SpiritRelic
Hero Member
- Sep 16, 2012
- 899
- 117
All i know is i did my research.And the main thing was,the beach,the salt,the water can be a very harsh environment for a metal detector.So the warranty is nice. B-)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I found that both the Whites DF and the Garrett Sea Hunter had a bit more depth than the Sand Shark, but the DF has a harder time on high black sand/salt beaches on the west coast. It's just too unstable. That's why I bought the Sea Hunter, it works better than either of the other two in the really high black sand, and goes deeper than the Sand Shark by 2-3" here. Florida may be different though. However, the Sand Shark runs a bit smoother than the other two, probably due to a lower signal strength. None of the three behave the same..
BTW, I didn't even give Detector Pro a second thought.. and the Sea Hunter is built like a Sherman tank, only a lot smaller, and it goes deeper than any multi or single freq detector I've ever owned..
Larry
I have not used the Infinium. In my world PI's have a limited use, mostly for big open areas such as fields and wet salt beaches. I know that the Sea Hunter is preferred over the Infinium on www.meteldetecttorreviews.net. That says a lot by itself. I have found more coins, more jewelry, more everything of value with my old and ancient Tesoro Silver Sabre on Oregon beaches than with anything else, even though the Sea Hunter searches deeper. The depth on the Silver Sabre was maxed out at a mere 8" for a clad quarter too. Sometimes "simple", yet old, works better than complex and new. Personally, I think the Sea Hunter is one of the best detectors made, along with the Whites Surfmasters. You can read my review of the Surfmaster in the above mentioned site. The SH is heavy, but so are most other PI's. Would I buy an Infinium? Well, no, but I wouldn't buy a TDI either, even though I can afford one. I prefer the light weight of the old Surfmasters over both of them, but the SH goes deeper than the Surfmaster so it is my preference. I mostly prefer the Sea Hunter because it is so well-mannered, not having to be watched or fooled with so much. I chose an atomic clock over one that has to be rewound daily too.. I don't hear people complaining about the Sea Hunter leaking, but I do about the TDI, the Infinium, and the Dual Field. The Sand Shark has few complaints except for lack of depth. Mostly people like it because it runs very smoothly.
Because people complain too much about the Infinium being unstable in wave action, I would rather have the safe and trustworthy Sea Hunter, even though I don't surf search. I like wet sand hunting better mostly because of our Oregon "sneaker waves" that can weigh us down with sand and kill us in less than 3 minutes, since we can quickly weigh 400 pounds with all the sand in our clothing. It's happened here several times, mostly to Californians and people from other countries. I never turn my back on the ocean here, and I always make sure that there is no cliff to climb if one of those waves comes up from below rushing in on me..
If you find two of the (original) Surfmasters, please give me a shout. Thanks db. Larry
terry your super trax by tesoro
give me a break
tesoro is a first Texas instrument along with fisher bounty hunter and tecnektics...
it doe's operate high enough to fine the good stuff a true gold detector will find
I own several machines and the deepest land Detector is my Minelab Sovereign GT..I have dug 16"+ using the 15" WOT Coil to bring up a sparkler wire..Also the Whites PI Dual Field,,it's a deep Pulse machine with average depth of 16" to 18" deep...There are NO coil problems floating up away from the target as mentioned,several aftermarket sell a clip on piece to keep the coil down ,also Anderson Shafts sells the piece..Tesoro Tiger Shark...It's just an All Out Great machine,,fully waterproof to 200FT and lifetime warranty..It is not as deep as my Sovereign or Whites PI but I've dug a quarter at 14" in sand..I mainly hunt beach here in Canada and fresh water...I would recommend any of these 3 machines but All do their own thing and it depends what you want the detector for,,everyone is different ..First, welcome to TNet.
I have used the Sand Shark and the other Whites PI's but not the Dual Field at a saltwater beach yet. I can tell you that I much prefer the Tesoro Sand Shark for a couple reasons. Unless the Dual Field has the orange O ring, it will leak down the road. I've never even heard of the Tiger or Sand Shark leaking. Batteries seem to last forever in the Tesoro.
Biggest thing you need to worry about is the Coil on the Whites. Whites water machines coils are light weight for the majority of hunters that hunt the dry sand and they float like a cork in the wet. Doesn't matter if Freshwater where it wouldn't float as much or salt water where it will float more. They are advertised as "near Neutral Buoyant" but they all float unless you have the sinking model coil installed. Other manufactures like Fisher, Minelab or Tesoro don't seem to have coils that float and I can't understand why Whites still has this problem.
Bottom line, the Dual Field is nice, but if you have to work at holding down the coil it isn't worth the money. Sorry.....