BlasterJ
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 340
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Southern California
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
The part about rolling and flattening the Gold in that paper was very interesting. Since we don't have the ability to run huge amounts of ore through a heap-leach process, this seems like a "high return on investment" for a small operator.A stamp mill is a single purpose piece of equipment while the ball mill may also be loaded with rods making it a multi purpose unit.
If you had read the document I had posted "Clarkson Rod Mill" we wouldn't be having this discussion.
1. The stamp mill is preferred when the ore has a decent concentration of gold with some visible gold.
2. A rod mill is used when the precious metals in the ore is very high with some visible gold, the rods flatten the gold which makes recovery quick and easy this gives the mine operator an instant cash flow. After the flattened gold has been removed the ore then goes into the ball mill for a final fine grind.
3. A ball mill is used when the precious metals encapsulated within a low grade ore. The balls grind the ore to a very fine powder liberating the precious metals. Which are then subjected to a cyanide leach with activated carbon to capture the gold. Google it CIP ( carbon in pulp ).
.
I saw another interesting homemade crusher a while back. It was more or less an arrastra, but built with stacks of cast Iron weight-lifting plates on a rod that spun around. The unit was 2-3' in diameter, semi-crushed ore was poured onto the grinding surface and a fine wet slurry came out the bottom.
I would imagine that the metal-on-metal rolling action would also flatten Gold particles.