Do The Math!

[EE THr]

~EE~

Oh! Now I get it!
Your LRLs actually work better under adverse conditions!
The more interference and false indications there are, the more "treasure" you find.
And just because the things don't work at all under ideal conditions, just doesn't mean a thing.
Wowie! Why didn't you just say that in the first place?

..Your understanding of idea conditions are different from mine.

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?

Treasure is where you find it..any Treasure Hunter knows that..So the idea condition would be to put yourself in the right location by using research , common sense, and your knowledge of what you are seeking..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?

Treasure is where you find it..any Treasure Hunter knows that..So the idea condition would be to put yourself in the right location by using research , common sense, and your knowledge of what you are seeking..Art

Trouble is, con-artie, a person can do all that, without any magic, fantasy, LRL!


And for the gazillionth time, you failed to answer the question, and used your usual Straw Man Fallacy tactics, which by now is totally obvious, and you don't even care anymore that you are exposing yourself as a con-man.

You pulled the same BS when whining about the double-blind tests, and I asked you to write a procedure for one which you felt was fair. That never happened, did it. Because your whining was all fake. You know that the tests are fair, but that you can't make your fantasy LRL find anything, under any circumstances. Well, that is unless you already know where it is because you put it there!

And now, when you are whining about "ideal conditions" being a bad thing (how dumb can you get?), you just try to skip over the "conditions" like I never mentioned it.

Artie, you are so phony, I'm surprised that you can look at yourself in the mirror. I guess you are proud of being a crook. Oh well, at least now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all. Thanks.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

~EE~

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?

Treasure is where you find it..any Treasure Hunter knows that..So the idea condition would be to put yourself in the right location by using research , common sense, and your knowledge of what you are seeking..Art

Trouble is, con-artie, a person can do all that, without any magic, fantasy, LRL!


And for the gazillionth time, you failed to answer the question, and used your usual Straw Man Fallacy tactics, which by now is totally obvious, and you don't even care anymore that you are exposing yourself as a con-man.

You pulled the same BS when whining about the double-blind tests, and I asked you to write a procedure for one which you felt was fair. That never happened, did it. Because your whining was all fake. You know that the tests are fair, but that you can't make your fantasy LRL find anything, under any circumstances. Well, that is unless you already know where it is because you put it there!

And now, when you are whining about "ideal conditions" being a bad thing (how dumb can you get?), you just try to skip over the "conditions" like I never mentioned it.

Artie, you are so phony, I'm surprised that you can look at yourself in the mirror. I guess you are proud of being a crook. Oh well, at least now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all. Thanks.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Why do you keep calling Art a con man? To my knowledge he isn't selling anything on here. And now you are calling him a crook. Tell us...what has he stolen?

I'll tell you what I'm seeing. You don't agree with Art, so you resort to calling him names. All because you don't believe what he says. Well, whoop de doo.... I don't believe you (and never have) when you claim to be an EE. That is a load of mushroom dirt, most definitely. And the way you carry on about videos not being proof, and then post videos (denouncing psychology) as proof of your little beliefs is laughable at best. I'm inclined to think that Fenix is right. You had a bad experience with a psychologist at some point in the past.....or perhaps....in the present.

For crying out loud...if you don't believe in LRL's, if the topic offends you so much, then just turn off the computer or go to another website. But my guess is you won't, because you enjoy starting arguments too much.

And now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all.

Thanks.

BTW...there are two questions in this post. Will you answer them?

 

[fenixdigger]

Eddie;

Stevie Wonder could see what's up with these guys. That's why I made The 10,001 Posts Prediction. I looked back at how they were acting and saw psychological indicators shining like beacons. They have no choice but to continue that path.

They may drift slightly trying to convince themselves otherwise but count on most posts being mainly transference laced with insults,
name calling, ridicule, demands, self righteousness, subject changing, and feigned ignorance. Just look at the cute list EE made. He follows it religiously and accuses everyone he disagrees with doing it. Transference in it's classic form.

