Why No Outrage From Obama And Holder On This Childs Senseless Murder

I dont care how old they are,to say it in a nice way,some people just need to be put down

+1 If these animals are not put down or locked up with no possibility of parole, they are young enough to get out and murder again. Shoot a baby in the head? Can't even comprehend how someone could do that. Those young thugs are truly human trash.
 

+1 If these animals are not put down or locked up with no possibility of parole, they are young enough to get out and murder again. Shoot a baby in the head? Can't even comprehend how someone could do that. Those young thugs are truly human trash.

"If these animals are not put down or locked up with no possibility of parole." I assume your not talking about The Animals who made famous with "The House of the Rising Sun?"
"Some of those that join forces, are the same that burn crosses." --Rage Against the Machine

Animals....animals..wow.
 

I think if the liberals got out of the prison system and the nuckelheads that got out and told the younger ones you don't want to end up there. Instead of coming out and telling them no big deal 3 hots and a cot free tattoos t. v. all the coffee you want weight lifting equipment learn the law and tie up the system etc etc. If they came back with raw ankles from chain marks on them maybe a few would listen in school??/

By the way if GZ is a white Hispanic What the he!! is the President?
 

By the way if GZ is a white Hispanic What the he!! is the President?

You really want me to tell you.:laughing9:

I think if the liberals got out of the prison system and the nuckelheads that got out and told the younger ones you don't want to end up there. Instead of coming out and telling them no big deal 3 hots and a cot free tattoos t. v. all the coffee you want weight lifting equipment learn the law and tie up the system etc etc.

Dont forget the free schooling they get from career criminals.
 

TH, I see your point - I really do.

Unfortunately, you are focusing on the wrong aspect of comparisons about this case, the Zimmerman case, or even the Marley Lion case.

The reason the Zimmerman case is national news is because there was no clear answer (regardless of whatever your personal beliefs may be, this is an undeniable fact). Some people adamantly say he was guilty others say he was not guilty. Some say he was a victim, others say he was a murderer.

This case you posted is about horrendous street crime - as was the Marley Lion case. In both instances, the GENERAL PUBLIC can clearly see that "criminals shot an innocent victim" and should be punished thusly. In the Zimmerman case, this comparison cannot be made.

Sadly, street crime is so prevalent and so ingrained into our society that stories of no constroversy but merely street crime are not news worth enough to go beyond local news.
Your wrong, there was a clear answer and we got it from the trial and from the jury...the local police department had the clear answer from the beginning...this man should have never been on trial...that's not my opinion...that's the truth.
 

Your wrong, there was a clear answer and we got it from the trial and from the jury...the local police department had the clear answer from the beginning...this man should have never been on trial...that's not my opinion...that's the truth.

At the time there was not a clear answer. If you think there was a clear answer then you must think you are a judge and jury. What about the right to due process? What about the 5th Amendment? YOU are wrong.
 

At the time there was not a clear answer. If you think there was a clear answer then you must think you are a judge and jury. What about the right to due process? What about the 5th Amendment? YOU are wrong.

The police chief that was fired who has 30+ years of police experience and who is also black said there was no evidence to arrest Zimmerman with. You HAVE TO HAVE EVIDENCE that gives you probable cause to arrest someone.

When someone claims self defense you have to have EVIDENCE to refute their claim of self defense, eye witness, conflicting evidence, something, you can't just arrest them....

The jury proved the police chief was correct, and proved we were correct, it was self defense. He never should have been arrested, they never produced any evidence to refute self defense under the law.

It was purely political to push the gun agenda and deflect attention away from the numerous scandals adminstration is up to their neck in...

The IRS scandal among others is going to come roost on the White House door step..



Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Last edited:
At the time there was not a clear answer. If you think there was a clear answer then you must think you are a judge and jury. What about the right to due process? What about the 5th Amendment? YOU are wrong.
You have to have evidence to arrest someone...you don't just take people to court to figure it out, you have to have evidence and they had none...that's my clear answer.
 

I think ben is waiting for the guilty until proven innocent when the U.S. police state gets full blown,oh wait a minute you already are considered guilty until proven innocent.
 

hypocrisy is coming, and your on his list.
 

Its a pity what the sheep and the libs dont know,whoops theyre basically the same thing.As i was saying,when the SHTF and it will the way things are going right now.Its not a matter of IF but of WHEN,the sheep are first on the list.Say goodbye sheep:hello:
 

Jim,

JerseyBen made a well thought out post that was a legitmate answer to TH's question. You just threw a random insult out there and assumed it applies to JB. Furthermore, his post was addressed to TH and not you. I do not appreciate the way you treated my friend.

Crispin


What does this mean? What is the usefulness of this post Crispy?
 

Oh how the insults fly...

Edit: I am tired of being insulted, thus I bow out of this thread.
 

Last edited:
"Don't follow leaders and watch them parking meters"--Bob Dylan

Choking on the ashes of her enemies.....Kurt Cobain
 

Problem is, if Obama had a son he wouldn't look anything like this little victim, he would look like the thug Zimmerman shot.
 

Yes, "animals" is a fair description lacking a name for a lower life form. Non-human,............hmmmmmmm.....there must be something worse than animals because they are even lower than that.
They live exactly like animals feeding off the carrion from the streets they are spawned on.
Maggots sounds close.
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top