Carved Horn Scrimshaw - The Holy Graile?

Lucky Eddie

Sr. Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
358
Reaction score
188
Golden Thread
0
Anyone know the history of this piece?

What I do know is this.

It has been in my family now for 4 or 5 generations (My Great Great grandmothers) and originated in England.
The surviving family knowledge went like this.
My grandmother emigrated to Australia from England in 1901.
Her grandmother as a child was an indentured servant in a manor house for most of her life.
In that house, above a fire place & hearth, hung on a silken chord was a green hunting horn.
Great Great Grandmothers job included dusting, with a feather duster.

The old man who owned the Manor house passed away - and the house and contents were to be auctioned, proceeeds to be split between the surviving family heirs.

While cleaning the house prior to auction my great great grandmother was in her early teens and happened to dust the green hunting horn - during which, the fragile silken chord weakened from years of rising heat from the fireplace, broke.
The green hunting horn, fell to the brick hearth - and broke / shattered.
Hidden (secreted within) inside this green hunting horn, was the carved cow horn piece you see below.

The Lady of the house came to investigate the sound of the breaking horn and was rather annoyed. She claimed she never liked the hunting horn anyway and her deceased father obtained it at an auction - she instructed my great great grandmother to keep the piece from within as a parting "gift" for her service which was likely coming to an end with the sale of the house.

Thus this piece of carved cow horn history of unknown age and prevenance, has remained within my family ever since.
I always romanticized that it was associated with the Holy Grail Romances of the middle ages.

Hornpic1.jpg


I took a series of photos all around and pieced them together roughly with MS paint to get an all round story board of the carvings to see if they relate a particular story or period of time in history?

HornArtifactStoryboard2.jpg


I see things like St George slaying the dragoon, I see the 7 headed "beast of revelations" - I see our lady of Blind Justice standing over a wolf with a sword ready to defeat evil.

I see a one eyed king?... (King Harold?) (In the Sun representation - the veiled face "moon" being his queen)?

There sat Harold,
on his horse.
his hawk in his hand,
and an arrow in his eye!

Who is the saracen type head, carved in bass relief style - totally different to the rest of the carving style?

What about the rest of you - anyone have any ideas what story/s are represented here? - why the anchient piece spent so long secreted within a hunting horn, hung over a mantlepiece?
Why was it secreted - to hide it from the inquisition?

Most such carvings (scrimshaw) I have seen of later periods, are maritime scenes done into ivory whales tooth / Walrus tooth - not cow horn.

I've not ever been able to find out any details - my parent once on a trip to England in the 1970's took it to the London Museum of Mankind - who weren't particularly interested and thought maybe it originatyed in eastern europe somewhere?

Could it represent Arthurian legend? Lancelot & Guenevere?, what about King Richard the Lionheart - didn't he have a Loyal Saracen friend when he returned from the crusades?

That's about as much as I know! Overall length is about 4 inches and average diameter about 2 inches.
Who knows - maybe it's a treasure map story of some kind?
It seems to be involved with the dynasty of a king, queen and family and church.
Could it be masonic/templar in origin - and referring to the preservation of Christs titular bloodline, as is preserved to this day by the Prieurre de Sion?
I've wondered about this piece now for almost 50 years.
If it was a cup at any period - it may have had maybe a wooden insert as a base sealed with wax or something - In all the time We've had it - it never had any bottom - more like it might have been a decorative ceremonial rolled cloth napkin holder for placement on the table?

Anyone?

Cheers
 

Upvote 0
Ohhhh - kayyyy!

Why not?

It's not any more far fetched than anything I've submitted!

There's a definite similarity with the feathers, can't deny that!

Gotta admit, Pocahontas is one I'd never considered.!

Hey that engraving of her - ain't so flattering when you look at it.....she was - well kinda ..... butt ugly for an indian princess! ;D

I'd always imagined what Pocahontas looked like, in my imagination - and I have to say - it wasn't anything like that - this experience has sure ruined Pocahontas for me! :tongue3:

Ohh well.

Cheers
 

Upvote 0
Here's another bit of info:

8. Papal legate/Bishop with Sword of Damocles hanging above his head.

The sword through or above the bishop's mitre is a symbol representing the murder of Thomas Becket in 1170. He was canonized in 1173 by the Catholic church as a martyr.

