Re: About the San Roque 1605's Tierra Firme armada.
Hello Claudio:
Yes, that is the chart as I recall it. From memory, I believe a 'tree' is mentioned somewhere on that chart. When I was there, I noted the 'port' was on the west side, not the north side, as noted. The current port was nothing more than a concrete wall, and the detachment of soldiers stationed on the island had no boat, only a radio,bare lighted rooms, hammocks and rotting floor boards. The port location on the chart could have been used in earlier times, but it wasn't the location of the current port.
The H. soldiers stationed there could only look over barbed wire and see the gringos hitting golf balls, participating in 'hay rides' and enjoying themselves, while the soldiers had nothing.
Thanks for sharing your research with this site (Swan and treasurenet), it's refreshing to read your thorough documentation.
Don....
I,too, had spoken to Bob before making the trip and he gave me some hints as to where to look. Unfortunately, the areas mentioned had been buried by a collapsed ceiling; and these areas were on the south side of Little Swan. The only mineral we encoutered was similar to calcite; a 3/4 inch layer at about 20 foot depth--on land.
There is wreckage visible on the east side of Big Swan, but that wreckage is 'modern', though coral encrusted. We accessed Little Swan from the north, swimming through a four foot gap in the coral; a tricky task with the action of the current and waves. (The gap was not perpendicular to the shore or the current.)
The 'river' that runs between the islands is subject to a good current--and shallow. We transited the 'river' with caution.