R
Rennwaggen
Guest
What would constitute PROOF of a KGC treasure in YOUR mind?
This isn't a thread for booksellers. If you want to hawk your wares, this ain't the place, go and find your naive marks elsewhere.
What I want to know is quite simple, and it may be that my standards of proof don't agree with the other folks here so I'll explain what I see as proof.
To me, PROOF means something TANGIBLE! You can see it. You can feel it with your hands, not your heart or mind.
Proof is not a 150 year old paper that can neither be proven or disproven.
Proof is not a 150 year old story that has been handed down for at least 4 generations, with all the inaccuracies that it entails.
Proof is not an allegation that a large part of the Confederate treasury did not make the entire trip it was supposed to. Those people are dead. You can't call them to account for their statements.
On the other hand,
Proof IS a photograph of the treasure before it is removed with or without the one who found it.
Proof IS a photograph of the place the treasure was removed from with or without the one who found it.
Proof IS copies of the documentation you used to locate the treasure, as in "this is how to find it".
Proof IS the documentation that led you to a treasure that someone else had already taken -- along with pictures of where the treasure HAD BEEN.
Somebody prove me a liar when I say that these types of treasures do not exist. I would like to believe the stories I read, the legends I hear, and the signs that others tell me about as well as those I have personally seen.
Just seeing signs is not proof. Anyone like me could have made them so that you could spend your life running in circles. I love to stir things up, as you can see from my posts. I know I'm not the only one who would get a big laugh out of something like that.
The outboard motor is firmly attached to the cesspool, the starter is engaged, let's stir some crap!
This isn't a thread for booksellers. If you want to hawk your wares, this ain't the place, go and find your naive marks elsewhere.
What I want to know is quite simple, and it may be that my standards of proof don't agree with the other folks here so I'll explain what I see as proof.
To me, PROOF means something TANGIBLE! You can see it. You can feel it with your hands, not your heart or mind.
Proof is not a 150 year old paper that can neither be proven or disproven.
Proof is not a 150 year old story that has been handed down for at least 4 generations, with all the inaccuracies that it entails.
Proof is not an allegation that a large part of the Confederate treasury did not make the entire trip it was supposed to. Those people are dead. You can't call them to account for their statements.
On the other hand,
Proof IS a photograph of the treasure before it is removed with or without the one who found it.
Proof IS a photograph of the place the treasure was removed from with or without the one who found it.
Proof IS copies of the documentation you used to locate the treasure, as in "this is how to find it".
Proof IS the documentation that led you to a treasure that someone else had already taken -- along with pictures of where the treasure HAD BEEN.
Somebody prove me a liar when I say that these types of treasures do not exist. I would like to believe the stories I read, the legends I hear, and the signs that others tell me about as well as those I have personally seen.
Just seeing signs is not proof. Anyone like me could have made them so that you could spend your life running in circles. I love to stir things up, as you can see from my posts. I know I'm not the only one who would get a big laugh out of something like that.
The outboard motor is firmly attached to the cesspool, the starter is engaged, let's stir some crap!