Basic History: When People Are Disarmed, They Become Slaves

Attachments

  • 534513_430921570306484_113946037_n.webp
    534513_430921570306484_113946037_n.webp
    67.7 KB · Views: 92
Last edited:
Come on Stock Picker, you're the one that spoke up wondering if everyone knew about long arms. So that us ignorant, unwashed rednecks are on the same page with you, you teach us the traditional difference between rifle, musket and carbine. Traditionally, can a musket be a carbine? Or can a carbine be a musket? You're the one that says question everything, so I'm questioning you, tell us the difference.
 

He can't Bosn...he's been banned! (someone paste that to him, he has me ignored lol)
 

Last edited:
BosnMate said:
Come on Stock Picker, you're the one that spoke up wondering if everyone knew about long arms. So that us ignorant, unwashed rednecks are on the same page with you, you teach us the traditional difference between rifle, musket and carbine. Traditionally, can a musket be a carbine? Or can a carbine be a musket? You're the one that says question everything, so I'm questioning you, tell us the difference.

Stock is on a timeout so he can't reply for awhile.....
 

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Prob best just to worry about yourself. Best.

You keep trying to play both sides of the fence.

In one post you say: "No one is coming to take your guns". THAT IS the liberal mantra.

The next post, you say: "I thought the liberal propaganda was saying `we are coming to take your guns'"

You KNOW that "no one is coming to take your guns" is a liberal statement. It was the mantra when they first started registering guns back in the late 60's (sparked by two political assassinations in about a year).

Liberals have always fallen for and repeated that line.

Anyone who is able to think can see that it isn't true. They ARE coming to take our guns.

Only a fool couldn't see it - and the politicians wouldn't admit to it. That goes for BOTH sides of the aisle.
 

You are just so.... awesome. I like what this Native American has to say.

I agree. Our failed immigration policies should warn America just what is in store if, once again, the residents of this country fail to enforce the border.

A bit off topic, oh purveyors of the residential schools. Oh Canada . . . your people have not yet stopped torturing my brothers, and yet you wish to tell people in America how to behave.

Red, the reason he doesn't object to abusive treatment of First Nations (Native Americans - We are First Nations as we were the first nations on this continent) as his government forces my young brothers into "residential schools" with all the sicko priests and other abusers of small children they could muster to do their job for them . . . destruction of the First Nations.
 

You are just so.... awesome. I like what this Native American has to say.

Thank you I'll accept the compliment.I like what he has to say too since I am Native American.Didnt see that one coming did you ?:laughing7:
 

People have the right to express their opinions to others, and if they feel strongly enough to
protest the issue, then good for them. Doesn't mean for one second that anyone has to
agree with them, but the right to freedom of speech is one of the very things so many good
men have died to protect.

Violent protests are another matter entirely.

Had hoped to find some interesting info to learn about on this
topic, but unfortunately it appears to be an exercise in "Definitionism"
among a few members. Just my 2 cents...an "Assault Weapon" will
ultimately be defined by whatever the US Gov't says it is, and I'm not so
sure that "reality" has anything to do with it.
 

Red, the reason he doesn't object to abusive treatment of First Nations (Native Americans - We are First Nations as we were the first nations on this continent) as his government forces my young brothers into "residential schools" with all the sicko priests and other abusers of small children they could muster to do their job for them . . . destruction of the First Nations.

Yup I see that Chad.I guess he put his foot in his mouth this time accusing me of being a bigot and a racist against Native Americans little knowing that he was talking to one:laughing9:Got to love amateur hour.
 

Thank you I'll accept the compliment.I like what he has to say too since I am Native American.Didnt see that one coming did you ?:laughing7:

Got proof? I can be "First Nation" on the internet!
 

Got proof? I can be "First Nation" on the internet!

Youre something else on the internet too and probably the same thing in person,no proof needed:sign10:
 

I'll take that as an insult...and yet another "umm no!" from you. Carry on.
 

Thats ok,I take anything you post as an insult.Makes us even.If you dish it out you best be prepared to take it.Nigolagwana yonega.
 

Got proof? I can be "First Nation" on the internet!

Reading comprehension not your big suit is it? Let me see if I can make it simple.

Native Americans - you guys say "tribes", we say "nations". I am Houma. That means I am a member of the "United Houmas Nation." One who is of Cherokee descent would be a member of the Cherokee Nation.

The United Houmas Nation is recognized as a sovereign nation by France. We have diplomatic relations dating back before Louisiana became a state or territory.

Native Americans were the "First Nations" here on Turtle Island - North America. Our Nations may live within the borders of Canada, The United States or Mexico.

I hope that I have cleared this up for you.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom