Different Ways of Testing LRLs

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

It says nothing about a lawyer being paid anything, or being required. Notaries charge about ten bucks. What "location fees"? Who charges for scanning the area, that's for your to do, if you want to.

So now lawyers work for free..

Claimant is responsible for any costs associated with the use of a location2.

OK
Who charges for scanning the area, that's for your to do, if you want to.

Claimant is encouraged to scan the chosen location for anomalies prior to the start of the test

And just who will scan the area during the test?..A signal transmitted from 5 miles away by a VHF MFD could cause a miss by transmitting a signal for a few minutes…Art

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

~EE~

It says nothing about a lawyer being paid anything, or being required. Notaries charge about ten bucks. What "location fees"? Who charges for scanning the area, that's for your to do, if you want to.

So now lawyers work for free..

Claimant is responsible for any costs associated with the use of a location2.

OK
Who charges for scanning the area, that's for your to do, if you want to.

Claimant is encouraged to scan the chosen location for anomalies prior to the start of the test

And just who will scan the area during the test?..A signal transmitted from 5 miles away by a VHF MFD could cause a miss by transmitting a signal for a few minutes…Art

It doesn't say you need a lawyer. Besides, even if you did, you can pay it out of the $25K winnings. (Duh!)

The "Location 2" is if you don't like Carl's location for some reason, and want to pick your own location, but that doesn't mean you have to pick a location that is going to cost anything. But Carl isn't going to pay every time someone wants to "try" the test, if there are costs involved. Use some common sense, instead of trying to pick apart everything. Jeeze, you complain all the time about us not trusting you About all of your fantastic claims, then you try to nit-pick everything about Carl's test? That doesn't make sense. Ultimately, Carl says that you can negotiate to arrive at some means of testing that you both agree on, so that eliminates all of your worries about costs, right there. But you are the one who is always saying that money means nothing to you---so why the worries now?

I don't see anything that would indicate that there is a "charge" for scanning the area. That's an option that you are allowed to do if you think there might be something that would interfere with your LRL.

If you think that someone is going to intentionally try to jamb your "signal," then how would they know when you are taking the test, and when you are only scanning the area?

Since MFDs don't transmit on VHF, you have nothing to worry about there. And since your LRLs have no receiver section, there is no chance of any kind of radio interference at all.

Nobody wants to interfere with your test. We would all like it if there were a way to locate precious metals at long distances. We would rather have you pass. Since we are confident that LRLs don't work, none of us would feel it necessary to try to "interfere" with your device. But, as I mentioned before, since they don't operate by radio waves, there is no known way to cause interference, anyway.

One thing is for sure, if you did a demonstration of a random, double-blind test at your locat Treasure Hunting club, or your local high school Science department, there would be no interference, and the testers would be unbiased. So why don't you do that?

And what about that link or quote that I asked for?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Since MFDs don't transmit on VHF, you have nothing to worry about there. And since your LRLs have no receiver section, there is no chance of any kind of radio interference at all.

Thank You again for explaining your complete lack of knowledge about our hobby..Art

 

[EE THr]

Since MFDs don't transmit on VHF, you have nothing to worry about there. And since your LRLs have no receiver section, there is no chance of any kind of radio interference at all.

Thank You again for explaining your complete lack of knowledge about our hobby..Art

That's real nice.

What is the transmitted power output, in Watts?

What is the frequency?

What type of radio station operator's license does it require?







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE!
That's real nice.

What is the transmitted power output, in Watts?

I assume it is more than 5 watts..

What is the frequency?

MFD..Multi frequency ..

What type of radio station operator's license does it require?

I don’t know that it can be operated even with a license.
You may want to talk to your ”handlers” before the hole gets much deeper..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE!
That's real nice.

What is the transmitted power output, in Watts?

I assume it is more than 5 watts..

What is the frequency?

MFD..Multi frequency ..

What type of radio station operator's license does it require?

I don’t know that it can be operated even with a license.
You may want to talk to your ”handlers” before the hole gets much deeper..Art

In other words, it has no power output.

And, since it doesn't output anything, there is no transmitted frequency.

You're right---it can't be operated, because it is non-functional.

Nice try, connutty.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

I will file this answer.

 

[EE THr]

So, you refuse to take Carl's random double-blind test.

And you refuse to take your own ransom double-blind test.

That proves that you can't pass any test of your fake LRLs.

Your silly excuses are too lame to convince anyone.









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

So, you refuse to take Carl's random double-blind test.

Yes I have for the reasons that I have posted many times

And you refuse to take your own ransom double-blind test.

I preformed my own Double blind test just 3 days ago..Those present were..My son, 2 LRL users and a Dowser.