Do they try to help anyone with anything? Not a chance. On the bright side, if they couldn't come here and release these inner
demons, they would be out among people wound tight and spaced loose. The danger would likely fall to a vulnerable age group.
So in a sense we are protecting others.

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?

Treasure is where you find it..any Treasure Hunter knows that..So the idea condition would be to put yourself in the right location by using research , common sense, and your knowledge of what you are seeking..Art

Trouble is, con-artie, a person can do all that, without any magic, fantasy, LRL!


And for the gazillionth time, you failed to answer the question, and used your usual Straw Man Fallacy tactics, which by now is totally obvious, and you don't even care anymore that you are exposing yourself as a con-man.

You pulled the same BS when whining about the double-blind tests, and I asked you to write a procedure for one which you felt was fair. That never happened, did it. Because your whining was all fake. You know that the tests are fair, but that you can't make your fantasy LRL find anything, under any circumstances. Well, that is unless you already know where it is because you put it there!

And now, when you are whining about "ideal conditions" being a bad thing (how dumb can you get?), you just try to skip over the "conditions" like I never mentioned it.

Artie, you are so phony, I'm surprised that you can look at yourself in the mirror. I guess you are proud of being a crook. Oh well, at least now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all. Thanks.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Why do you keep calling Art a con man? To my knowledge he isn't selling anything on here. And now you are calling him a crook. Tell us...what has he stolen?

I'll tell you what I'm seeing. You don't agree with Art, so you resort to calling him names. All because you don't believe what he says. Well, whoop de doo.... I don't believe you (and never have) when you claim to be an EE. That is a load of mushroom dirt, most definitely. And the way you carry on about videos not being proof, and then post videos (denouncing psychology) as proof of your little beliefs is laughable at best. I'm inclined to think that Fenix is right. You had a bad experience with a psychologist at some point in the past.....or perhaps....in the present.

For crying out loud...if you don't believe in LRL's, if the topic offends you so much, then just turn off the computer or go to another website. But my guess is you won't, because you enjoy starting arguments too much.

And now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all.

Thanks.

BTW...there are two questions in this post. Will you answer them?

Eddie---

I have said so many times on here why I call artie a con man, that only a moron would ask. But if you insist on my stating it once again, it's because he has done everythin on the list of con artists. If you disagree with the list I made, then which ones do you think aren't among the traits of a scammer? You can take each one individually, and say that it doesn't mean the person doing that is a con artist, and you would be right. However, the more things a person does, that's on the list, the more they are behaving like one, until at a certain point, they simply are one. If if walks like a duck....

About my "crook" remark, you should have looked up the definition of the word before you went spouting off about that, because your question is irrelevant. If you already know the definition, then you are trying to pull a Straw Man Fallacy, just like con-artie tried.

Videos showing someone supposedly locating something with phony device, wouldn't hold up as proof in any fair court in the World, and if you don't know that, then you need to grow up.

The video I posted lists all the proof: Names, dates, institutions, and documents. These can all be checked, and proven to be either true or false. I wouldn't post a video that would show false information, exactly because of that. But you are claiming it to be false, even though you never bothered to check any of the references which are given throughout that video. That makes you a real slimeball.

You were doing pretty good at being rational and honest, there for awhile, since you gave real answers to the questions LRLers won't answer. But now you are going off the deep end. Sorry, but it is what it is.

Like I have said many times before, and keep having to repeat (so please get this, and get it straight), I have never insulted anyone on here first. If you think I have, just go back and quote it, then. Just because these twerps can dish it out, but can't take it, is not my fault. So they have no reason to keep whining about that. To prove my point, just start a topic of, "No Insults Discussion of LRLs," and see what happens. Otherwise stuff it.

And I have never started an argument on here. If anyone cares to look back to my first posts in the LRL section, you will see that I began by simply asking a few questions. When the LRLers saw how illogical they were being, they began their substitution of insults for answers, and have continued that pattern ever since. So who's fault is that?

This section is for the discussion of LRLs. That's what I'm doing, except when the LRLers turn the discussions into childish nonsense, of which there is plenty to quote, but you can just review any thread in this section to see it for yourself.

