🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Bullet ID

ncsuwolf

Full Member
Jul 21, 2024
206
301
Can anyone help id this bullet? Found in western chesterfield county va. Several other 3 ring Minnie balls and round balls found at same site. Dia. .571”, length 1.01”
IMG_3083.jpeg
IMG_3084.jpeg
IMG_3085.jpeg
IMG_3082.jpeg
 

One additional piece of info, that may help…..when found the base was full of what I assume was black powder, which makes me think arsenal made, not field made.
 

Upvote 0
I may be wrong, and probably am, but I think it is a more modern muzzle loading bullet. I am basing that on the unusually flat top.
That’s what several have told me, but the fact it came from the middle of 25+ other period bullets makes me think otherwise. However, you your point I did dig a 5 gallon bucket of shotgun shell brass in the midst of it all. The flat point is what has everyone confused. I think nose cast bullet that got cut extra deep?
 

Upvote 0
Most, if not all of the period nose cast bullets I looked up were more rounded from the grooves to the flat tip. I hope someone more knowledgeable can properly ID it for you.
 

Upvote 1
.58 caliber 3 ringer. Civil war union round. Pretty odd to see the flat tip, but many times soldiers modified them during times of boredom.
 

Upvote 0
Ncsuwolf, at this point, your mystery bullet's visible characteristics (notably, the extra-wide spacing of the body-grooves) AND the measurements you gave us match up with a "Lyman Mold" reproduction Minie-bullet for modernday blackpowder-rifle shooters.

Its .575-inch diameter is especially troublesome for what is supposed to be an actual Original civil war .58-caliber Minie-bullet. If you check various civil war bullet reference books, you'll see that the typical .58 Minie's diameter MINUS several hundredths-of-an-inch of lead-oxide patina is .570 or less. (Most civil war bullets that are pictured in the bullet-books are dug/excavated specimens, and still have the usual thick lead-oxide patina on them, so you MUST subtract the patina's thickness to know the bullet's original "as manufactured" diameter.)

The solution to the mystery will be found when you post several well-focused closeup photos of your mystery bullet's base cavity. The Lyman Mold repro 3-ring/groove Mine has a very deep, very wide "Paraboloid" cavity. That means that when you view the bullet's rim from the bottom, it looks a lot thinner than what is seen on a typical yankee "3-ringer."

I said the phrase "Paraboloid" cavity. Look up the meaning of "parabola" shape.

Put simply, in a typical cone-cavity Minie, the walls of the cavity are straight. (Shaped like a pencil-point after you sharpen it.) In a Parabola cavity, the walls are curved outward. For example, the nose of most Minie-bullets is a parabola shape.

If your mystery-bullet, which has extra-wide spacing between the grooves/rings, has an extra-large cavity which is Paraboloid shaped, it is a Lyman Mold repro. If your bullet has any of the "typical" Minie-bullet cavities, it is an 1864-65 era CS-made original civil war bullet, whose nose is unusually short and flat-tipped (and sunken-in a bit at the tip) because the person who cast the bullet did not quite fill the mold completely with the molten lead. (Note, that is also true if it is a Lyman Mold repro.... it is what we modern bullet-casters call a "short-pour" error bullet.

The photo attached below shows several versions of Lyman Mold repro bullets. Note, because TreasureNet's software trims off the edges of these "thumbnail" posted pics, you MUST CLICK ON IT to see the full image. if you don't click it, you can't see what I'm talking about. At far left is the Lyman Mold version of the 3-groove/3-ring Minie-bullet. Its .575" diameter is the same as your bullet. Note the extra-wide spacing of the rings/grooves, and also, the very short bottom ring. The 2nd bullet is the Lyman version of a Confederate Gardner 2-groove Minie-bullet.

Hoping this info is helpful,
TheCannonballGuy
 

Attachments

  • bulletmold_REPRODUCTION_Lyman-Mold-58caliber_3groove-and-2groove_575213-and-577611_Trackofthew...jpg
    bulletmold_REPRODUCTION_Lyman-Mold-58caliber_3groove-and-2groove_575213-and-577611_Trackofthew...jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 13
Upvote 8
Ncsuwolf, at this point, your mystery bullet's visible characteristics (notably, the extra-wide spacing of the body-grooves) AND the measurements you gave us match up with a "Lyman Mold" reproduction Minie-bullet for modernday blackpowder-rifle shooters.

Its .575-inch diameter is especially troublesome for what is supposed to be an actual Original civil war .58-caliber Minie-bullet. If you check various civil war bullet reference books, you'll see that the typical .58 Minie's diameter MINUS several hundredths-of-an-inch of lead-oxide patina is .570 or less. (Most civil war bullets that are pictured in the bullet-books are dug/excavated specimens, and still have the usual thick lead-oxide patina on them, so you MUST subtract the patina's thickness to know the bullet's original "as manufactured" diameter.)

