At this moment in time

The rate of firearm-related homicides in Canada reached its lowest point in almost 50 years last year, according to new data.

In fact, of the 598 homicides reported in Canada in 2011, 35 per cent were stabbing-related, while 27 per cent were shooting-related, Statistics Canada reported Tuesday. Beatings and strangulations accounted for most of the remaining cases.

Overall, there were 44 more homicides nationwide in 2011 compared to the year before — the first increase in three years — with Alberta and Quebec driving the increase.

But while the homicide rate went up seven per cent last year, it has remained “relatively stable” over the past decade, Statistics Canada said.

Ron Melchers, a criminology professor at the University of Ottawa, said Tuesday the decline in the rate of firearm-related homicides — particularly involving rifles and shotguns — and the relatively stable rate of stabbings has been a long-term trend.

A lot of homicides are spur-of-the-moment between people who are drinking or involved in the drug trade and take place inside homes where knives are more easily accessible than firearms, he said.

A crackdown by police agencies on gangs and criminal organizations could also be having the effect of decreasing the demand for guns, he said.

Statistics Canada reported that the increase in homicides in 2011 was driven largely by two provinces: Alberta (which saw 32 more killings compared to the year before) and Quebec (which saw 21 more killings).

By contrast, the homicide rate in Ontario, which saw 28 fewer homicides in 2011, reached its lowest point since 1966.

Overall, Manitoba saw the highest homicide rate for the fifth year in a row, followed by Saskatchewan and Alberta.

The violence in the prairies can be attributed to a number of factors, including the migration of job-seeking young men “out west,” a higher-stakes drug trade, displacement from rural areas and increasingly marginalized populations — particularly from aboriginal communities — in urban centres, Melchers said.

There were 95 gang-related homicides in 2011, about the same as the year before. While gang–related homicides rose in the 1990s, it reached a peak in 2008 (that year saw 138 cases), and has since declined, Statistics Canada noted.

Homicide victims typically know their killers. Of the homicide cases solved in 2011, almost half of the victims were killed by an acquaintance or friend and one-third were killed by a family member. Only 15 per cent were killed by a stranger.

Police reported 89 homicides involving intimate partners in 2011. Thirty-six per cent of these cases involved married couples, another 36 per cent involved common-law couples and 26 per cent involved dating partners.

The rate of intimate-partner homicides has remained stable in recent years, Statistics Canada said.

Read more: http://www.canada.com/Firearm+relat...nada+reports/7651344/story.html#ixzz2LYJxMWPa
 

Shooting my mouth off huh? Much like you in opposition to our second amendment.....You are the one shooting your mouth off.....try shutting it.....if you have something valid and not demeaning to the United States or other members you are welcome to enter the discussion. You are serious in the statement you are not looking for a fight when you come on a thread about the second amendment and decry guns are bad and the govt should step up regulations .......how twisted! LOL!!!

Please take the time to read thorough this thread from start to finish and maybe you'll see what I'm getting at. I'll have you know that I am a dual citizen and am not against the 2ND. I just feel that the boys that drafted up the Constitution didn't have the advanced weaponry of today in mind when they did so. You know? The good old black powder dueling pistol days? Just for the record I do own firearms and have been shooting guns since I was strong enough to hold one. My family has served in the military for generations and my Native ancestors have been fighting terrorism since 1492.
My ancestors can be traced back almost 12,000 years in the particular part of the world I live in, so I do apologize for having an opinion in relation to the 2ND.
 

Your post came off as you calling Alaska "chicken "......

Well, surely we can all see that I did not call Alaska chicken. How do you call something anything when you're asking a question? Anyway, water under the bridge as far as I'm concerned. Apparently there is an Ontario in California or Florida LOL.
 

Please take the time to read thorough this thread from start to finish and maybe you'll see what I'm getting at. I'll have you know that I am a dual citizen and am not against the 2ND. I just feel that the boys that drafted up the Constitution didn't have the advanced weaponry of today in mind when they did so. You know? The good old black powder dueling pistol days? Just for the record I do own firearms and have been shooting guns since I was strong enough to hold one. My family has served in the military for generations and my Native ancestors have been fighting terrorism since 1492.
My ancestors can be traced back almost 12,000 years in the particular part of the world I live in, so I do apologize for having an opinion in relation to the 2ND.

