every one says all the gold catches in the top couple feet of the sluice. yet when tony Beats didn't like the recovery of the gold dredge lengthened the sluices what from 40 to 55 feet. ? Ive been rebuilding my highbanker. changing the layout to make it more stable ( two 5 gallon buckits of gravels in the distruction chamber caused it to overturn last time it was used.} I measured it at 35 feet over all but I do not know if I will use all the flume ( sluice) sections, have bent a couple new ones, and have worked on making my own mats. have a testing area in the distruction chamber like doc from gold hog put in the monster. increased the distruction chamber from 2 to three feet. drilled the holes in my punch plate grizzley bigger.
still I have a half built tromel but is it any better than the distruction chamber?
have just about every mat design I can think of and some gold hog mats also. was thinking about putting in a section of flume with drop pockits with a sluice gate in the middle so the water goes down acrost and back up. read a paper from a newzealand beach miner saying this was the best design because of the fluid bed actiopn ie rising water carrys off the waste material leaving the gold behind. his design has 4 cm wall on the uphill side of the pockit 4 cm acrost the flat bottom and 3 cm on the down hill. is it worth it to add it?
my friend vince whos mined for 40 odd years says that more than 8 or 12 feet of sluice is a waste but have found gold all the way down to second to last sluice which is where I had my gold hog mats . last mat was home made 18 inch wide by 6 feet long with 8th inch wide saw cuts in conveyer belting and think it caught some gold too.
last question how deep do you like to run the water in your sluices?
thankyou and hoping for an early spring
still I have a half built tromel but is it any better than the distruction chamber?
have just about every mat design I can think of and some gold hog mats also. was thinking about putting in a section of flume with drop pockits with a sluice gate in the middle so the water goes down acrost and back up. read a paper from a newzealand beach miner saying this was the best design because of the fluid bed actiopn ie rising water carrys off the waste material leaving the gold behind. his design has 4 cm wall on the uphill side of the pockit 4 cm acrost the flat bottom and 3 cm on the down hill. is it worth it to add it?
my friend vince whos mined for 40 odd years says that more than 8 or 12 feet of sluice is a waste but have found gold all the way down to second to last sluice which is where I had my gold hog mats . last mat was home made 18 inch wide by 6 feet long with 8th inch wide saw cuts in conveyer belting and think it caught some gold too.
last question how deep do you like to run the water in your sluices?
thankyou and hoping for an early spring
Upvote
0