Point is, you're comparing the wind, everything I have posted being "extremely relevant" to both this thread and to the failed purpose of the logic being applied. In essence you are comparing the random scribblings of different individuals, all of which, unknown to you, are the simple random products of the English language. Point is, you could no doubt discover the same, or even more comparison, when comparing the random writings of just about any author to those same authors you are trying to compare here. This is all a condition of real world fact, which pretty much completely explains, and erases, the totally expected results you're proposing. So why in the world would anyone desire to compare such things? Or better yet, why in the world would any knowledgeable person think that any of it would be relevant to the topic in some way? Obviously, they wouldn't. You're just grasping at straws.....