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
I have been following this thread, quite interesting! I would like to see the piece in question. The story while far fetched rings true to me. I love trying to figure historical puzzles out. I would put the horn under blacklight to see if anything was scrimshawed and not filled with ink. Possibly inside a carving that you can see.

Please post more pics. Especially close ups if possible. Thanks and good luck.
 

Upvote 0
Great Find Dc Matt!

I knew nothing of the tale of Beckett although I've heard his name mentioned at times.

You can see from the detail on wickepedia, about how he was murdered and the fatal stroke delivered as described by the only surviving witness Grim - that the sword depicted across the top of the head, is entirely accurate.

Whats great about this find is this!

This we know, the period of history depicted is "post norman" i.e. After the Battle of Hastings 1066 with King Harold and somewhere also after Thomas a Becketts death on 29 December 1170...

So we have two "characters" perhaps, from "close time periods".

Does that mean that some of the other characters are from a similar period?

Could the Knight be NOT St George - but another of the Grail Romance Knights of King Arthurs court - Sir Lancelot maybe?
(Or Godfroi de boullion? who took Jerusalem

Wickepedia
c. 1060, – 18 July 1100) was a medieval Frankish knight who was one of the leaders of the First Crusade from 1096 until his death. He was the Lord of Bouillon, from which he took his byname, from 1076 and the Duke of Lower Lorraine from 1087. After the capture of Jerusalem in 1099, Godfrey became the first ruler of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, although he did not use the title "king".

He was the second son of Eustace II, Count of Boulogne, and Ida of Lorraine (daughter of Godfrey III, Duke of Lower Lorraine and his wife, Doda[1]) and never married.[2]

It seems we have another "character maybe" from a similar time period (1100)AD.

What about the 2 women?

Wickepedia
Joan of Acre (April 1272 – 23 April 1307) was the daughter of King Edward I of England and Eleanor of Castile.[2] She is most notable for her marriage to Ralph de Monthermer and the claim that miracles have allegedly taken place at her grave. She is also notable for the multiple references of her in literature.

There are probably other clues out there but I really like this Thomas A Beckett one because it jives with the other clues and rough dates thus far.

So in summary we COULD have so far:-

King Harold round 1066
Thomas a Beckett 1170
Knight Godfroi of Bullion 18 July 1100

3 characters so far within 104 years of each other....

MAYBE Jeane of Acre 1307 - but I doubt it......

Lets see what we find eh? - good work guys indeed.

More photos is a slight problem at this point in time.

Many thanks!
 

Upvote 0
Something else interesting also occurs to me, well 2 points really!

1. The circular motif on the queen with crossed sword and arrow on her breast that is on her dress in the lower part & similar circular motifes, on the body of "the beast of revelations" (until we find out who that character really is / represents.

These circular motifs are ALL DIFFERENT!

Why go to that detail - to make them all different & what do they mean if anything?

If they have no meaning why go to the trouble of depicting them all differently - why not just a heap of decorative circles all the same (that's what I would do!).

2. The Lady With Scales of Justice,standing over the dog/beats on its back..
Could this symbolise maybe that Henry 2nd and the 4 knights responsible for killing Becket will eventually be brought to justice?
Were the rest of the crew depicted also likewise all killed "unjustly" - all part of a particular family bloodline?

Just me thinking out loud.....after 50 years at it you'd reckonI'd be tired of it by now eh? The Thomas Beckett Clue I would nevr have found.

Is Guy Fawkes anywhere in there? when was he around?

No Robin Hood, no Lion of Richard the Lionheart, No Prince John. No friar Tuck,..... it seems to be more about actual history maybe than legend.

Could the sun and moon figures have been beheaded maybe?...thus the depiction of just heads? (French King and Marie Antionette and their family/children?

Man this thing makes my brain spin- really!

Ohh- I once uploaded those pics to the UK Antiques Roadshow website - and never heard anything more about it - presumably if it had any real value, the Museum of mankind in London where it was taken in the 1970's - would have jumped at the chance to keep it - My Parents had no idea what it was, more than I do and told them that if it had any significant historical value they could keep it for display - but as said - they declared in middle eastern, maybe 1800's sometime and to write to some museum in Jugoslavia (or was it Budapest?).

I did track down the museum they suggested on the internet and emailed them with the photos but it was all in english and I never got any reply back.

