Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol...yes I know Jeff...I stopped today and showed him the buckle....Close.....JEFF
Very sandy soil here in the part of Florida he dug it. It is kind to brass artifacts, but generally more patination on the surface.An awesome find. Must have been in a bone-dry area to have none of the usual patina on the buckle or hardware.
I second that.I would like to see the backside of the buckle though.
It would be great to see the back, wonder if it will happen?I would like to see the backside of the buckle though.
Great research there Mr . "TheCannonballGuy".StroageUnit1 said:
> Also found these close by [the Double-Lion's-Head buckle].
Several European countries have continued to use that specific form of Double-Lion's-Head buckle into the 20th-Century. (For example, the photo I've attached below shows a Soviet Navy dagger-belt from World War 2.) The four brass finds in your newest photo, which you say you "found these all around the buckle," are the strap-buckle and three strap-adjusters from a World War One gasmask bag strap -- as seen in the other two photos I've attached.
Note that like your lion's-head buckle, they also have almost no "excavated brass" patina on the brass.
In my opinion, combining all this evidence (no patina, double-lions-head buckles were made and issued to 20th-Century Military units, you found WW1-buckles very close by your buckle) pretty much kills the possibility that your lion's-head buckle is from the 1700s.
Please believe me, I take no pleasure in sticking a pin into this balloon. But, facts are facts.