Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you study Cahokia in IL you will come to the conclusion that they were Aztecs that came from Mexico. Many of the artifacts from Cahokia look identical to Aztec artifacts. Google "Cahokia arrow point", then google "Aztec arrow point". They are the same. Cahokia was laid out as a city before it was built. It wasn't a small village that got larger. If featured a "wood henge", similar to Stone Hedge, which was their calendar. Also the huge mound they built. For whatever reason, a large group split from Mexico and came north around 600 AD. I don't see archaeologists pushing this idea, but I believe it's true. Gary
A lot of similarities, but Cahokia is about 300 years older than the Aztec culture. If one came from the other, it was Cahokia snow birds headed south for the winter.
That would put the migration *about* the time of the collapse of the Mayan civilization...
I lived in Cartersville for a year back in '67. My friends dad was the manager of the Etowah Indian Mounds. A small museum in a trailer at the time, but don't remember a temple. But yes, big dirt steps. There is also weird lights that show up from time to time over them. My fried said it was swamp gas, but I never saw a swamp.like i've posted before, there is a stone temple in N Georgia. National forest, guarded by the state, but a Cherokee native can and will show you the site. Also the mound builders near Cartersville, GA. mounds with steps that look like stone mounds, but dirt. These guys were 7 feet tall, black hair to their waist.
High school history books have gotten wrong since they were written, so have the PHD's.
Complete crap.
https://exploringrealhistory.blogspo...to-earths.html
Huge mound complexes were built here millenia before agriculture appeared.
Complete crap.
https://exploringrealhistory.blogspo...to-earths.html
Huge mound complexes were built here millenia before agriculture appeared.
300 years seems like a very short amount of time.
The Native Americans of Northern California believed that they all came from the north.
With groups splitting off along the way. Some continued south.
I would bet there were some words common to all of the various tribal languages.
I think everyone is confusing Aztec with other South/Central American groups. Aztecs and Mayans are always referred to due to their familiarity, but neither was the largest nor the longest-lived group.
If mass migration is the underlying theory of the populating of North America, first across the Bering Strait and then southward and eastward, what would stop a group from leaving South/Central America for undiscovered parts of what is now the U.S.? I would venture to guess that this happened frequently, and undoubtedly semblances of their culture would have accompanied them, because this was all they knew at the time. Either establishing new settlements or assimilating into existing settlements would probably also yield some sort of evidence, just as the Spanish influence was evident here (although theirs was done more by force and eradication).
Further, the physical landscape has changed tremendously over the past 10,000 years, and while there are some historical records depicting the actions of some Central American groups, what was undoubtedly lost will always be the missing link. For example, the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico, particularly in the Big Bend area (Apalachicola to Cedar Key), was 100 miles seaward. Recently, a 7,000 year old Archaic burial site was discovered off the coast, and I have personally witnessed tree stumps located in 40 feet of water, nearly 15 miles south of Dog Island, Florida. To theorize that there is a large number of undiscovered sites that are currently underwater is not a stretch.
As far as mound and effigy similarities, Cahokia is a great example, and so is the Letchworth Mound in Jefferson County, Florida.
Archaeologists may speculate, but few have been outspoken about the connection between the cultures of South/Central America and North America. Much of their research is built from previous assumptions or theories, and when those are challenged, the old guard comes out of the woodwork to defend their turf rather than admit they may have been wrong. The newer generation of archaeologists seem to have a more open mindset, so maybe we'll see some new studies emerge.
This is a depiction of the large mound at Letchworth, and to the layperson it resembles the architecture of South/Central America:
View attachment 1726608