I don't believe it has maybe any real value other than the fun of working out what the overall story is and who the cast of characters are - its like a history puzzle to solve.

I tried emailing scrimshaw web sites in England with pics - non showed any interest or replied.

Trust me if it was valuable someone would have been after it bye now.

Cheers
 

Upvote 0
One more thing.

I am assuming it is cow horn we always just assumed that it is.

Could it actually be ivory from a whales tooth or a walruses tooth - with the top cut off to make it into the tapered cylinder we see for some functional purpose (like holding a cotton / linen napkin)?

I'm still "curious" as to what it IS (if anything) i.e. what its function was!

Cheers
 

Upvote 0
Another minor detail.

My dad who's deceased (10 01 1931 - 01 01 2005) was the one who identified "who I think is King Harold from the battle of hastings in 1066 - with the "one eye".

He used to tell the poem I quoted about Harold when I was a kid.

My mother corrected me on the poem.

Dad used to say it with a made up english cockney type accent where the H's are dropped - not pronounced.

Apparently dad learned it at school as a way to remember the battle of Hastings of 1066 as a kid - sort of an aide memoire.

He would pronounce the poem thus in his made up cockney english "accent".

There sat
'arold,
On 'is 'orse.

'Is 'awk
in his 'and
an' 'is eye
full a arra!

He would explain to us things like - "Harolds hawk" - being not a hunting hawk as i had assumed as a kid, but in fact his battle shield - shaped like a stone masons "hawk" or (hod) board with handle that he carried mortar on ready to apply to a wall for rendering. He said a shield was derived from a hawk or hod and thus battle shields were referred to as hawks.

Apparently his rendition of the poem was supposed to be humorous (it was lost on me) - he always laughed at it - it seemed to please him greatly to relate it. Because of the pronunciation I guess. It amused him!

He had other little funny "dirty ditties" he'd repeat from time to time - most quite rude! (and not suitable for publishing here)!

His mum would always tell him off for being impolite in company with hsi little rhymes, but really this only encouraged him more...and grandmah knew it, really she was just goading him to say a few more.

Sorry - reminiscing (out loud) - they are all gone now (Apart from my 77 year old mum) I'm the oldest surviving member of the family now. This horn came from my dads side of the family.

You've no idea how much they would have loved to have known the details we have today via the internet about Thomas A Beckett! That would have livened up a family dinner and discussion for a couple or 3 Christmases - there was no TV back in those days - we'd sit round the piano and sing and wonder about the characters on the cow horn - sort of a family treasure / heir loom.

If you knew the hours I've invested into trying to find out about the thing.

Thomas A Beckett eh - I'm really chuffed about that break thru. I'll probably dream all night and get no sleep now!

Cheers
 

Upvote 0
her dress in the lower part & similar circular motifes, on the body of "the beast

I'm guessing these "circular motifs" represent gemstones. Each type of gemstone had it's own symbolism in the middle ages. Note the one on the robe is has rays of brilliance emanating from it. Possibly a diamond? If so, that would date your piece later than 12th or 13th C.

Not to be Freudian, but lets get back to the breastfeeding... It is significant that the character appears to be touching or pushing the breast towards the child. Do some reading on "Madonna Lactans". There were times when art had no breast showing, breast with touching, and breast without touching creating controversy in the church at the time. This character is touching which might indictate a later time period.

Also, the wolf under the feet of Justitia could be representative of Satan (middle ages Catholic symbolism).

Still researching (I like this one...) ;D

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
Thanks Matt - your really good at this stuff - you probably went to college or something! :icon_thumright: :icon_thumleft:

The Jewels thing is probably right on!

I'll go back and look at the breast feeding - that got past me last time - I'm on it like white on rice now tho!

More cheers!
 

Upvote 0
Ok,

Now I'm a self confessed boob man froma long way but (and I like big Butts & I cannot lie &a iddy biddy grin, as she walks in etc etc)

For the life a me I can't see any breast feeding going on here...

First the kids backs to mom so unless it has "a neck like a fricken giraffe" (old punchline from a joke) then no way's its getting its lips on them puppies! Maybe shes a wet nurse princess or something coz she's either got some cleavage going on there or the worlds biggest diamond around her neck (them ear rings ain't too shabby neither!).