This is my version of a Blind test. I use halves of 6 Plastic Easter eggs and a coin. I give my son the coin and he goes out the back door and I stay inside while he places the coin under one of the egg halves. He then goes around the house and knocks on the front door. I go out, not having any contact with him. I start Locating thinking of anything else except for the my device. Sometimes it is what I'm going to do tomorrow or a movie I saw the night before. I locate the coin, go in the house and give it to the him and start over again. I make 10 to 15 passes and then take a break. My results are all ways the same. I find the coin every time.

When I do the test and I think about finding the coin my results are different. The best was 60% finds but the usual is between 30% and 50% finds. I have done this test more than 20 times.

Why do I do these test? To see if I am still doing it right. I refuse to let the Ideomotor Effects control my Devices.. UNLESS I want it to. When I test in my backyard I know that some mystery signal from a SUV will not block my signals. ..Art

That proves that you can't pass any test of your fake LRLs.

Just your opinion and I do not trust your opinions

Your silly excuses are too lame to convince anyone

.
No amount of proof will convince Skeptics…Art

"For those who don't believe, no amount of evidence is enough. And for those who do believe, no evidence is necessary."

 

[EE THr]

con-artie;

If you don't need to test, then why do you? You are contradicting yourself (again).

And if you don't truse me, then why should I trust you?

If you don't care if anyone believes you, then why do you keep posting?

All of your excuses are lame. You can't pass the test because you are a faker.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~
con-artie;

If you don't need to test, then why do you? You are contradicting yourself (again).

For the Treasure Hunters…I have been working with a new Silver Equation. I have also extended my antenna length by a ¼ inch..Worked good on known targets.,. Now I know it works good on unknown targets.

And if you don't truse me, then why should I trust you?

I have not ask anyone to trust me…I am doing what I always do..Give advice to Treasure Hunters…What I say may help someone.

If you don't care if anyone believes you, then why do you keep posting?

Because ..I can…Art

 

[EE THr]

con-artie;

You failed to answer my question---

Can you either provide a link to your post about the test of Carl's that you attended, or quote it?

I think you are making this stuff up.

You won't state what you think would be fair, so that means you won't take any test, ever, even if you designed it yourself! That says it all, right there. I've asked you several times to state what you think would be fair, and you either don't reply at all, or just give some silly nonsense answer. You won't take any test, because you know that you are a fake. It's as simple as that. Sorry, but you have proven that to be true, all by yourself. That's called self evident. Thanks.

And, as for your camplaint about costs, you can cover that with the $25K, plus travel and lodging, and car rental, and still have over $20K profit left!

Besides, you keep saying that you have plenty of money, and don't care about the money. So quite making phony excuses and take the test.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

You won't state what you think would be fair, so that means you won't take any test, ever, even if you designed it yourself! That says it all, right there. I've asked you several times to state what you think would be fair, and you either don't reply at all, or just give some silly nonsense answer. You won't take any test, because you know that you are a fake. It's as simple as that. Sorry, but you have proven that to be true, all by yourself. That's called self evident. Thanks.

Yes this post is very self evident…Art

 

[EE THr]

You failed to answer my question---

Can you either provide a link to your post about the test of Carl's that you attended, or quote it?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~
You failed to answer my question---

Can you either provide a link to your post about the test of Carl's that you attended, or quote it?

No I can not

I think you are making this stuff up.

Real life is funny..If you live the life there is no need to make stuff up..How do you do it?

You won't state what you think would be fair, so that means you won't take any test, ever, even if you designed it yourself! That says it all, right there. I've asked you several times to state what you think would be fair, and you either don't reply at all, or just give some silly nonsense answer. You won't take any test, because you know that you are a fake. It's as simple as that. Sorry, but you have proven that to be true, all by yourself. That's called self evident. Thanks.

I preformed my own Double blind test just 3 days ago..Those present were..My son, 2 LRL users and a Dowser.

This is my version of a Blind test. I use halves of 6 Plastic Easter eggs and a coin. I give my son the coin and he goes out the back door and I stay inside while he places the coin under one of the egg halves. He then goes around the house and knocks on the front door. I go out, not having any contact with him. I start Locating thinking of anything else except for the my device. Sometimes it is what I'm going to do tomorrow or a movie I saw the night before. I locate the coin, go in the house and give it to the him and start over again. I make 10 to 15 passes and then take a break. My results are all ways the same. I find the coin every time.

When I do the test and I think about finding the coin my results are different. The best was 60% finds but the usual is between 30% and 50% finds. I have done this test more than 20 times.

Besides, you keep saying that you have plenty of money, and don't care about the money. So quite making phony excuses and take the test.

