X-Y and Discrimination and Zincolns, Oh My!

Dave Rishar

Silver Member
Mar 6, 2008
3,212
3,256
WA
Detector(s) used
Tesoro Vaquero, XP Deus, Vallon Gizmo
A situation that I found interesting came up on Saturday. Before I present the problem, let me establish the scenario.

My detecting buddy/girlfriend was using a 9" Deus, running Andy S's trashy park program in 12 kHz. I was using a 11" Deus with the following settings: 4kHz, disc = 1, rx = 2, silencer = -1, with notches from 1-35 and 95-00. Both of us use V3.2 and the backphones. The site in question was a moderately trashy field behind a school dating back to the thirties. The soil wasn't bad, a welcome rarity around here, and we were both running sensitivity at 90 and getting away with it for once. EMI was low for an urban area. My GB was on manual and was at 86 in an 85 area, and I believe that hers was set to tracking.

On our way back to the car, she hit a signal that she liked and began evaluating it. (She tends to spend much more time evaluating targets than I do.) After re-checking at 90 degrees, she pulled out the Lesche and got ready to cut. I asked if I could step in and take a gander at what she had. She agreed. It was reading a slightly bouncy but repeatable 60 for me, and the tone sounded iffy...I don't know a better way to explain it, but most of you probably know what I'm talking about - it was almost but not quite a dig me, with a bit of a scratch or crackle to it. The X-Y showed a "rubber band" instead of a straight line, which for me means that it might be something good, but might be a bottlecap or pull tab. Her X-Y trace showed a line and obviously she liked the tone.

"What do you think?" she asked.

"I'm not sure that I'd dig it," I said. "It could be trash, but I suppose that it could be a zincoln affected by ferrous. It's shallow, so go ahead and dig it. Let's see."

She dug it. It was in fact a zincoln about 4-5" down, directly adjacent to that patch of red grunge one sees when a ferrous object has dissolved into the soil. I was quite pleased that I'd suspected this, but at the same time I was not pleased that she got a good tone/trace and I did not. The big question is, why did this happen? I thought about it quite a bit and we came up with a few theories on this.

1. My larger coil simply picked up more of the ground and got a more distorted signal. I don't personally think that this happened, but it's possible. Or...

2. 12kHz vs. 4kHz. I don't think that the frequency mattered here. If anything, I should have hit it harder and clearer than she did. Or, the one that I'm leaning toward...

3. The disc setting. This one's tricky because I've not yet seen a clear and definitive explanation for how exactly the discriminator works on the Deus, but I'm given to understand that the difference between disc and notch is that the former causes the machine to simply reject the unwanted signals before processing, while the latter processes the signal and then decides not to let you know about it. If this is the case, I can see why we had a different experience on this target - her machine rejected the iron, while mine simply kept it a secret from me. However, her machine successfully discriminated out that rust patch, but mine didn't - I heard a bit of it (that light scratch), and the X-Y saw some of it, making the trace more squiggly and oval-shaped. Is this what happened here?

The possibility of missing a zincoln doesn't bother me by itself, but I'd hate to think that I'm missing other things that I want to find. Air testing didn't show any significant depth difference between disc = 1 or disc = 10, and I'd already been wondering if there was perhaps a reason for why most of the factory programs have the disc up that high. Truthfully, I'd only kept it at 1 on the new program because that's what I'd already been using and it seemed to work, but now I'm beginning to think that turning it up a bit higher would be a good idea.

Thoughts?
 

1. Yes larger coils "see" more of the ground making it harder to seperate signals in trash but you get better depth. Its a trade off.

2. Were all the others settings exact? If not you cant really compare.

3. I find a setting of 8 on descrim is perfect for most all conditions. Knocks out iron bleed over and seems to run a bit more stable in my area and settings.

Hope that helps some!
 

Thanks for the advice, Bart. The point about the bigger coil makes a lot of sense.