And I don't see you complaining that con-artie didn't answer my last question.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

~EE~

OK. So what, exactly, is your version of "ideal conditions"?

Treasure is where you find it..any Treasure Hunter knows that..So the idea condition would be to put yourself in the right location by using research , common sense, and your knowledge of what you are seeking..Art

Trouble is, con-artie, a person can do all that, without any magic, fantasy, LRL!


And for the gazillionth time, you failed to answer the question, and used your usual Straw Man Fallacy tactics, which by now is totally obvious, and you don't even care anymore that you are exposing yourself as a con-man.

You pulled the same BS when whining about the double-blind tests, and I asked you to write a procedure for one which you felt was fair. That never happened, did it. Because your whining was all fake. You know that the tests are fair, but that you can't make your fantasy LRL find anything, under any circumstances. Well, that is unless you already know where it is because you put it there!

And now, when you are whining about "ideal conditions" being a bad thing (how dumb can you get?), you just try to skip over the "conditions" like I never mentioned it.

Artie, you are so phony, I'm surprised that you can look at yourself in the mirror. I guess you are proud of being a crook. Oh well, at least now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all. Thanks.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Why do you keep calling Art a con man? To my knowledge he isn't selling anything on here. And now you are calling him a crook. Tell us...what has he stolen?

I'll tell you what I'm seeing. You don't agree with Art, so you resort to calling him names. All because you don't believe what he says. Well, whoop de doo.... I don't believe you (and never have) when you claim to be an EE. That is a load of mushroom dirt, most definitely. And the way you carry on about videos not being proof, and then post videos (denouncing psychology) as proof of your little beliefs is laughable at best. I'm inclined to think that Fenix is right. You had a bad experience with a psychologist at some point in the past.....or perhaps....in the present.

For crying out loud...if you don't believe in LRL's, if the topic offends you so much, then just turn off the computer or go to another website. But my guess is you won't, because you enjoy starting arguments too much.

And now everybody knows it, because you have shown that to us all.

Thanks.

BTW...there are two questions in this post. Will you answer them?

Eddie---

I have said so many times on here why I call artie a con man, that only a moron would ask. But if you insist on my stating it once again, it's because he has done everythin on the list of con artists. If you disagree with the list I made, then which ones do you think aren't among the traits of a scammer? You can take each one individually, and say that it doesn't mean the person doing that is a con artist, and you would be right. However, the more things a person does, that's on the list, the more they are behaving like one, until at a certain point, they simply are one. If if walks like a duck....

About my "crook" remark, you should have looked up the definition of the word before you went spouting off about that, because your question is irrelevant. If you already know the definition, then you are trying to pull a Straw Man Fallacy, just like con-artie tried.

Videos showing someone supposedly locating something with phony device, wouldn't hold up as proof in any fair court in the World, and if you don't know that, then you need to grow up.

The video I posted lists all the proof: Names, dates, institutions, and documents. These can all be checked, and proven to be either true or false. I wouldn't post a video that would show false information, exactly because of that. But you are claiming it to be false, even though you never bothered to check any of the references which are given throughout that video. That makes you a real slimeball.

You were doing pretty good at being rational and honest, there for awhile, since you gave real answers to the questions LRLers won't answer. But now you are going off the deep end. Sorry, but it is what it is.

Like I have said many times before, and keep having to repeat (so please get this, and get it straight), I have never insulted anyone on here first. If you think I have, just go back and quote it, then. Just because these twerps can dish it out, but can't take it, is not my fault. So they have no reason to keep whining about that. To prove my point, just start a topic of, "No Insults Discussion of LRLs," and see what happens. Otherwise stuff it.

And I have never started an argument on here. If anyone cares to look back to my first posts in the LRL section, you will see that I began by simply asking a few questions. When the LRLers saw how illogical they were being, they began their substitution of insults for answers, and have continued that pattern ever since. So who's fault is that?

This section is for the discussion of LRLs. That's what I'm doing, except when the LRLers turn the discussions into childish nonsense, of which there is plenty to quote, but you can just review any thread in this section to see it for yourself.

