That most would does not make them right.
Many things have general definitions, but escape the full understanding of those who would have us call them experts. Hypnosis and gravity are two big examples that come to mind. So-called experts mock hypnosis, and other so-called experts state they don't really know what gravity is.
My strong suspicion is, someday, gravity experts will discover magnetics, figure out everything has polarity, compliments of the mass from which it is composed (explaining why the moon is attracted to earth, and affects our tides (it, probably, is that blasted magnetic water)).
I haven't dabbled with dowsing since I was a LITTLE kid, nearly 70 years ago, so I am far from an expert. That said, there are many wells out there that exist by way of someone who believed in dowsing. Regarding that, it's not likely magic, and no one knows what the human mind is capable of.
Most doctors can't even figure out ascorbic acid, passed as vitamin C, will not cure scurvy, while the C in a potato will [as, of course, will limes] because of the other things in the potatoes that work with the C.
Doctors not owned by big pharma recognize their knowledge is far more limited than the AMA and others would have us believe. For example, many doctors recognize some people are more susceptible to flux lines, EMF and what have you, while most are wholly unaware of its presence.
Science barely knows about or understands the mind. They do not know what signals it can send or receive (Einstein said most ideas are floating about us, we just have to reach out and grasp them). They cannot explain the seemingly infinite coincidences that do or may suggest we can do far more than the experts believe.
In the end, it remains, chasing electrical lines, detecting and dowsing involve signals. It is indisputable the former involve injecting signals that are highly affected by ground conditions (e.g., conductivity, near by signal generating devices) that require understanding that is as much art as it is rules of known physics.
Many things have general definitions, but escape the full understanding of those who would have us call them experts. Hypnosis and gravity are two big examples that come to mind. So-called experts mock hypnosis, and other so-called experts state they don't really know what gravity is.
My strong suspicion is, someday, gravity experts will discover magnetics, figure out everything has polarity, compliments of the mass from which it is composed (explaining why the moon is attracted to earth, and affects our tides (it, probably, is that blasted magnetic water)).
I haven't dabbled with dowsing since I was a LITTLE kid, nearly 70 years ago, so I am far from an expert. That said, there are many wells out there that exist by way of someone who believed in dowsing. Regarding that, it's not likely magic, and no one knows what the human mind is capable of.
Most doctors can't even figure out ascorbic acid, passed as vitamin C, will not cure scurvy, while the C in a potato will [as, of course, will limes] because of the other things in the potatoes that work with the C.
Doctors not owned by big pharma recognize their knowledge is far more limited than the AMA and others would have us believe. For example, many doctors recognize some people are more susceptible to flux lines, EMF and what have you, while most are wholly unaware of its presence.
Science barely knows about or understands the mind. They do not know what signals it can send or receive (Einstein said most ideas are floating about us, we just have to reach out and grasp them). They cannot explain the seemingly infinite coincidences that do or may suggest we can do far more than the experts believe.
In the end, it remains, chasing electrical lines, detecting and dowsing involve signals. It is indisputable the former involve injecting signals that are highly affected by ground conditions (e.g., conductivity, near by signal generating devices) that require understanding that is as much art as it is rules of known physics.