Hi, hoping someone can help me find out how to research a mechanical bank I have. Itās says 1884 J&E Stevens coasting bank. Many thanks in advance
Coasting bank - cast iron mechanical bank
- Thread starter pete76
- Start date
ARC
Gold Member
- Aug 19, 2014
- 37,965
- 136,683
- Detector(s) used
- JW 8X-ML X2-VP 585
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Detailed photos of the original are key..... dimensions... weight.. etc
But here is another "thing" to keep in mind and help find a key to this one....... IF there is only one known...... to copy it / repo it would be VEERY hard.
So....... Size and those things would be off.
But here is another "thing" to keep in mind and help find a key to this one....... IF there is only one known...... to copy it / repo it would be VEERY hard.
So....... Size and those things would be off.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
- Thread starter
- #23
Thanks Red and Arc, I think I inadvertently found my passion! Genuinely excited either way, if itās a reproduction then thatās fine, thereās a story there as to how and when given the ābabyā that sold recently, then who reproduced and how many š. The story and research is one thatās got me hooked
Upvote
0
Upvote
1
Red-Coat
Gold Member
I believe the patent reference is for John Hallās invention of 2nd February 1875, but itās for an improvement in the coin container rather than the overall design of the money-box.
Be it known that I, JOHN HALL, of Watertown, of the county of Middlesex and State of Massachusetts, have invented a new and useful Toy Money-Box; and do hereby declare the same to be fully described in the following specification and represented in the accompanying drawings, of which Figure 1 is a front view; Fig. 2, a transverse section. Fig. 3 represents the bottom of the box, showing an opening for removing the money; and Fig. 4, a circular plate for closing said opening.
Be it known that I, JOHN HALL, of Watertown, of the county of Middlesex and State of Massachusetts, have invented a new and useful Toy Money-Box; and do hereby declare the same to be fully described in the following specification and represented in the accompanying drawings, of which Figure 1 is a front view; Fig. 2, a transverse section. Fig. 3 represents the bottom of the box, showing an opening for removing the money; and Fig. 4, a circular plate for closing said opening.
Upvote
1
- Jun 8, 2006
- 6,209
- 8,689
- Detector(s) used
- Whites, Minelab, Tesoro, and custom machines
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
I think the screws are handmade because the slots are off center?
Upvote
1
Red-Coat
Gold Member
Bummer that the auction houses arenāt offering anything helpful. A few more thoughts, which may or may not be helpful.
Circa 1900, the British company John Harper & Co Ltd of Willenhall illegally produced direct copies of mechanical banks from both the Shepard Hardware Company of Buffalo, NY and the J &E Stevens Company of Cromwell, CT.
As far as I know, Harper were never bold enough to include the original maker name on their copies, but perhaps there were other companies who had no such scruples, effectively producing contemporary counterfeits rather than copies. Harper did however include the original patent references for at least the first few years of production, after which they removed the information (perhaps in fear of legal action for fraudulent use).
Harper copies can be distinguished by either the absence of the patent references (on their later production), or from minor details such as drill-tapered holes, or the use of alternative materials. This Harper copy (an early one, with a fraudulent patent reference) for example has a cast-iron coin-arm rather than the pressed steel used for the original. Sincere apologies for the āN-wordā and the racial stereotyping, which I show only in the interests of historical accuracy.
If yours is a copy (and bear in mind that there were contemporary copyists/counterfeiters as well as more recent ones, such that the screw types would be similar) then the producer would have needed access to an original, or detailed drawings of it. If itās a counterfeit rather than a copy, one would have to question why the baby was replaced by the child. Thereās no record of Stevens having produced a āchildā version but, then again, the ābabyā version was unknown to collectors until 1955. The fact that only one surviving example appears to exist suggests it may have been a short-lived design. Perhaps a copyist found the child easier to cast, or judged it to have a wider appeal? It canāt have been in the interests of avoiding legal action for plagiarism, otherwise why leave the original manufacturer name on it?
If itās a more modern copy, itās generally the case that leaving the original manufacturer name in place is āsafeā if the company is defunct. Stevens was bought out by Buckley Brothers of New York in 1950, so it would likely be after that date.
As I said previously, copies of banks like this have been widely-produced for collectors for many years. Hereās a couple from my collection, both produced in Taiwan and about 35 years old, although neither have any original manufacturer names or patent details as part of their castings.
Circa 1900, the British company John Harper & Co Ltd of Willenhall illegally produced direct copies of mechanical banks from both the Shepard Hardware Company of Buffalo, NY and the J &E Stevens Company of Cromwell, CT.
As far as I know, Harper were never bold enough to include the original maker name on their copies, but perhaps there were other companies who had no such scruples, effectively producing contemporary counterfeits rather than copies. Harper did however include the original patent references for at least the first few years of production, after which they removed the information (perhaps in fear of legal action for fraudulent use).
Harper copies can be distinguished by either the absence of the patent references (on their later production), or from minor details such as drill-tapered holes, or the use of alternative materials. This Harper copy (an early one, with a fraudulent patent reference) for example has a cast-iron coin-arm rather than the pressed steel used for the original. Sincere apologies for the āN-wordā and the racial stereotyping, which I show only in the interests of historical accuracy.
If yours is a copy (and bear in mind that there were contemporary copyists/counterfeiters as well as more recent ones, such that the screw types would be similar) then the producer would have needed access to an original, or detailed drawings of it. If itās a counterfeit rather than a copy, one would have to question why the baby was replaced by the child. Thereās no record of Stevens having produced a āchildā version but, then again, the ābabyā version was unknown to collectors until 1955. The fact that only one surviving example appears to exist suggests it may have been a short-lived design. Perhaps a copyist found the child easier to cast, or judged it to have a wider appeal? It canāt have been in the interests of avoiding legal action for plagiarism, otherwise why leave the original manufacturer name on it?
If itās a more modern copy, itās generally the case that leaving the original manufacturer name in place is āsafeā if the company is defunct. Stevens was bought out by Buckley Brothers of New York in 1950, so it would likely be after that date.
As I said previously, copies of banks like this have been widely-produced for collectors for many years. Hereās a couple from my collection, both produced in Taiwan and about 35 years old, although neither have any original manufacturer names or patent details as part of their castings.
Upvote
2
Red-Coat
Gold Member
Good luck, and please keep us posted.
You might also try contacting the āMechanical Bank Collectors of Americaā to see if they can shed any light on your find:
https://www.mechanicalbanks.org/
Thereās an email contact given as: [email protected]
Last edited:
Upvote
1
Top Member Reactions
-
3474 -
1986 -
1687 -
1443 -
1191 -
1186 -
932 -
920 -
826 -
795 -
618 -
611 -
492 -
481 -
472 -
E
455
-
409 -
390 -
357 -
346