And I don't see you complaining that con-artie didn't answer my last question.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Thank you. You just proved something for me.

Are you really so blind that you don't understand that the way you word many of your posts can be construed as insulting? I think not. I think it's intentional.

Interesting that as long as my answers to your questions went along with what you believed, then they were rational and honest....but as soon as I put up something you don't like, I'm "going off the deep end". I wonder what your doc would say about that?

Get things straight. I can care less if you believe me about anything. You have proven yourself (to me) that you are only here to instigate trouble. All because you don't agree with someone.

Geez. Get a life, you are pathetic.

As for your taking your video as gospel......there are plenty of videos, books, reports, etc that state all kinds of wacky things. There are videos with convincing evidence that we never went to the moon, for instance. Tell me, do you believe in UFO's? (legitimate question)

Now for your list. I've said it before, so here goes again. Your list is nothing more than a model of human nature with your own words thrown in. What you did was study the posts here and write the list based on the posts that occurred BEFORE your list was compiled. So you are doing things backward. The list should have been first, and the patterns emerge in the postings to prove it. But instead, you just wrote your list to cover every contingency of argument against it. So, in essence, your list was created to stir up arguments, and that is the only reason.

If you don't believe me about your list being based on human nature, change the words around. Instead of CA, use whatever term you are calling yourself today. Instead of LRL, maybe use "scientific method" or something that you believe in. Then go back over the posts and see if the shoes haven't been put on different feet.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey EddiR and fenixdigger..All we can do is put information on this board that may help Treasure Hunters..These Skeptics and their “Clones” refuse to learn anything….As you have said many times LT..Do a little experimenting and learn the truth unless you are afraid of the truth..Art

 

[EddieR]

Thank you. You just proved something for me.

Are you really so blind that you don't understand that the way you word many of your posts can be construed as insulting? I think not. I think it's intentional.

Interesting that as long as my answers to your questions went along with what you believed, then they were rational and honest....but as soon as I put up something you don't like, I'm "going off the deep end". I wonder what your doc would say about that?

Get things straight. I can care less if you believe me about anything. You have proven yourself (to me) that you are only here to instigate trouble. All because you don't agree with someone.

Geez. Get a life, you are pathetic.

As for your taking your video as gospel......there are plenty of videos, books, reports, etc that state all kinds of wacky things. There are videos with convincing evidence that we never went to the moon, for instance. Tell me, do you believe in UFO's? (legitimate question)

Now for your list. I've said it before, so here goes again. Your list is nothing more than a model of human nature with your own words thrown in. What you did was study the posts here and write the list based on the posts that occurred BEFORE your list was compiled. So you are doing things backward. The list should have been first, and the patterns emerge in the postings to prove it. But instead, you just wrote your list to cover every contingency of argument against it. So, in essence, your list was created to stir up arguments, and that is the only reason.

If you don't believe me about your list being based on human nature, change the words around. Instead of CA, use whatever term you are calling yourself today. Instead of LRL, maybe use "scientific method" or something that you believe in. Then go back over the posts and see if the shoes haven't been put on different feet.

Whoa....even a better example of a hypocrite!

Don't try this at home folks....only a trained professional can disguise a public lambasting as a personal attack.

You call that a personal attack....and in the same post you call me a hypocrite. In the same post, you posted a personal attack yourself.

Get a life.

 

[EddieR]

Eddie;

Stevie Wonder could see what's up with these guys. That's why I made The 10,001 Posts Prediction. I looked back at how they were acting and saw psychological indicators shining like beacons. They have no choice but to continue that path.

They may drift slightly trying to convince themselves otherwise but count on most posts being mainly transference laced with insults,
name calling, ridicule, demands, self righteousness, subject changing, and feigned ignorance. Just look at the cute list EE made. He follows it religiously and accuses everyone he disagrees with doing it. Transference in it's classic form.