Yes..I have enough money to live my life the way I want…In case of an emergency I could always use my knowledge, skills and equipment to get more money..Art

 

[EE THr]

con-artie;

You have yet to suggest a different way of testing your LRLs, which you feel is fair.

Since that is what the topic of this thread is all about, why are you even posting here? Other than simply trying to promote your fantasy beliefs in LRLs?

 

[aarthrj3811]

con-artie;

You have yet to suggest a different way of testing your LRLs, which you feel is fair.
Since that is what the topic of this thread is all about, why are you even posting here? Other than simply trying to promote your fantasy beliefs in LRLs?

Gee EE..I have posted a test for the owner/operators that will prove to them that their devices will pass the test or not. It proves the same thing that Carl’s test would accomplish..So please tell us why this test is not the same? So..where does the fantasy beliefs come into the discussion?

This is my version of a Blind test. I use halves of 6 Plastic Easter eggs and a coin. I give my son the coin and he goes out the back door and I stay inside while he places the coin under one of the egg halves. He then goes around the house and knocks on the front door. I go out, not having any contact with him. I start Locating thinking of anything else except for the my device. Sometimes it is what I'm going to do tomorrow or a movie I saw the night before. I locate the coin, go in the house and give it to the him and start over again. I make 10 to 15 passes and then take a break. My results are all ways the same. I find the coin every time.

When I do the test and I think about finding the coin my results are different. The best was 60% finds but the usual is between 30% and 50% finds. I have done this test more than 20 times.

Please go to this web site so you may understand what we are posting about. http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reward.dat

 

[EE THr]

con-artie;

You have yet to suggest a different way of testing your LRLs, which you feel is fair.
Since that is what the topic of this thread is all about, why are you even posting here? Other than simply trying to promote your fantasy beliefs in LRLs?

Gee EE..I have posted a test for the owner/operators that will prove to them that their devices will pass the test or not. It proves the same thing that Carl’s test would accomplish..So please tell us why this test is not the same? So..where does the fantasy beliefs come into the discussion?

This is my version of a Blind test. I use halves of 6 Plastic Easter eggs and a coin. I give my son the coin and he goes out the back door and I stay inside while he places the coin under one of the egg halves. He then goes around the house and knocks on the front door. I go out, not having any contact with him. I start Locating thinking of anything else except for the my device. Sometimes it is what I'm going to do tomorrow or a movie I saw the night before. I locate the coin, go in the house and give it to the him and start over again. I make 10 to 15 passes and then take a break. My results are all ways the same. I find the coin every time.

When I do the test and I think about finding the coin my results are different. The best was 60% finds but the usual is between 30% and 50% finds. I have done this test more than 20 times.

Please go to this web site so you may understand what we are posting about. http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pages/common/index.pl?page=lrl&file=reward.dat

One of your fantasy beliefs is that a private test is the same as a public test. You want us to trust you that you are telling the truth about your private test results. Yet you don't trust anyone to administer a public test, not Carl, not Randi, not your local metal detector club, and not even your local high school science department. Instead, you refuse to take a random double-blind test run by any of them.

So, now that we have a test procedure of which you approve, above, who would you trust to administer it?

 

[aarthrj3811]

One of your fantasy beliefs is that a private test is the same as a public test. You want us to trust you that you are telling the truth about your private test results. Yet you don't trust anyone to administer a public test, not Carl, not Randi, not your local metal detector club, and not even your local high school science department. Instead, you refuse to take a random double-blind test run by any of them.

So, now that we have a test procedure of which you approve, above, who would you trust to administer it?

Just more excuses…
Public
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"General public" redirects here. For the English band, see General Public. For the 1998 pop album, see Public (album).
"General audience" redirects here. For formal meeting, see Audience (meeting).
Look up public or general public in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

In public relations and communication science, publics are groups of individuals, and the public (a.k.a. the general public) is the totality of such groupings.[1][2] This is a different concept to the sociological concept of the Öffentlichkeit or public sphere.[1] The concept of a public has also been defined in political science, psychology, marketing, and advertising. In public relations and communication science, it is one of the more ambiguous concepts in the field.[3] Although it has definitions in the theory of the field that have been formulated from the early 20th century onwards, it has suffered in more recent years from being blurred, as a result of conflation of the idea of a public with the notions of audience, market segment, community, constituency, and stakeholder.
It sure would not be a Skeptic..You can read Carl’s test at http://www.geotech1.com/cgi-bin/pag...dex.pl?page=lrl&file=reward.dat. .It meets or surpasses all of his requirements..Art

 

[Saturna]

Just more excuses…
..Art

LOL, and this coming from an avid reader of The Big Book of Dowsing Excuses.