The solution to the mystery will be found when you post several well-focused closeup photos of your mystery bullet's base cavity. The Lyman Mold repro 3-ring/groove Mine has a very deep, very wide "Paraboloid" cavity. That means that when you view the bullet's rim from the bottom, it looks a lot thinner than what is seen on a typical yankee "3-ringer."

I said the phrase "Paraboloid" cavity. Look up the meaning of "parabola" shape.

Put simply, in a typical cone-cavity Minie, the walls of the cavity are straight. (Shaped like a pencil-point after you sharpen it.) In a Parabola cavity, the walls are curved outward. For example, the nose of most Minie-bullets is a parabola shape.

If your mystery-bullet, which has extra-wide spacing between the grooves/rings, has an extra-large cavity which is Paraboloid shaped, it is a Lyman Mold repro. If your bullet has any of the "typical" Minie-bullet cavities, it is an 1864-65 era CS-made original civil war bullet, whose nose is unusually short and flat-tipped (and sunken-in a bit at the tip) because the person who cast the bullet did not quite fill the mold completely with the molten lead. (Note, that is also true if it is a Lyman Mold repro.... it is what we modern bullet-casters call a "short-pour" error bullet.

The photo attached below shows several versions of Lyman Mold repro bullets. Note, because TreasureNet's software trims off the edges of these "thumbnail" posted pics, you MUST CLICK ON IT to see the full image. if you don't click it, you can't see what I'm talking about. At far left is the Lyman Mold version of the 3-groove/3-ring Minie-bullet. Its .575" diameter is the same as your bullet. Note the extra-wide spacing of the rings/grooves, and also, the very short bottom ring. The 2nd bullet is the Lyman version of a Confederate Gardner 2-groove Minie-bullet.

Hoping this info is helpful,
TheCannonballGuy
Wow….first, thank you very much for your in-depth response. I re-measure the piece, and depending on how it’s turned I get .573-.579. There is an odd (my opinion) ring within the skirt. I’ll add pics in a minute. One thing to add, which I mention earlier, when dug there was black powder still in the base, which make me think (I’m a novice) that it was a dropped paper round, which means arsenal. Not sure if repro rounds came wrapped in paper. Additional note, I found an almost identical ball online ( repro). Dixie gun works ba1103. I have reached out to them to see if they used a historical pattern for their mold, or if to your point in the Lyman model. Regardless of how it turns out, much appreciated.
 

Upvote 2
Wow….first, thank you very much for your in-depth response. I re-measure the piece, and depending on how it’s turned I get .573-.579. There is an odd (my opinion) ring within the skirt. I’ll add pics in a minute. One thing to add, which I mention earlier, when dug there was black powder still in the base, which make me think (I’m a novice) that it was a dropped paper round, which means arsenal. Not sure if repro rounds came wrapped in paper. Additional note, I found an almost identical ball online ( repro). Dixie gun works ba1103. I have reached out to them to see if they used a historical pattern for their mold, or if to your point in the Lyman model. Regardless of how it turns out, much appreciated.
Ncsuwolf, at this point, your mystery bullet's visible characteristics (notably, the extra-wide spacing of the body-grooves) AND the measurements you gave us match up with a "Lyman Mold" reproduction Minie-bullet for modernday blackpowder-rifle shooters.

Its .575-inch diameter is especially troublesome for what is supposed to be an actual Original civil war .58-caliber Minie-bullet. If you check various civil war bullet reference books, you'll see that the typical .58 Minie's diameter MINUS several hundredths-of-an-inch of lead-oxide patina is .570 or less. (Most civil war bullets that are pictured in the bullet-books are dug/excavated specimens, and still have the usual thick lead-oxide patina on them, so you MUST subtract the patina's thickness to know the bullet's original "as manufactured" diameter.)

The solution to the mystery will be found when you post several well-focused closeup photos of your mystery bullet's base cavity. The Lyman Mold repro 3-ring/groove Mine has a very deep, very wide "Paraboloid" cavity. That means that when you view the bullet's rim from the bottom, it looks a lot thinner than what is seen on a typical yankee "3-ringer."

I said the phrase "Paraboloid" cavity. Look up the meaning of "parabola" shape.

Put simply, in a typical cone-cavity Minie, the walls of the cavity are straight. (Shaped like a pencil-point after you sharpen it.) In a Parabola cavity, the walls are curved outward. For example, the nose of most Minie-bullets is a parabola shape.