Do they try to help anyone with anything? Not a chance. On the bright side, if they couldn't come here and release these inner
demons, they would be out among people wound tight and spaced loose. The danger would likely fall to a vulnerable age group.
So in a sense we are protecting others.

:::chotles::: this is what is known as a 'tag-a-long' lambaste....hides behind the original lambasting, as if they are adding something to the ruckus. However, they are simply adding to the personal attack

And you are what's known as a "tag along bully"... hiding behind the other guys...then running out to take a jab at the opposition, then running back behind the other guys' coattails....and thinking they are adding something to the ruckus. However, you are simply adding.....nothing of any worth.

Instead of making goofy comments that are dead in the water, why not try some of the experiments that the others have posted here. You might be surprised.

Perhaps you were already surprised....and just won't admit it?

 

[EE THr]

Are you really so blind that you don't understand that the way you word many of your posts can be construed as insulting? I think not. I think it's intentional.

Huh? Who says I'm trying to hide my insults? When someone insults me, I have the right to insult them back. That's life, get used to it, and quit whining about it. Or you stop insulting people. I see you couldn't answer my challenge to show where I ever insulted anyone first. So suck it up.

Interesting that as long as my answers to your questions went along with what you believed, then they were rational and honest....but as soon as I put up something you don't like, I'm "going off the deep end". I wonder what your doc would say about that?

Ah, you must be PMing with Broom Hilda! This isn't a sick-ology forum, and pea brains like you shouldn't be practicing without a license. It has nothing to do with what I "believe," Sherlock, it has to do with what sane people call "facts." Of course, that doesn't mean much to you and your sick-ology friends, who don't believe in reality.

Get things straight. I can care less if you believe me about anything. You have proven yourself (to me) that you are only here to instigate trouble. All because you don't agree with someone.

Geez. Get a life, you are pathetic.

That's just a stupid excuse for your being caught at not checking your facts.

As for your taking your video as gospel......there are plenty of videos, books, reports, etc that state all kinds of wacky things. There are videos with convincing evidence that we never went to the moon, for instance. Tell me, do you believe in UFO's? (legitimate question)

Like I already said, check the references. Oh, that's right, you never bother with the facts. Extra points for your feeble attempt at a Straw Man Fallacy, with the UFO thing. You are really getting desperate, aren't you?

Now for your list. I've said it before, so here goes again. Your list is nothing more than a model of human nature with your own words thrown in. What you did was study the posts here and write the list based on the posts that occurred BEFORE your list was compiled. So you are doing things backward. The list should have been first, and the patterns emerge in the postings to prove it. But instead, you just wrote your list to cover every contingency of argument against it. So, in essence, your list was created to stir up arguments, and that is the only reason.

If you don't believe me about your list being based on human nature, change the words around. Instead of CA, use whatever term you are calling yourself today. Instead of LRL, maybe use "scientific method" or something that you believe in. Then go back over the posts and see if the shoes haven't been put on different feet.

Totally backwards, again, little missy. The list is predictions of the future, you idiot. It even says so in the title! Get your mommy to help you read it. Or did she abuse you too?

And now you're trying to say the everyone behaves in the way described in my predictions list? Whatever you are, you are one sick puppy.

LRLs have been proven over and over, in many different ways, to be fake. And that's what you stand for? You ought to turn yourself in somewhere, because you are a danger to yourself and others, you nutcase!


P.S. You admitted to being on that FaceBook page, and there is only one "Eddie" on there, so I know it's you! But I'm not slamming you for it now, because people like you shouldn't breed, anyway.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

I now crown you as “King of the Cut and Paste “ nonsence..Art

 

[EddieR]

Are you really so blind that you don't understand that the way you word many of your posts can be construed as insulting? I think not. I think it's intentional.

Huh? Who says I'm trying to hide my insults? When someone insults me, I have the right to insult them back. That's life, get used to it, and quit whining about it. Or you stop insulting people. I see you couldn't answer my challenge to show where I ever insulted anyone first. So suck it up.

Interesting that as long as my answers to your questions went along with what you believed, then they were rational and honest....but as soon as I put up something you don't like, I'm "going off the deep end". I wonder what your doc would say about that?

