Clovis-point #2

Jbenson

Jr. Member
Dec 25, 2018
51
107
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • F61BA5BB-9897-49B1-957E-0043727681EF.jpeg
    F61BA5BB-9897-49B1-957E-0043727681EF.jpeg
    805.8 KB · Views: 172
  • 075BDB9B-9CE8-4CF7-AAFC-D37666062135.jpeg
    075BDB9B-9CE8-4CF7-AAFC-D37666062135.jpeg
    842.8 KB · Views: 147
  • 944F7EFC-6713-41B8-A82B-6F2EC1D0BA7D.jpeg
    944F7EFC-6713-41B8-A82B-6F2EC1D0BA7D.jpeg
    570.7 KB · Views: 156
  • EE22D413-5111-406E-AAB6-D833F7CEB37B.jpeg
    EE22D413-5111-406E-AAB6-D833F7CEB37B.jpeg
    564.8 KB · Views: 170
  • 7A634C83-8B81-4C81-AE46-35BD56756939.jpeg
    7A634C83-8B81-4C81-AE46-35BD56756939.jpeg
    671 KB · Views: 213
Upvote 0
Definitely a Texas Clovis. It could have been picked up by a different culture and worked from a broke into a knife form.
 

Thx. I hear TX Clovis point are common. Is that correct?
 

Relicgrubber is on to something there.

My guess is that someone (I agree, likely a later group) might have savaged a broken/impact factured point. That’s some interesting workmanship along the heavily reworked side.
 

Thx. I hear TX Clovis point are common. Is that correct?

Big state, resource rich (in paleo times and today), combined with erosion in the west and a favorable collector conditions means that lots more have been found there than in Maine for example. But the densest Clovis concentration of Clovis sites are in other areas.
 

I saw a pic once of a "notched" Clovis. A later culture had found it and notched it to haft it the way they were used to.
 

Can I ask the Texas folks-I’ve read that some perendales points are often exhausted into what looks like I’ve posted. Are there any things to look for between a pere and Clovis in terms of basal treatment?
 

I’ve been told that this is a Folsom. What do you think?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top