2008 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( Japanese) TREASURE

[mark14]

hello guys.....

we stop digging,,,because of lots of water...we use 2 water pump then 1 subersable pump...but still the water dont dry...sa water level stay until our stoac...we will resume it on april....

guys only 1 question...pls answer it...

how many meters away from te target? beacuse its all sand that were digging...

thanks...

pls text me at 09267304796

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Minelab PRO-FIND 35 Waterproof Pinpointer Metal Detector for Experts with Tone ID & Adjustable Sensitivity - Grab it through Amazon!

[boylara]

visit me at www.tseatc.com

 

[Zobex]

Re: 2005 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( [url=http://forum.treasurenet.com/words]--de

BTW,

The History Channel program was for the most part accurate up to the point that you see Major General John Signlaub at the Malinta tunnel. After that is all CIA propaganda. The investigator that talks about the CIA Director needed money and said what they wanted her to say, etc. Bob worked with Singlaub on a few projects.

Wayne

At the risk of being monitored I registered on this site to say that I appreciate information being conveyed by those who are in the know like WaynePhillips, ZOBEX, ANGEL_09, and SWR. I have a question, what should the approximate size of a 6.2 Kg bar of gold be? (i.e. Does let's say 8 inches long by 4 inches wide by 2 inches thick make sense?

Use this calculation :::

1 cubic inch of pure gold weighs 316.598 grams; 10.17886 troy oz; or 11.16767 imperial ounces.

The above answer is rounded to the nearest milligram or to the 5th decimal position on both imperial and troy ounces.

These numbers are detailed approximations based upon the following information and formula:

There are 19.32 grams of gold per cubic centimeter (assuming 99.9+% pure gold)
One cubic inch = 16.387064 cubic centimeters
One gram =
0.0321507466 troy ounce or
0.0352739619 ounces


General Singlaub and Col. Whittle make no bones over hauling out the gold, I was talking to him last month about things in the Islands and current USG extractions from the Philippines. How do you think Master Obama is paying for covert USG global operations with our economy.

Zobex

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI Zobie long time'

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Zobex]

Re: 2005 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( [url=http://forum.treasurenet.com/words]--de

BTW,

The History Channel program was for the most part accurate up to the point that you see Major General John Signlaub at the Malinta tunnel. After that is all CIA propaganda. The investigator that talks about the CIA Director needed money and said what they wanted her to say, etc. Bob worked with Singlaub on a few projects.

Wayne

At the risk of being monitored I registered on this site to say that I appreciate information being conveyed by those who are in the know like WaynePhillips, ZOBEX, ANGEL_09, and SWR. I have a question, what should the approximate size of a 6.2 Kg bar of gold be? (i.e. Does let's say 8 inches long by 4 inches wide by 2 inches thick make sense?

What you should do is look here. Do the research, learn, we all learn from each other.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/

http://www.onlineconversion.com/weight_all.htm

6.2 kilogram = 199.334 628 73 troy ounce

http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/125Adensitygold.html

This a picture of a bunch of 6.2's . Burmas. 87% pure.

 

[angel_09]

Re: 2005 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( [url=http://forum.treasurenet.com/words]--de

BTW,

The History Channel program was for the most part accurate up to the point that you see Major General John Signlaub at the Malinta tunnel. After that is all CIA propaganda. The investigator that talks about the CIA Director needed money and said what they wanted her to say, etc. Bob worked with Singlaub on a few projects.

Wayne

At the risk of being monitored I registered on this site to say that I appreciate information being conveyed by those who are in the know like WaynePhillips, ZOBEX, ANGEL_09, and SWR. I have a question, what should the approximate size of a 6.2 Kg bar of gold be? (i.e. Does let's say 8 inches long by 4 inches wide by 2 inches thick make sense?

Gues who,

When you are asking about the size, you are asking about the physical magnitude of something, and the dimensions you had given is the alledged physical measurement of the gold bar. If the density of the object will not be considered, then the physical size you had given is correct...but if we are speaking about gold, any size will not be suffice to determine its authenticity. The sizes, volume and density must all agree to prove that it is authentic. It means that these three values must be true to each other to give the basic properties of gold....Hence, a 1cm x 1cm x 1 cm measurement, will give you a volume of 1 cubic centimeter having a weight of 19.32 grams. This is the basis of gold calculation.

(You can use this "seed" information to determine if your gold is authentic or not.)

Angel_09

 

[Zobex]

Re: 2005 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( [url=http://forum.treasurenet.com/words]--de

The fast field way of testing is to pick up the bar, hold one end and swing down real hard, bang the other end of the bar on a hard rock, railroad track or steel beam. If it bends, you have some gold. If it just rings and stings your hand then drop it on the foot of the guy trying to pass it off as real and give him a sore foot.

Zobex

At the risk of being monitored I registered on this site to say that I appreciate information being conveyed by those who are in the know like WaynePhillips, ZOBEX, ANGEL_09, and SWR. I have a question, what should the approximate size of a 6.2 Kg bar of gold be? (i.e. Does let's say 8 inches long by 4 inches wide by 2 inches thick make sense?

Gues who,

When you are asking about the size, you are asking about the physical magnitude of something, and the dimensions you had given is the alledged physical measurement of the gold bar. If the density of the object will not be considered, then the physical size you had given is correct...but if we are speaking about gold, any size will not be suffice to determine its authenticity. The sizes, volume and density must all agree to prove that it is authentic. It means that these three values must be true to each other to give the basic properties of gold....Hence, a 1cm x 1cm x 1 cm measurement, will give you a volume of 1 cubic centimeter having a weight of 19.32 grams. This is the basis of gold calculation.