So lets get the record straight, what EXACTLY do you think. Should the second stand as written or be minimized like the rest of our rights? The second was put there to protect us from a tyrannical govt, like what ours is becoming. There was no stipulation put in there limiting citizens to black powder.
..
 

When 2nd was written it was talking about the top of the line assault weapon of the day. 2nd does not say except for, limited to, or excluding anything. Our fore fathers left enough writings to make it clear they wanted the people to be able to defend their selves in the event of tyranny any time in the future.
 

Last edited:
Both please stop the attacks...
 

I'm all set on the vacation in Canada.....Key West or Jamaca I'm ready to go. I prefer warmth. But Chicken Alaska does sound interesting (in the summer).
There MUST be fear by the govt of the people. Seeing as you only put forth a repeated statement and a suggestion of vacationing in Canada instead of a REAL argument I will consider this an admission of defeat....

Diesel, you see backbacon and I both read your little ditty the same way. It is proper to put a coma between a city, and a state. Otherwise, you do get a different meaning :tongue3:
 

Diesel, you see backbacon and I both read your little ditty the same way. It is proper to put a coma between a city, and a state. Otherwise, you do get a different meaning :tongue3:

You have a point, I will admit I probably skipped that or it didn't take as I think I posted that off my smart phone. If this is the source of this confusion I will apologize. But I will not budge on the second amendment.....
 

Diesel, you see backbacon and I both read your little ditty the same way. It is proper to put a coma between a city, and a state. Otherwise, you do get a different meaning :tongue3:

punctuation makes all the difference in the world!
 

Well, at least we can agree on that pesky punctuation thing :laughing7: I just so happened to read it the same way backbacon did, that is why I made the invasion remark. :tongue3:

P.S. Diesel, not such a smartphone after all, huh :laughing7:
 

diesel,

We're going to have to send you for grammar classes....just kidding....lol.
 

You have a point, I will admit I probably skipped that or it didn't take as I think I posted that off my smart phone. If this is the source of this confusion I will apologize. But I will not budge on the second amendment.....

Diesel,I'm mighty partial to Mopar,even though I own a Chevy 4x4,Mopar made Quite a few muscle cars in my younger years,always loved em.Any how,Don't let this go to your head,but,it takes a good man to admit his mistakes when pointed out,being humble is a Very Blessed thing,didn't say you couldn't be strong in your convictions though!
 

Diesel,I'm mighty partial to Mopar,even though I own a Chevy 4x4,Mopar made Quite a few muscle cars in my younger years,always loved em.Any how,Don't let this go to your head,but,it takes a good man to admit his mistakes when pointed out,being humble is a Very Blessed thing,didn't say you couldn't be strong in your convictions though!

Amen to that! Thanks worldtalker! I tend to buy mopars as well. My old Dodge has about 402000 miles on it and still going strong! In 2010 I bought a brand new Wrangler, but that stays in the garage all winter. I don't want the salt on it....still only has about 16000 miles on it. I hope to keep it for a long time.
 

Amen to that! Thanks worldtalker! I tend to buy mopars as well. My old Dodge has about 402000 miles on it and still going strong! In 2010 I bought a brand new Wrangler, but that stays in the garage all winter. I don't want the salt on it....still only has about 16000 miles on it. I hope to keep it for a long time.

Lordy,almost half a million miles,just goes to show you the oil is the life blood of that mechanism,CHANGE it regular intervals as I know you do,but as anything mechanical,it's going to break down,my Wife gets on me when I see a problem arising in my truck and spend money to fix it,I tell Her,you either spend money now,or,you WILL spend MONEY later,pretty funny how Women think,God Bless them! I had an old timer tell me to spray brake fluid on the under carriage to slow rust,never tried it.
 

Lordy,almost half a million miles,just goes to show you the oil is the life blood of that mechanism,CHANGE it regular intervals as I know you do,but as anything mechanical,it's going to break down,my Wife gets on me when I see a problem arising in my truck and spend money to fix it,I tell Her,you either spend money now,or,you WILL spend MONEY later,pretty funny how Women think,God Bless them! I had an old timer tell me to spray brake fluid on the under carriage to slow rust,never tried it.

As far as rust I use a oil "endura "best undercoating you can get! I think I will have that old truck forever, as it is best truck I have ever owned! Doesn't even use any oil and no blow by....
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom