Do The Math!

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

What happened to my post this morning?

In regards to carl's post to Hung, I agree with Hung, 100 % a 50 / 50- % chance of a head, in regards to the string of heads continuing, that is another matter.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

What happened to my post this morning?

In regards to carl's post to Hung, I agree with Hung, 100 % a 50 / 50- % chance of a head, in regards to the string of heads continuing, that is another matter.

Don Jose de La Mancha

RDT---

You seem to be losing a lot of posts for no particular reason.

Do you always wait a few seconds to be sure it went up in the first place?

 

[EE THr]

...In case you have not noticed the own/operators of these Treasure Hunting devices have no interest in Tests..Art

Where in this Section does it say that it was designed for LRL promoters?

If you aren't interested in this particular topic, then what are you doing here?

I started this topic, and I defined what it is about. You have no business trying to change it. If you want a specific topic, then start one of your own.

(Duh.)




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Where in this Section does it say that it was designed for LRL promoters?
If you aren't interested in this particular topic, then what are you doing here?
I started this topic, and I defined what it is about. You have no business trying to change it. If you want a specific topic, then start one of your own.

(Duh.)
Lets see now..This board is about a discussion of LRL’s used by Treasure Hunters..We hunt treasure…Please tell us of your experience as a Treasure Hunter?..Art

 

[EE THr]

Where in this Section does it say that it was designed for LRL promoters?

If you aren't interested in this particular topic, then what are you doing here?

I started this topic, and I defined what it is about. You have no business trying to change it. If you want a specific topic, then start one of your own.

(Duh.)

Lets see now..This board is about a discussion of LRL’s used by Treasure Hunters..We hunt treasure…Please tell us of your experience as a Treasure Hunter?..Art

Wrong again, con-artie. It's for discussion of the devices. Look for yourself.

And this topic is for discussion of the math, concerning the devices.

You are just trying to divert the subject to something else, which you can then fill with your BS. Since you can't BS mathematics, you need to try to run it off into something else. That's just a basic Straw Man Fallacy.

Sorry, no workie.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[hung]

What happened to my post this morning?

And what ever happened to the answers Carl and Dr Rudy were supposed to post regarding my questions on probabilities? Unsolved Mysteries?

 

[aarthrj3811]

before spending ONE DIME ON ANY "long range locator" . With that, I open this forum to the discussion of said devices. You see EE every one of your post are written as if these devices are made to do tests..You have been told that they were designed to find and recover Treasure…that is called Field Use…Random Chance can not be used in the field as there is no way to calculate it..
We do our own testing which we call practice using methods that we have learned from field use. This last weekend my sons and myself tested all my wife’s jewelry to determine the metal content of each piece…Some of the jewelry we were surprised as to what they really contained..Now I can make sure that each female in the family gets a piece of jewelry from her right down to the youngest great grand child who turned 1 Saturday….Art

 

[Rudy(CA)]

What happened to my post this morning?

And what ever happened to the answers Carl and Dr Rudy were supposed to post regarding my questions on probabilities? Unsolved Mysteries?

EE has reminded us of the purpose of this thread. I will not flip any more coins here.

 

[Rudy(CA)]

before spending ONE DIME ON ANY "long range locator" . With that, I open this forum to the discussion of said devices. You see EE every one of your post are written as if these devices are made to do tests..You have been told that they were designed to find and recover Treasure…that is called Field Use…Random Chance can not be used in the field as there is no way to calculate it..
We do our own testing which we call practice using methods that we have learned from field use. This last weekend my sons and myself tested all my wife’s jewelry to determine the metal content of each piece…Some of the jewelry we were surprised as to what they really contained..Now I can make sure that each female in the family gets a piece of jewelry from her right down to the youngest great grand child who turned 1 Saturday….Art

Oh, so now LRLs can give you the karat value of jewelry. Nice!

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Rudy~

Oh, so now LRLs can give you the karat value of jewelry. Nice!

Darn..I don’t remember saying that..Art

 

[hung]

EE has reminded us of the purpose of this thread. I will not flip any more coins here.

I see. You gave up.
I warned you that one of my favorites was not for anyone (here).

Now let's hear Carl's excuse. I bet he will say that he's too busy selling thousands of toy MDs to Afeghanistan.

And then think that these guys dare to post probabilities about LRLs?

 

[EE THr]

EE has reminded us of the purpose of this thread. I will not flip any more coins here.

I see. You gave up.
I warned you that one of my favorites was not for anyone (here).

Now let's hear Carl's excuse. I bet he will say that he's too busy selling thousands of toy MDs to Afeghanistan.

And then think that these guys dare to post probabilities about LRLs?

And I warned you that your Straw Man Fallacy diversion tactics aren't welcome here.

Stick to the topic, and quit trolling this thread. Or start your own topic.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

And I warned you that your Straw Man Fallacy diversion tactics aren't welcome here.
Stick to the topic, and quit trolling this thread. Or start your own topic.

So why are you still trolling this board and starting straw man threads?

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

And I warned you that your Straw Man Fallacy diversion tactics aren't welcome here.
Stick to the topic, and quit trolling this thread. Or start your own topic.

So why are you still trolling this board and starting straw man threads?

#22 in the link below.


Your misuse of the Straw Man Fallacy concept obviously shows your intentions to merely be a Troll.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

I reckon that you still do not understand that your math is of no use to use (The treasure hunters). We live in the real world and do not us guessing to find treasure..Art

 

[Rudy(CA)]

I reckon that you still do not understand that your math is of no use to use (The treasure hunters). We live in the real world and do not us guessing to find treasure..Art

Artie, if you do not need to guess then you should be able to ace out the test and pocket the loot. No?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

The problem here, as I see it...is that "Artie" isn't really a "treasure hunter"....so there is no loot to be pocketed.
A real "treasure hunter" doesn't stand on the edge of a five-acre tract of land....wave a pocket calculator around and around and then walk away without actually hunting for treasure. That's called pretending in anyone's book

Thank You SWR..Again, you show your complete lack of knowledge of our hobby..Art

 

[EE THr]

I reckon that you still do not understand that your math is of no use to use (The treasure hunters). We live in the real world and do not us guessing to find treasure..Art

Oh! Now I get it!

Your LRLs actually work better under adverse conditions!

The more interference and false indications there are, the more "treasure" you find.

And just because the things don't work at all under ideal conditions, just doesn't mean a thing.

Wowie! Why didn't you just say that in the first place?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Oh! Now I get it!
Your LRLs actually work better under adverse conditions!
The more interference and false indications there are, the more "treasure" you find.
And just because the things don't work at all under ideal conditions, just doesn't mean a thing.
Wowie! Why didn't you just say that in the first place?

Wowie! I see that you still have a reading comprehension problem..Your understanding of idea conditions are different from mine. I would guess that the good lord gave me a different understanding of seeking treasure. He gave me the understanding of how to locate gold using the best methods that are available to me..What’s wrong EE..Can’t you understand that I am happy with my hobby?...Art