Dowsing, Secrets Revealed

aarthrj3811 said:
Darn Jean....We shot those Media Events down months ago.

http://www.randi.org/research/faq.html#1.5

1.5. How many people have passed the formal test?
No one has ever taken the formal test, as one must first pass the preliminary test.
SOME ONE IS WRONG

PLEASE NOTE!!!

When Art says "shot down" what he really means is he doesn't want to admit and can't understand that the Randi challenge is perfectly fair, so he's going to attempt to cast dispersion on the challenge because he is too afraid to take himself. ;D ;D ;D
 

No af1733...Just pointing to the facts....Are you telling us that Randi's Web site is wrong or has someone taken the final test....Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Darn Jean....We shot those Media Events down months ago.

http://www.randi.org/research/faq.html#1.5

1.5. How many people have passed the formal test?
No one has ever taken the formal test, as one must first pass the preliminary test.
SOME ONE IS WRONG

Very funny. Are you telling me the video I just pointed you to is a fake?

I see what 1.5 says..... I also saw the video of Randi holding a check for $10K , and this faker attempting to do something he couldn't. Had he been able to do it, I expect Randi would've paid him on the spot.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
No af1733...Just pointing to the facts....Are you telling us that Randi's Web site is wrong or has someone taken the final test....Art
It's been explained and repeated to you that the preliminary test was not always a required element of the challenge, but was instituted once the $1,000,000 was made the final award, mostly to keep out the fruitcakes and save the JREF time.

But no one blames you for not wanting to attempt the challenge, Art. I know I wouldn't want to be publicly humiliated like that. Just keep up your repetitive excuses and you'll never have to worry about it.
 

Jean310 said:
Here is an example of a dowser who took the preliminary test, but didn't pass it.

http://www.tampabayskeptics.org/v13n1rpt.html#dowser

Here is another one.

http://www.tampabayskeptics.org/Moore_chall.html

I think you have to get past the preliminary test, to show you can do what you claim. These people couldn't pass the preliminary test.
Nice vids, but I'm afraid they will fall on blind eyes and deaf ears dealing with Art like this, Jean. It's unfortunate, but the ones claiming to be the most open-minded are also the most ignorant to the truth.

By the way, I know your avatar is the actress on NUMB3RS, but I'm just going to go ahead and imagine it's you, okay? ;D
 

af1733 said:
By the way, I know your avatar is the actress on NUMB3RS, but I'm just going to go ahead and imagine it's you, okay? ;D

That's cool........... I'm sure Diane won't mind, and neither do I.
 

No af1733...Just pointing to the facts....Are you telling us that Randi's Web site is wrong or has someone taken the final test....Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
No af1733...Just pointing to the facts....Are you telling us that Randi's Web site is wrong or has someone taken the final test....Art

Art no one has taken the final test because they ALL FAILED THE PRELIMINARY TEST. Since you're a dowser, the convenient take on that is that it's rigged. The only problem is that you refuse to believe that there's a possibility that *gasp*, dowsing may just not work.
 

Art no one has taken the final test because they ALL FAILED THE PRELIMINARY TEST. Since you're a dowser, the convenient take on that is that it's rigged. The only problem is that you refuse to believe that there's a possibility that *gasp*, dowsing may just not work.
Gee xupz....There is a thread called Why Dowsing doesn't work....I don't see any information about why dowsing doesn't work on it ...If it may not work please tell us WHY...Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Art no one has taken the final test because they ALL FAILED THE PRELIMINARY TEST. Since you're a dowser, the convenient take on that is that it's rigged. The only problem is that you refuse to believe that there's a possibility that *gasp*, dowsing may just not work.
Gee xupz....There is a thread called Why Dowsing doesn't work....I don't see any information about why dowsing doesn't work on it ...If it may not work please tell us WHY...Art

You haven't proven it works to begin with, so any information to disprove something that hasn't been proven is moot. How about someone start a thread "Dowsing Works" and we can read all your wonderful replies full of information on why it works. The dowsing rod swings both ways.
 

Hey SWR...You seem to post a lot about about Dowsing..How about letting us know the secrets you know...You must know something or you would not be making smart remarks all the time...Art
 

xupz....My prove and thoughts are all over this forum....It seems the skeptics do not have any proof so they are begging the Dowsers to help them. Forget the math problems and give us one reason why Dowsing doesn't work...Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
xupz....My prove and thoughts are all over this forum....It seems the skeptics do not have any proof so they are begging the Dowsers to help them. Forget the math problems and give us one reason why Dowsing doesn't work...Art

Delusions extend quite far ;)
 

aarthrj3811 said:
xupz....My prove and thoughts are all over this forum....It seems the skeptics do not have any proof so they are begging the Dowsers to help them. Forget the math problems and give us one reason why Dowsing doesn't work...Art

You know, Art.... anyone (me included) could come here "cold", having no particular feeling about if dowsing really worked or not; and after reading no more than two days worth of your postings, they would know for sure that dowsing was a totally worthless and time wasting endeavor.

You've given me the best reasons I could ever imagine why dowsing doesn't work. (You and Mike(Mont))

You need look no further for the reasons, just look in a mirror.
 

You know, Art.... anyone (me included) could come here "cold", having no particular feeling about if dowsing really worked or not; and after reading no more than two days worth of your postings, they would know for sure that dowsing was a totally worthless and time wasting endeavor.

You've given me the best reasons I could ever imagine why dowsing doesn't work. (You and Mike(Mont))

You need look no further for the reasons, just look in a mirror.

Great Logic....I just love it when people keep giving NON answers....Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
xupz....My prove and thoughts are all over this forum....It seems the skeptics do not have any proof so they are begging the Dowsers to help them. Forget the math problems and give us one reason why Dowsing doesn't work...Art
You want proof, Art? How about this? There is absolutely no reason dowsing should work. Does that confuse you? It should, but not because it's any kind of complex thought, the type you are unable to grasp.

There is no reason dowsing should work at all. Pick any object you see around you, and there is a reason it should work.

A pencil? It should work because we know graphite leaves grey marks on paper, and so graphite was inserted into a wooden handle, and the pencil was born.

A vacuum cleaner should work because we know that a motor creates a suction, so slap a filter and bag over the motor intake, and we have a vacuum!

But dowsing..... Why should dowsing work? The rods don't have any physical features that would cause them to function they way you say they do. They aren't magnetic in a lot of rods, they don't have a receiver on them. In fact, you can't seem to get two dowsers to agree on anything when it comes to dowsing's causes.

I don't know about you, but when every single dowser has their own theory on why dowsing works, that should set off an alarm bell that there may be a problem. No one disagrees on why a pencil or vacuum cleaner works, and if there was a reason dowsing should work, no one would disagree about that, either.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top