The other settings were more than likely not exactly the same...and that's really the headache with the Deus, isn't it? It's so darned customizable, and there are so many settings that indirectly (or even directly) influence other settings when changed, that it can be hard to tell what exactly is going on. Andy's book was helpful, but I'm not sure that he was 100% correct on everything, and it's obvious that his particular method of hunting isn't exactly the same as mine. It would be nice if XP published something more detailed than the owner's manual explaining precisely how everything worked and interrelated to everything else. I've made guesses with my own testing but I'd prefer to hear it from the engineers who designed the thing.

I like your idea about disc. I was planning on only going up to 6 or so, but you've got several orders of magnitude more time on this machine than I do. I'll give 8 a shot. Thanks for the tip!
 

As a noob myself, I've got no advice for you on this topic, but I do thank you for your detailed posts--extremely helpful to me! To top it off, you have yours and your girlfriend's Deus to compare in field testing...priceless, and is sure to cut your learning curve considerably!

My first two outings with the Deus produced silver at 5 inches. The first day was awesome...2 separate digs of silver with accompanying caps/nails in the hole. The second day was in a high trash area previous hunters missed. Day 3 was today and I walked all over the place listening and listening and listening but found no silver. The best I could do was a wheaty at 5 inches.

Like you, I find myself using the XY screen frequently...I like the trace and TDI combo better than the TDI/horseshoe combo. I've already learned to give the trace lines a little leeway...

Thanks for your posts Dave; really helpful!
 

Last edited:
I was not pleased that she got a good tone/trace and I did not. The big question is, why did this happen? I thought about it quite a bit and we came up with a few theories on this.

1. My larger coil simply picked up more of the ground and got a more distorted signal. I don't personally think that this happened, but it's possible. Or...
Thoughts?

Simply find a target in the field to test. Keep the same setting between you and your girlfriend--but one of you use the 11" coil. Check trace. Then switch coils and check trace again for comparison.
 

We're using similar machines, but I've noticed that we use very different search protocols. She's very analytical and will spend a good amount of time evaluating a target, whereas I've generally made my decision about whether or not to dig in the first five seconds. She doesn't like digging holes; I don't mind. At the end of the day, I generally have more trash than she does, but I'll have more keepers as well. We're about tied with costume jewelry but I'm the only one with gold, as she won't dig the mid conductors like I do. Our settings are also obviously different, with her discriminating and notching more than I do. She has more time on her machine, but I believe that I've analyzed and retrieved many more targets...like I said, I don't mind digging holes. She wants an absolutely silent search, while I don't mind chatter as long as it's not drowning out good tones. (The latter is likely a result of having come up on an E-Trac; a silent hunt with an E-Trac around here requires auto -3 and even that's sometimes not enough.)

A side-by-side check with identical settings would probably be informative. We may try this.

I'm glad that I can help, but please double check my answers with guys who have more experience on the machine. I jumped in with both feet and dug up what seems like half of West Bremerton, but I haven't even been using the Deus for two months yet...maybe 60 or 70 hours? I'm still very much the apprentice and I'm still making mistakes, so take my responses with a healthy grain of salt. I've only just gotten to the point where I'm calling out targets before I dig, so I have a long, long way to go before I'm truly competent with this thing.
 

Very informative thread I've also started bringing my disc up more in some areas after reading this ill prob go higher
 

I prefer disk about 8 for the deep programs where I use on clean ground looking for deep silver. But usually around 10 for most use.
The deus needs some disk in order for Ferrous/ non ferrous graph to work 100%
I really prefer disk 10 as it runs alittle more stable and has fewer "ghost" signals and that can get you through hunt with less wasted time digging.... Well... Nothing.

If I get a faint Ghostly signal at disk 10 that means something.
Ghostly signal with <6-8 disk could just be a Ghost, I hate digging up Ghosts!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

I had the opportunity to hunt some old homesteads today. I didn't bother to make a program for this the night before because, frankly, making a program for the Deus can (and probably should) be done in the field and takes less than a minute. As we weren't expecting modern trash and I was personally planning on digging most repeatable signals, I simply made a few modifications to the stock relic program. I mention this because I'm not sure what the disc setting for that is, but it's higher than what I normally use.

