which 2 box for large deep meteorites?

Will any of them work or is it a waste of money/time.Fisher/whites/garrett?
I have not tried the Garrett. The Fisher/Hayes and Whites 2 box units work. The Fisher and Hays units need to be kept level or they chirp. All 3 of these need to be set up correctly. The Whites has a ground balance that helps in mineralised ground. The other 2 do not have a gb. Not sure if Garrett has a gb. I like them beacause you don't have to have the coils right on top of the ground but can still cover a lot of ground while passing over any scrub/brush and still pick up on decent size metal. I believe they are sensitive to meteorites in the chondrite classification as well if there is a decent amount of that material.Check for used ones online or at Clevengers in Kansas City.Hope this helps,Jon
 

I have not tried the Garrett. The Fisher/Hayes and Whites 2 box units work. The Fisher and Hays units need to be kept level or they chirp. All 3 of these need to be set up correctly. The Whites has a ground balance that helps in mineralised ground. The other 2 do not have a gb. Not sure if Garrett has a gb. I like them beacause you don't have to have the coils right on top of the ground but can still cover a lot of ground while passing over any scrub/brush and still pick up on decent size metal. I believe they are sensitive to meteorites in the chondrite classification as well if there is a decent amount of that material.Check for used ones online or at Clevengers in Kansas City.Hope this helps,Jon

Yes i have the new Garrett 2500 bloodhound it has gb ,i don't know if the old one had that are not, i can only say my garrett worked great.
 

Thanks for the replies
It seems the fisher gemini3 is the most difficult to use,it is liked or hated by those who own or have owned them.Me i use to be fisher all the way but am older and not brand loyal.All make good and not so good of machines.The gti 25000 is a very unique idea and on my radar.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top