If your mystery-bullet, which has extra-wide spacing between the grooves/rings, has an extra-large cavity which is Paraboloid shaped, it is a Lyman Mold repro. If your bullet has any of the "typical" Minie-bullet cavities, it is an 1864-65 era CS-made original civil war bullet, whose nose is unusually short and flat-tipped (and sunken-in a bit at the tip) because the person who cast the bullet did not quite fill the mold completely with the molten lead. (Note, that is also true if it is a Lyman Mold repro.... it is what we modern bullet-casters call a "short-pour" error bullet.

The photo attached below shows several versions of Lyman Mold repro bullets. Note, because TreasureNet's software trims off the edges of these "thumbnail" posted pics, you MUST CLICK ON IT to see the full image. if you don't click it, you can't see what I'm talking about. At far left is the Lyman Mold version of the 3-groove/3-ring Minie-bullet. Its .575" diameter is the same as your bullet. Note the extra-wide spacing of the rings/grooves, and also, the very short bottom ring. The 2nd bullet is the Lyman version of a Confederate Gardner 2-groove Minie-bullet.

Hoping this info is helpful,
TheCannonballGuy
Here are the pics….. cavity is ~.421 deep. One picture shows total cavity, the other is powder I didn’t clean well
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3090.jpeg
    IMG_3090.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 24
  • IMG_3091.jpeg
    IMG_3091.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 23
Upvote 2
Ncsuwolf, thank you for the effort of making and posting the excellent well-focused closeup photos I requested. They enable me to say with certainty, your bullet is NOT a Lyman-Mold repro.

I am not familiar with the Dixie Gun Works repro minie you mentioned. But I'll still say, in my opinion your bullet is an original Confederate-made Minie-bullet. Since I can't find a match for it (even taking the "short-pour" miscast nose into account) in any of the civil war bullet ID books I own, it seems to be a late-war version, not produced in large numbers. The "short-pour" casting error indicates it was made in-the-field by soldiers, not at an arsenal.

There is one other bullet-book I have not checked for your bullet. Its title is Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four" by Dean S. Thomas. It is huge (several hundred pages, with several dozen bullets per page. At this time, I am too ill to even go find the book, which is in storage somewhere in my house. (See this post: https://www.treasurenet.com/threads...-for-the-what-is-it-forums-id-helpers.698123/ )

Hopefully somebody else here owns a copy of "Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four."
 

Last edited:
Upvote 6
Ncsuwolf, thank you for the effort of making and posting the excellent well-focused closeup photos I requested. They enable me to say with certainty, your bullet is NOT a Lyman-Mold repro.

I am not familiar with the Dixie Gun Works repro minie you mentioned. But I'll still say, in my opinion your bullet is an original Confederate-made Minie-bullet. Since I can't find a match for it (even taking the "short-pour" miscast nose into account) in any of the civil war bullet ID books I own, it seems to be a late-war version, not produced in large numbers. The "short-pour" casting error indicates it was made in-the-field by soldiers, not at an arsenal.

There is one other bullet-book I have not checked for your bullet. Its title is Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four" by Dean S. Thomas. It is huge (several hundred pages, with several dozen bullets per page. At this time, I am too ill to even go find the book, which is in storage somewhere in my house. (See this post: https://www.treasurenet.com/threads...-for-the-what-is-it-forums-id-helpers.698123/ )

Hopefully somebody else here owns a copy of "Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four.
Many thanks. I have looked through every bullet book I have as well, along with showing to folks who know these things, and no luck……thus the reason for me being here.
 

Upvote 0
Ncsuwolf, thank you for the effort of making and posting the excellent well-focused closeup photos I requested. They enable me to say with certainty, your bullet is NOT a Lyman-Mold repro.

I am not familiar with the Dixie Gun Works repro minie you mentioned. But I'll still say, in my opinion your bullet is an original Confederate-made Minie-bullet. Since I can't find a match for it (even taking the "short-pour" miscast nose into account) in any of the civil war bullet ID books I own, it seems to be a late-war version, not produced in large numbers. The "short-pour" casting error indicates it was made in-the-field by soldiers, not at an arsenal.

There is one other bullet-book I have not checked for your bullet. Its title is Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four" by Dean S. Thomas. It is huge (several hundred pages, with several dozen bullets per page. At this time, I am too ill to even go find the book, which is in storage somewhere in my house. (See this post: https://www.treasurenet.com/threads...-for-the-what-is-it-forums-id-helpers.698123/ )

Hopefully somebody else here owns a copy of "Round Ball To Rimfire: Part Four."
One final question…..and I apologize for asking so much, am I wrong in assuming the black powder in the base came from a paper cartridge? Found several drops the same way at same site. Did soldiers in the field make paper cartridges, or were they simply loose ball and powder?
 

Upvote 1

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top