Different Ways of Testing LRLs

[fenixdigger]

I've pretty much had all I want of caves. I knew I shouldn't shoot, but I just couldn't stop myself. Reflexes I guess. 45's and caves don't mix well.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

I’m with you on caves..If it is not fun I don’t participate..Art

 

[EE THr]

When fakers can't face the topic, they make up phony cave stories. Great for their negative credibility.

Who asked you to post that kind of stuff on this thread?

I guess if you don't know the difference between a calculator and a metal detector, you won't have much luck reading, either.

 

[EE THr]

I notice that the "fenix nine" are still posting insults to posts that they haven't even read. Great negative credibility there.

I wonder if they actually think that they are convincing anyone to go out and buy an LRL?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

When fakers can't face the topic, they make up phony cave stories. Great for their negative credibility.

Just telling Treasure Hunters about how we use our devices.

Who asked you to post that kind of stuff on this thread?

You invited this discussion.. Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I guess if you don't know the difference between a calculator and a metal detector, you won't have much luck reading, either.

I have tested calculators as stand alone MFD’s…they will work but are not very good. I have tested a conventional metal dectector also. After digging a hundred or so pull tabs on the gold setting I tossed it.

 

[fenixdigger]

Wonder if we can get an answer to that question on this thread since it is a test of a lrl. Come on EE give it a shot. you demand everyone answer your meaningless questions, answer a real one. Why are you afraid to try it.

 

[EE THr]

Wonder if we can get an answer to that question on this thread since it is a test of a lrl. Come on EE give it a shot. you demand everyone answer your meaningless questions, answer a real one. Why are you afraid to try it.

Why are you afraid, yourself, to try it, in public.

You shouldn't be afraid of your own test, should you?



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Here's the best way to test a LRL,,,,, ANSWER the questions.

 

[EE THr]

Fenix brothers---

Already answered, in the appropriate thread.

You are multiple posting and cross posting.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?


Multiple posting you say?

You haven't answered anything except in your mind. Let the rest of us hear it.

Man up or shut up---Answer the questions

 

[EE THr]

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?


Multiple posting you say?

You haven't answered anything except in your mind. Let the rest of us hear it.

Man up or shut up---Answer the questions

#32.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

#32.

~EE~

#32.

That would be fine, if you didn't claim to others that you can do that.

When you start insisting that something is true, you must either back it up, or back down.

Makes perfect sense to you ?

 

[EE THr]

artie---

You have admitted that Carl's test is the same as your test, below.

...I have posted a test for the owner/operators that will prove to them that their devices will pass the test or not. It proves the same thing that Carl’s test would accomplish..So please tell us why this test is not the same?

This is my version of a Blind test. I use halves of 6 Plastic Easter eggs and a coin. I give my son the coin and he goes out the back door and I stay inside while he places the coin under one of the egg halves. He then goes around the house and knocks on the front door. I go out, not having any contact with him.

...I locate the coin, go in the house and give it to the him and start over again. I make 10 to 15 passes and then take a break. My results are all ways the same. I find the coin every time.

If you are telling the truth, above, then why would you turn down an easy profit of $20K, after expenses, for passing Carl's test?

If you don't trust Carl, he says you can get an unbiased proctor to administer the test. And he is legally committed to paying the reward, as in the link below.

If you don't need the $20K, then do the test at your local metal detector club. I'm sure that they would appreciate your knowledge, if you succeed.

Or, you could even do it at your local high school science department. It would be a great benefit for the kids to observe a random double-blind test, in person.

You are always saying that you tell about your LRLs here, because you want to help people. The club and school would both be helped by your performance.

Either of the three would certainly prove that LRLs work, and thus stop the controversy, which is what all of the LRL promoters on here are continually complaining about. And that would be helping people, too.

Since you are such a helpful person, I imagine that you will be anxious to step up, and do one of the above three, right away.

Which will it be?


Please let me know if you feel that any part of this post is, in any way, an insult---and why.

 

[aarthrj3811]

I will file your answer

 

[EE THr]

I will file your answer

Thanks for further proof of your insincerity.

If you are telling the truth, above, then why would you turn down an easy profit of $20K, after expenses, for passing Carl's test?

Your lack of rational response is significant evidence that you were lying about your referenced success.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Now I get it,, you're the claims and statement police. Good job. OMG again. Somebody help this person, PLEASE


Man up or shut up ANSWER the questions

 

[EE THr]

Now I get it,, you're the claims and statement police. Good job. OMG again. Somebody help this person, PLEASE


Man up or shut up ANSWER the questions

fenix brothers---Answer: #32 in the bottom link. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Isn't this special?

fenis brothers---Andser: #32 in the bottom link. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?

Well Fenis (snicker) brothers says your little dodge won't work. All the big posters are laughing at you now. Are you happy?

Man up or shut up ANDSER (snicker again) the questions OMG The rivets have blown out.

 

[EE THr]

Isn't this special?

fenis brothers---Andser: #32 in the bottom link. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?

Well Fenis (snicker) brothers says your little dodge won't work. All the big posters are laughing at you now. Are you happy?

Man up or shut up ANDSER (snicker again) the questions OMG The rivets have blown out.

fenix brothers---Answer: #32 in the bottom link. Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Gee LT..Looks like he thinks his answers are so good that he can keep posting them for any question that is ask..Art