(You can use this "seed" information to determine if your gold is authentic or not.)

Angel_09
[/quote]

Angel_09 and Zobex ~ Thank you both so much for your responses. I think the best way to determine authenticity is to cut the item in half and test it, and then take it to a refinery/assayer and have the item fire assayed. I'm just trying to determine if the dimensions above might make sense with respect to the weight before doing the aforementioned. This way I should at least have an idea if I am dealing with AU (Or tungsten) Thanks Again ~
[/quote]

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HIO Much as I hate to say it, I tend to agree with swr, they are alloy bars, gold never develops a patina such as that. Although I once lost a nice treasure by believing Dore bars were simply brass. In this case the 99.999 eliminates that, since they are represented as pure Gold bars..

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[angel_09]

Gues Who,

If the dimensions and weight you gave previously refers to the recently posted bars, then SWR, Zobex and Realde are correct: Either it is brass or alloy. And I admire the type of lettering used nowadays, they are evolving, from rough and rugged to nice and smooth.

Do one thing, immerse your gold bar into graduated container with water and find the volume in inches and multiply by 316 and it will give you the weight; or if it is in cubic centimeter, multiply it with 19.3 and it will also give you the weight, then put your 'gold' into weighing scale and see if the weight is equal or approximately near to your calculated values (If it is 99.999 pure).

Now, if the dimensions and weight you're asking before does not represents the picture, then you can try a "destructive test" by re-melting your bar completely to determine if it is an alloy, tungsten or true gold and do the first procedure.


Angel_09

 

[GUESS-WHO]

Gues Who,

If the dimensions and weight you gave previously refers to the recently posted bars, then SWR, Zobex and Realde are correct: Either it is brass or alloy. And I admire the type of lettering used nowadays, they are evolving, from rough and rugged to nice and smooth.

Do one thing, immerse your gold bar into graduated container with water and find the volume in inches and multiply by 316 and it will give you the weight; or if it is in cubic centimeter, multiply it with 19.3 and it will also give you the weight, then put your 'gold' into weighing scale and see if the weight is equal or approximately near to your calculated values (If it is 99.999 pure).

Now, if the dimensions and weight you're asking before does not represents the picture, then you can try a "destructive test" by re-melting your bar completely to determine if it is an alloy, tungsten or true gold and do the first procedure.


Angel_09



Thank you Angel_09, SWR, Zobex, and Realde. Actually the bars I was questioning with respect to weight and dimensions are not these. They are these much less authentic looking ones.

 

[GUESS-WHO]

Thank you Angel_09, SWR, Zobex, and Realde. Actually the bars I was questioning with respect to weight and dimensions are not the ones posted above, but tthese much less authentic looking ones.

 

[GUESS-WHO]

Zobex ~ GBoy sent me the same picture of a bunch of 6.2's . Burmas. 87% pure.

 

[Zobex]

Zobex ~ GBoy sent me the same picture of a bunch of 6.2's . Burmas. 87% pure.

Who did you think gave it to him - - - - - - .

 

[GUESS-WHO]

Oh I thought he said it was one of his 100+ sites.

 

[GUESS-WHO]

SWR ~ Where did you get this information from? (World War ll period gold bars only used three fine digits (ie: 99.5) The 999.9 marks came about sometime in the 1990s)

 

[emperor]

hi zobex,
its been a long time since you posted, been looking forward to hear from you again, i hope your doing fine, because from your very wide actual experience and knowledge about this topic
there are some questions i would like to ask from you,

do you think the japanese warloots buried here in the PI are all in maountanious areas?
is there a chance that it could be buried in flat land sites?
another thing i heard is the warloots are buried very deep. how deep as the case maybe?
do you have a new email add? i've been emailing you quite a lot with your old email but with no response.

i hope all is well over there.
take care!

 

[kaloy]

zobex, other pros:
the pic is taken from a portion of a map, the site is an old house...
dont know if there was a wall clock in the house, or does it mean something else?
thanks....

 

[GUESS-WHO]

On Golden Lily maps this is referred to as a fulcrum point. It can represent the time of day with respect to markers on the site, depth, compass bearings, distance, etc. Do you have the other portion(s) of this map? The kin sign for gold is out of place.

 

[GUESS-WHO]

Also, if there is a Japanese flag on another portion of this map, the direction that it is flying will tell you if you need to view the map in a mirror if the image is reversed.

 

[Zobex]

zobex, other pros:
the pic is taken from a portion of a map, the site is an old house...
dont know if there was a wall clock in the house, or does it mean something else?
thanks....

If a flag pole is with the flag flying to the right, it is face up, if the flag is flying to the left, reverse it. The pole is from the bottom up and flag to the right, that is a proper orientation. From what little there is shown, you have a down under room with an entrance, it is rigged to blow. Only my opinion.

I have an original linen map with three flag poles in front of the complex, no flags on any of the poles. But they put the names of the town on it !!!!! The complex is gone but we found the site. The map was cut out of a non-magnetic documents safe found inside of a vault, 60 feet under a city street. A boarding house of poor people lived on top of a fortune but could not buy a bowl of rice. Sad.

Zobex