Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frankn said:What happened to Fisher? Were they bought out? They use to make top of the line detectors.
Sandman said:Frankn said:What happened to Fisher? Were they bought out? They use to make top of the line detectors.
They were not bought out, but sold to First Texas. They used to make top of the line detectors and had a lifetime warranty. Now it seems the materials went to the lowest bidder and some guys get lucky with service. I must have about six of them.
I have been detecting since the early 1960s and I don't consider myself an inexperienced hunter. I have had to send my F75 back for repair three(3) times in two years. The have replaced the coil two times and update the battery conns. also change the battery door. I think the "dead fish" looking coil needs to be redesigned too. It has a lot of drag when trying to use it in shallow water and it gets hung up on stubble.John Tanner said:Like what? I bought one and love it.
I see many inexperienced users encountering a case of operator failure on high performance units like Teknetics offers because they are used to slow, less sensitive inferior products that have been and are still offfered by other manufactureres.......inexperience users also think if a detector is light and well balance as opposed to an outdated, heavy and awkwardly balanced detector- it is 'cheap'-----WRONG!
The Omega is one of the best units ever made and I would love to have anyone pitch me a more competant detector even at hundreds of dollars more. (for my style of hunting and most other hunting styles) In the Omega I saw little if any issues while following forums so it is a bad choice to try and discredit -other FTP products I did see problems on. Can you give any specifics on Omega issues I may have missed?
I see many associated with brand loyaty talking bad but no specifics just-blah blah blah........-----they cant back it up with any facts especailly first hand facts.
There is a reason Garrett and the AT are trying to ride the coattails of First Texas-its because FTP are the leaders and the Garrett AT is proof of it--its a blatent copycat of the Tek units and features -give credit where credit is due-FTP is the undisputed leader....Whites is second because they at least show some of thier own inovation- Garrett is 3rd becasue at least they are trying to compete through imitation even if it is imitating FTP products---Garretts electronics engineering crew basically proved capable of reverse engineering Teknetics and they appear to have done a good job of mechanical engineering (waterproof)
HEEEELLLLOOOOOOO!
JT
I am not trying to discredit any detector......What they talked about in the other forum and sent there Omega's in for repairs was.... Not going into ground grab...screen blanking out... and just shuting off by it's self..John Tanner said:Like what? I bought one and love it.
I see many inexperienced users encountering a case of operator failure on high performance units like Teknetics offers because they are used to slow, less sensitive inferior products that have been and are still offfered by other manufactureres.......inexperience users also think if a detector is light and well balance as opposed to an outdated, heavy and awkwardly balanced detector- it is 'cheap'-----WRONG!
The Omega is one of the best units ever made and I would love to have anyone pitch me a more competant detector even at hundreds of dollars more. (for my style of hunting and most other hunting styles) In the Omega I saw little if any issues while following forums so it is a bad choice to try and discredit -other FTP products I did see problems on. Can you give any specifics on Omega issues I may have missed?
I see many associated with brand loyaty talking bad but no specifics just-blah blah blah........-----they cant back it up with any facts especailly first hand facts.
There is a reason Garrett and the AT are trying to ride the coattails of First Texas-its because FTP are the leaders and the Garrett AT is proof of it--its a blatent copycat of the Tek units and features -give credit where credit is due-FTP is the undisputed leader....Whites is second because they at least show some of thier own inovation- Garrett is 3rd becasue at least they are trying to compete through imitation even if it is imitating FTP products---Garretts electronics engineering crew basically proved capable of reverse engineering Teknetics and they appear to have done a good job of mechanical engineering (waterproof)
HEEEELLLLOOOOOOO!
JT
What i just put i the minelab forum under explorer or etrak is that Minelab has not put out a new detector in years but no one there will believe that even though it is the truth......John Tanner said:Like what? I bought one and love it.
I see many inexperienced users encountering a case of operator failure on high performance units like Teknetics offers because they are used to slow, less sensitive inferior products that have been and are still offfered by other manufactureres.......inexperience users also think if a detector is light and well balance as opposed to an outdated, heavy and awkwardly balanced detector- it is 'cheap'-----WRONG!
The Omega is one of the best units ever made and I would love to have anyone pitch me a more competant detector even at hundreds of dollars more. (for my style of hunting and most other hunting styles) In the Omega I saw little if any issues while following forums so it is a bad choice to try and discredit -other FTP products I did see problems on. Can you give any specifics on Omega issues I may have missed?
I see many associated with brand loyaty talking bad but no specifics just-blah blah blah........-----they cant back it up with any facts especailly first hand facts.
There is a reason Garrett and the AT are trying to ride the coattails of First Texas-its because FTP are the leaders and the Garrett AT is proof of it--its a blatent copycat of the Tek units and features -give credit where credit is due-FTP is the undisputed leader....Whites is second because they at least show some of thier own inovation- Garrett is 3rd becasue at least they are trying to compete through imitation even if it is imitating FTP products---Garretts electronics engineering crew basically proved capable of reverse engineering Teknetics and they appear to have done a good job of mechanical engineering (waterproof)
HEEEELLLLOOOOOOO!
JT
John Tanner said:I dont see it-lightweight and ergonomic does not equal cheap.
What units or parts are you refering to seeming cheap?
Rods are rods and they are all the same-hardware and screws? molded armcups? They use cam locks on the rods when others dont-coils? Coil cords? Connectors are the same industry wide-please more specifics on what specifically seems cheap[.......
I think you are confusing lightweight for cheap---light does not mean not durable?
JT