Ah, you must be PMing with Broom Hilda! This isn't a sick-ology forum, and pea brains like you shouldn't be practicing without a license. It has nothing to do with what I "believe," Sherlock, it has to do with what sane people call "facts." Of course, that doesn't mean much to you and your sick-ology friends, who don't believe in reality.

Get things straight. I can care less if you believe me about anything. You have proven yourself (to me) that you are only here to instigate trouble. All because you don't agree with someone.

Geez. Get a life, you are pathetic.

That's just a stupid excuse for your being caught at not checking your facts.

As for your taking your video as gospel......there are plenty of videos, books, reports, etc that state all kinds of wacky things. There are videos with convincing evidence that we never went to the moon, for instance. Tell me, do you believe in UFO's? (legitimate question)

Like I already said, check the references. Oh, that's right, you never bother with the facts. Extra points for your feeble attempt at a Straw Man Fallacy, with the UFO thing. You are really getting desperate, aren't you?

Now for your list. I've said it before, so here goes again. Your list is nothing more than a model of human nature with your own words thrown in. What you did was study the posts here and write the list based on the posts that occurred BEFORE your list was compiled. So you are doing things backward. The list should have been first, and the patterns emerge in the postings to prove it. But instead, you just wrote your list to cover every contingency of argument against it. So, in essence, your list was created to stir up arguments, and that is the only reason.

If you don't believe me about your list being based on human nature, change the words around. Instead of CA, use whatever term you are calling yourself today. Instead of LRL, maybe use "scientific method" or something that you believe in. Then go back over the posts and see if the shoes haven't been put on different feet.

Totally backwards, again, little missy. The list is predictions of the future, you idiot. It even says so in the title! Get your mommy to help you read it. Or did she abuse you too?

And now you're trying to say the everyone behaves in the way described in my predictions list? Whatever you are, you are one sick puppy.

LRLs have been proven over and over, in many different ways, to be fake. And that's what you stand for? You ought to turn yourself in somewhere, because you are a danger to yourself and others, you nutcase!


P.S. You admitted to being on that FaceBook page, and there is only one "Eddie" on there, so I know it's you! But I'm not slamming you for it now, because people like you shouldn't breed, anyway.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Ho ho!!! You tell me to quit whining when you are the ultimate whiner on here! Grow up, for crying out loud. Act your age. To paraphrase you, I'm not going back through old posts to find where you started insulting people.

Evidently you can't figure out a simple little thing like Facebook. If you want to see my pic on there, look in Judy's friends, for crying out loud. Click on it, and you will go to my page with my pic (the same one that is here on TNet...I see you were too lazy to look that up too). Geez...kids can figure it out, what's wrong with you? Meds got your thinking muddled? The pic that you are obsessed with is one that Ted or SWR (I think) posted here long before you got here.

BTW, the UFO question was a legitimate question, as I said. I guess you need to ask Randi for some help in reading comprehension. I'm sure he'll help you. He'll take your little........hand, and guide you. And from then on, he'll.....stand behind you in all that you do.

And yes the list is just a simple list based on past posts by the members here. You may not want to admit it, because you don't want your thunder stolen, I suppose. Geez...get a grip. As I said, the words are easily interchangeable. It's called human nature. Learn, and you won't look so foolish.

Once again, for the gazzilionth time. I am interested in the theory of LRL's. I do not promote the use of them. It is an interest, that's all. Oh...since I am interested in them and post about them, then that makes me a promoter in your eyes, right? Well, since you guys are all harping about Randi's test, then you are promoting him. And to me, that means you are promoting his....um..."interests" too. Doesn't surprise me. Tell me, do you share his fascinations?

 

[EddieR]

Once again, for the gazzilionth time. I am interested in the theory of LRL's. I do not promote the use of them. It is an interest, that's all. Oh...since I am interested in them and post about them, then that makes me a promoter in your eyes, right? Well, since you guys are all harping about Randi's test, then you are promoting him. And to me, that means you are promoting his....um..."interests" too. Doesn't surprise me. Tell me, do you share his fascinations?