Now - the kids 2 hands are Left One reaching up to moms hair just under her crown and Right one resting omit own tummy.
Moms hands then are:- Right one wrapped around Kid and onto his her hip. Left one reaches down to the kids left thigh area in front of Moms tummy.

If that's not a ginormous diamond we got happening there and is indeed cleavage, then this gals Dolly Partons predecessor, and has the 2 pints a day gene!

Strike one for the puppies IMHO!

Oh and the queen - her hands are holding both the point of the sword and the point of the arrow - seems like a really weird way to carry them - likely to get one hurt!

Can't think of any ceremony where that was done cept maybe makin Jean Of Acre carry them that way as punishment before burning her alive at the stake- but she was just a kid 16 or something when burnt, this queen seems some how older than that!

Cheers!
 

Upvote 0
You cannot date a piece from the images on it. Except to say it is from a time after a depicted event. I have powder horns from the 1880 period with revolutionary war motifs on them. To the untrained eye it appears to be older than it is.

The pictures that you posted make deciphering the carvings next to impossible. This is due to the fact that you have to look at the pictures both as individual images as well as how they are in relationship to each other.
 

Upvote 0
DCMatt said:
Here's another bit of info:

8. Papal legate/Bishop with Sword of Damocles hanging above his head.

The sword through or above the bishop's mitre is a symbol representing the murder of Thomas Becket in 1170. He was canonized in 1173 by the Catholic church as a martyr.

DCMatt

And here he is in the Woodchester Catholic church. Complete with sword through the head...

4224612303_2d25d5d86d.jpg


DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
For the life a me I can't see any breast feeding going on here...

You need to look at Madonna Lactans from the time period. The child in close proximity to the bare breast implies feeding (caring/good mother...). Mary's mothering of the Christ child was important in the middle ages and gave rise to numerous "milk shrines" including one at Walsingham, England established in the 12th C.

I FINALLY saw the left hand and it is NOT touching. (Need better pics...) Again, I suggest you read about Madonna Lactans to understand the symbolism and possible relationship to a time frame.

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
You mentioned believing this item does not have any value. This isn't the case because I'd buy it from you. Whatever the surface (barring plastic :o) and despite the discoloration, the handiwork is exceptional and the composition -- which has this great Picasso quality -- can't be beat. Get a museum to take a second look. Try the Hull Museum in England. Good people and I've sent a client there before:

Hull Museums
Ferens Art Gallery
Queen Victoria Square
Kingston-upon-Hull
HU1 3RA

Email: museums@hullcc.gov.uk
Tel: (01482) 300300
Fax: (01482) 613710

Technical and specialist enquiries: (01482) 613902
 

Upvote 0
I apologise for being rude about the picture quality. I am interested in seeing museum quality close ups. This is for I.D. purposes only as I would never purchase such an item sight unseen. Thanks.
 

Upvote 0
Here is an example of the "Devil Dog" depicted on your piece. It is an Illumination from a bible circa 1470's. The human figure is St. Petronilla.

devildog1.webp

DCMatt
 

Upvote 0
Very interesting piece, hope you have an expert appraise it and let us know. Even if it is a fake or real it is still a nice mantle piece.
 

Upvote 0
rodgerdodger said:
When I saw this I thought of the legend of Pocahontas.
The upper half is her life with her tribe and the lower half is her life in England.
Look at the slide show and 8 & 9 the feathers on there heads are the same.

:icon_thumright: That was the way I was going when I said maybe it came from America - or maybe it was carved by someone who had seen depictions of these Native Americans. It seems so farfetched with all the much earlier British history imagery. But that warrior on the horse and the faces on the beast just look so different.

The seven headed beast legend is in the Native American lore too.

I'm going to throw this out just b/c it struck me (the circles). This is a picture of the mantle of Powhatan. He was the Chief who was the father of Pocahontas.

One of Powhatan's actual cloaks, made of deerskin, decorated with "roanoke" (shell beads). Powhatan presented his old cloak and shoes to the English, after his "coronation" ceremony, as an exchange for those they had put on him. It made its way back to England, where it is still preserved in the Ashmolean Museum, of Oxford. The circles represent the chief towns of the tribes Powhatan controlled. Before some of the shells came off, there were 34 circles.


powhatan-mantle_edited.jpg
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom