Broken knee
Bronze Member
- Dec 12, 2009
- 1,893
- 738
- Detector(s) used
- excal 2
Fisher F75 SE
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Can some one ID this 2 piece button?
Thanks HH
Broken Knee
Thanks HH
Broken Knee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes it was 2 piece the iron back is partially there.Iron Patch said:Are you sure it's 2 piece? Pretty typical design of Charles II.
http://foundintheground.com/photos/stuart/picture1882.aspx
Broken knee said:yes it was 2 piece the iron back is partially there.Iron Patch said:Are you sure it's 2 piece? Pretty typical design of Charles II.
http://foundintheground.com/photos/stuart/picture1882.aspx
Broken Knee
Broken knee said:I think you guy's are right, in looking at it it is quite thick and it doesn't appear to have a folded over rim like a standard 2 piece. Also it does look more like crud than rust I'll give it a HP bath maybe it will help Thanks HH
Broken Knee
Iron Patch said:Broken knee said:yes it was 2 piece the iron back is partially there.Iron Patch said:Are you sure it's 2 piece? Pretty typical design of Charles II.
http://foundintheground.com/photos/stuart/picture1882.aspx
Broken Knee
Cru should be very familiar with those. I still think it's old, but what you're seeing is really hard crud and the small bit of iron left over from what linked the links together. Not something we find here, but definitely they do in the UK, probably in some good numbers too. It might have had a pewter filled back, but not two piece, at least in the sense we usually use.
I've seen these many time but always from the front.
Broken knee said:So are these rare or just rare here?
Thanks, Broken Knee
IP I don't want to sound dumb, but Is this the only one to have been found or posted here?Iron Patch said:Broken knee said:So are these rare or just rare here?
Thanks, Broken Knee
Just rare there.
Broken knee said:IP I don't want to sound dumb, but Is this the only one to have been found or posted here?Iron Patch said:Broken knee said:So are these rare or just rare here?
Thanks, Broken Knee
Just rare there.
BK
Iron Patch said:Thanks, I guess I'll take that as if i don't find the other half I wont find another!!Broken knee said:Iron Patch said:IP I don't want to sound dumb, but Is this the only one to have been found or posted here?Broken knee said:Just rare there.
BK
That's a very good question. Most on here don't have sites old enough to find something like that with the some exceptions... Don (SJ), Timekiller, GW digger, and Bill in VA are some. I don't recall any posted but that doesn't mean they weren't.
My last question is why am I not finding the silver it's got to be there some ware? I cant believe all the other people that hit this site got it all and missed the large coppers and relics I've found. I'm stumped
Broken Knee
Broken knee said:Iron Patch said:Thanks, I guess I'll take that as if i don't find the other half I wont find another!!Broken knee said:Iron Patch said:IP I don't want to sound dumb, but Is this the only one to have been found or posted here?Broken knee said:Just rare there.
BK
That's a very good question. Most on here don't have sites old enough to find something like that with the some exceptions... Don (SJ), Timekiller, GW digger, and Bill in VA are some. I don't recall any posted but that doesn't mean they weren't.
My last question is why am I not finding the silver it's got to be there some ware? I cant believe all the other people that hit this site got it all and missed the large coppers and relics I've found. I'm stumped
Broken Knee
Because old silver isn't out there in great numbers, just posted on this website in great numbers. There's plenty of other killer finds that can turn up besides silver so I wouldn't worry about it. I don't find as many as I used to but doesn't bother me at all.
Wow, are you guy's still mad about the marriage sorry. Cru this cuff link came from the same site as the coin weight I posted you ID it as 1610 James 1 for the gold half angel. I appreciate your in put, Thanks HHCRUSADER said:OK, firstly its a cufflink & secondly the 17th century association with the Marriage of King Charles II (1660s cufflinks were not in fashion) is someones best guess which has gained a life of its own. I believe these to be late 18th C & the evidence for the late 17th century cufflinks that came into fashion were 2 distinct types (not this one). Plus evidence from the Thames contexts argue against this being 17th C. But there are as many for the theory as against it, & my view is just another against, so you will have to base your judgement on other clues from the site etc...