To be honest, I didn't have much luck today; all of my fun finds were deep iron. That having been said, every single one of my ferrous targets gave itself away as being ferrous, even the ones that were wrapping around. The iron buzz might only be occasional, but it would present itself on at least one out of every three or four swings. I dug plenty of iron today, but none of it was accidental. One case does not prove a theory, but I'm leaning harder toward Foot Hill's point of view.

I plan on raising the disc on my park/school/general use program, but how high remains to be seen. I can't help but think that raising it all the way to 10 made no discernible difference in air testing, and it is what most of the stock programs use...

I did get a few good signals on halos left over from nonexistant targets, but I suspect that these would have fooled me with the higher disc. The Propointer was chirping continuously until I spread the rusty dirt out enough to break the signal. It was incredible, but it gave me a beautiful example of a rust halo with which to instruct my hosts.
 

Double tap.
 

Last edited:
Dave, thanks for this. I've been wondering why my pinpointer chirps...after I dig iron...Halo!

In the short time I've used the Deus (25-30 hours), I've only hunted parks and yards and the deep iron has been more prevalent in the parks. The Deus really likes to fool me on the flat rusty stuff-- that goes for bottlecaps too. I tinkered with adjusting the disc between 2 and 10 in this one park I'm recalling, and the only difference seemed to be I was getting more noise in the headphones as more, smaller bits of iron entered the accepted range. 8-10 was plenty low enough disc for me in that park and I didn't lose much, if any depth. The next time I go to a park site with iron I'll tinker with disc and perhaps have more to report...I have a Long way to go on this learning curve, but as long as I keep finding keepers, I'm happy.
 

If I'm coinshooting (and it sounds like you are) I use 4-8 kHz only! 12 kHz has, 1. The TID #'s for trash, and coin Id's all bunched closely together!:BangHead: And 2. 4-8 kHz will hit coins, copper/silver much harder,than the higher frequency's. The next time your out,and find a coin about 6 inches deep,make a pass over it in 12 kHz,and listen to the signal/tone. Then switch to 4 kHz and make another pass over it,and listen to the difference in tone,and volume.Then 8 kHz. You will be suprized! Discrimination kills depth,10 is the absolute highest I will run,and most of the time 8 or lower is the normal setting while coinshooting,if conditions allow it.If you like a quiet machine,with no chatter, Notching is your friend,and cost you nothing in depth. If I'm coinshooting a open area (very little trash) I use a setting of 6 on discrimination,and notch out nothing( I want to hear it all)!:thumbsup: If I was looking for small objects (ear rings,ect.) 12 KHz or higher, would be the weapon of choice! As far a Zincolns go,I have my Deus set to notch out all of them. In our area they look like they have been in battery acid,and are completely worthless. My Deus pays about as much attention to them as it dose to pigeon poop!:laughing7:
00217_zps55e4d97e.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
 

Last edited:
Some of my zincolns look like that too. I have one that's basically only a date; others have holes clear through them. It's crazy how fast those things rot.

Good stuff though. I'm fond of notching - perhaps too much at the top end, although I wasn't finding silver coins before I began notching up there (or even before I got a Deus) either, so I'm not too worried about that. I couldn't find a significant depth difference between disc 1 and disc 10, so I've compromised at around 6.8 or so. (Why 6.8? Because XP's "deep" program uses 6.8. Completely arbitrary.) I now notch out 30 and below in 8 kHz as a rule, as I can't think of anything down there that I'd want to dig. As a bonus, this effectively gets rid of the can slaw and drug addict foil balls, making park hunts around here much nicer.

I'm not sure that I'd want to notch out rotted zincolns though. Around here, that can go right down into the nickel range in 8 kHz, and that's where I've found all of my gold. I've thought about using an intermediate notch but I'm paranoid about missing jewelry.
 

Zincs and fertilizer dont mesh well.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top