Deciphered Pages From People That Claim They Are The ONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a place to compare all the peoples decipherments of the Beale Ciphers. According to we here there are many of these documents out on the interwebs​. I hope to put them up here and that we may compare them one to another. There can only be one King you know!

:laughing7:....I suppose the above is all irregular too? Roughly the same 30% of the above text beginning with words where the first letter is a vowel. :laughing7:
The odds that of you and I writing completing different text with words in the same position that start with the same vowel are actually pretty high, even expected.

This is what I was referencing when I suggested to you that people never take the time to self-check their own applied logic.....:laughing7: In essence, you are establishing/proving my point "exactly" with every sentence you have written. :icon_thumright:
 

Last edited:
You do realize this is not the true interpretation of the page 2. This is the doctored versions we see in the pamphlet...
The 1885 Beale Papers is the ORIGINAL source of the Beale story and ciphers, so WHO doctored the ciphers in the job print pamphlet- "the "unknown author", Ward, the type setter/printer Sherman ?
Once you explain who, then comes the WHY?
 

:laughing7:....I suppose the above is all irregular too? Roughly the same 30% of the above text beginning with words where the first letter is a vowel. :laughing7:
The odds that of you and I writing completing different text with words in the same position that start with the same vowel are actually pretty high, even expected.

This is what I was referencing when I suggested to you that people never take the time to self-check their own applied logic.....:laughing7: In essence, you are establishing/proving my point "exactly" with every sentence you have written. :icon_thumright:

Mod's must be doing there jobs. No need to argue, but you just can not stop yourself. I am only comparing deciphered pages here not getting into some filsofical debate. If you can post your deciphered page we can look at it for you.
 

Mod's must be doing there jobs. No need to argue, but you just can not stop yourself. I am only comparing deciphered pages here not getting into some filsofical debate. If you can post your deciphered page we can look at it for you.

Point is, you're comparing the wind, everything I have posted being "extremely relevant" to both this thread and to the failed purpose of the logic being applied. In essence you are comparing the random scribblings of different individuals, all of which, unknown to you, are the simple random products of the English language. Point is, you could no doubt discover the same, or even more comparison, when comparing the random writings of just about any author to those same authors you are trying to compare here. This is all a condition of real world fact, which pretty much completely explains, and erases, the totally expected results you're proposing. So why in the world would anyone desire to compare such things? Or better yet, why in the world would any knowledgeable person think that any of it would be relevant to the topic in some way? Obviously, they wouldn't. You're just grasping at straws.....
 

Point is, you're comparing the wind, everything I have posted being "extremely relevant" to both this thread and to the failed purpose of the logic being applied. In essence you are comparing the random scribblings of different individuals, all of which, unknown to you, are the simple random products of the English language. Point is, you could no doubt discover the same, or even more comparison, when comparing the random writings of just about any author to those same authors you are trying to compare here. This is all a condition of real world fact, which pretty much completely explains, and erases, the totally expected results you're proposing. So why in the world would anyone desire to compare such things? Or better yet, why in the world would any knowledgeable person think that any of it would be relevant to the topic in some way? Obviously, they wouldn't. You're just grasping at straws.....

Same old song and dance my friend!
Spam your own thread!
 

Point is, you're comparing the wind, everything I have posted being "extremely relevant" to both this thread and to the failed purpose of the logic being applied. In essence you are comparing the random scribblings of different individuals, all of which, unknown to you, are the simple random products of the English language. Point is, you could no doubt discover the same, or even more comparison, when comparing the random writings of just about any author to those same authors you are trying to compare here. This is all a condition of real world fact, which pretty much completely explains, and erases, the totally expected results you're proposing. So why in the world would anyone desire to compare such things? Or better yet, why in the world would any knowledgeable person think that any of it would be relevant to the topic in some way? Obviously, they wouldn't. You're just grasping at straws.....

Just don't care what you have to say!
Quit Stalking me!
 

Just don't care what you have to say!
Quit Stalking me!

Stalking can only exist when one isn't taking part in the engagement. I believe if you will research, my friend, you will discover that you engaged in this debate/conversation. You can't openly take part and continue to do so and then whine of..."stalking." :laughing7: Really all you need to do is to put me on ignore and then do so.
 

Stalking can only exist when one isn't taking part in the engagement. I believe if you will research, my friend, you will discover that you engaged in this debate/conversation. You can't openly take part and continue to do so and then whine of..."stalking." :laughing7: Really all you need to do is to put me on ignore and then do so.

I know, you can start your own thread eh!
 

With all these big game hunters stalking on this forum it is best to go alone. /////////////////////////////
 

Last edited:
With all these big game hunters stalking on this forum it is best to go alone. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Big game hunters?.....:laughing7:
 

With all these big game hunters stalking on this forum it is best to go alone. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Did he fall asleep on the keyboard mate?
 

Last edited:
Mr A's 10-19 for page 1
10=M
11=A,N
12=F,L,E,
13=E,D
14=T,E,R
15=L,E
16=D,Y,S
17=F,E,Y
18=T,R,F,N
19=T,Z,O,E
 

You are looking for the wrong ciphers. You need to look for the ciphers that repeat several times
Such as the 10 which repeats three times on the letter M.

Exactly where do I have the letter "N" on ll. I can not find it. All I have is the letter "A"
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top