than see a commercial interest take part in the recovery. Their position has NOTHING to do with archaeology or English cultural heritage.

To illustrate the quality of The Pipeline, they actually quote from the Yahoo Finance Message Board in their March 5th Victory story !!! LOL !!!

 

[AUVnav]

[h=2]Kevan Jones Shadow Minister (Defence) 20th March 2015[/h]To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 16 March 2015 to Question 226869, for what reasons the Answer stated that approval for the Maritime Heritage Foundation to manage the site of HMS Victory 1744 has not been removed, when in his letter of 27 February 2015 to Lord Lingfield he stated that he had decided to withdraw that approval.


[h=2]Philip Dunne The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence 20th March 2015[/h]
The letter of 27 February 2015 from my right Hon. Friend, the Defence Secretary, to Lord Lingfield concerns the withdrawal of the approval to recover at risk surface artefacts from the site of HMS Victory 1744, not the Maritime Heritage Foundation's management of the wreck site itself. The letter also made clear that the related issues raised in a Judicial Review application, that has now been withdrawn, are being considered by officials; it would therefore be inappropriate to comment until this process is concluded.