Two things.....

First off...you claimed earlier that you did not care about what was inside of the LRL you allegedly own. However....you are interested in the theory? Skewed logic...but, whatever

Secondly...please list the fascinations of James Randi. Evidently, you've been close enough to him that he has disclosed this information to you. Reliable references and sources are expected.

Sure I'm interested in the theory. But I'm not gonna go tear things open to see what makes it tick.

Randi has certain..."preferences" that have been discussed many places online. Feel free to check it out. Me....I wouldn't get near that ball of slime.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

First off...you claimed earlier that you did not care about what was inside of the LRL you allegedly own. However....you are interested in the theory?

You finally get what we are interested in..We do not care what is in the box only what it will locate for us. We are also interested in how it works. So far all the EE’s have not even come close to an explanation.. Welcome to the club…

Secondly...please list the fascinations of James Randi. Evidently, you've been close enough to him that he has disclosed this information to you. Reliable references and sources are expected.

We believe Randi when he stated..
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/background/nicholls.html
'I am a charlatan, a liar, a thief and a fake altogether.'

 

[EE THr]

Evidently you can't figure out a simple little thing like Facebook. If you want to see my pic on there, look in Judy's friends....

I did see it on Facebook. If that is a picture of a guy, he really needs some hormone shots or something.
And it does look a lot like your avatar.

And I'm not going to go off onto the topic of UFOs, even though you would rather discuss anything besides the math of LRLs.

And Randi has nothing to do with your LRL problem. You have already admitted that you can't possibly achieve reliability with them, no matter how many chances you get. And still, you don't mind them being falsely advertised, and promoted on here, to unsuspecting customers. Good going.

Any anti-fraud organization would vouch for the tactics listed there. Since we opponents are dealing with Truth, we don't need to use those con artists tricks. There is a difference. You people always ask us for facts and references, while you never provide any. Duh.

Those are not just "words" in my list, it's a compilation of trickery and evasiveactions used consistently by scammers.

Once again, for the gazzilionth time. I am interested in the theory of LRL's. I do not promote the use of them. It is an interest, that's all. Oh...since I am interested in them and post about them, then that makes me a promoter in your eyes, right?

I can't find where I called you a promoter in my post to you, can you quote it please? However, you are promoting the use of LRLs. Once again, you need to learn how to use a dictionary!

Quit posting nonsense, and stick to the thread topic. You have become as silly as con-artie.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Gee EE..We did the math and found that it was a bunch of B/S and had nothing to do with Treasure Hunting..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

What did you guys do to set off the solar flare of posts? Must have told them the truth again, I warned you about that.

Causes massive coronal ejections of transference and insults and likely a little of what I call the Erkle--"Did I do that?"

It's getting absolutely pitiful, argue, demand, insult, transfer, argue, deny, switch, argue and deny doing it, matching The 10,001

Posts Prediction. It was made straight from Freud, Pavlov, and Gestalt theories. No wonder someone hates them. This could be the

results of some repressed memories. For this amount of anger, must be deeply imbedded, and nasty. Shudder!!! Now I need a bath.

 

[EE THr]

What did you guys do to set off the solar flare of posts? Must have told them the truth again, I warned you about that.

Causes massive coronal ejections of transference and insults and likely a little of what I call the Erkle--"Did I do that?"

It's getting absolutely pitiful, argue, demand, insult, transfer, argue, deny, switch, argue and deny doing it, matching The 10,001

Posts Prediction. It was made straight from Freud, Pavlov, and Gestalt theories. No wonder someone hates them. This could be the

results of some repressed memories. For this amount of anger, must be deeply imbedded, and nasty. Shudder!!! Now I need a bath.

You've got no data to back up your nonsense devices, so of course you revert to nonsense sick-ology instead.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Saturna]

Shudder!!! Now I need a bath.

... and yet you keep coming back HERE, rather than forums where there is more censorship, or for the safety of something like a Tnet personal page.


Why would that be ?