Hook111111
Jr. Member
- Oct 5, 2020
- 29
- 54
- Detector(s) used
- Garret atx
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have to disagree with those dismissing your ‘meteorite’. Your specimen has a very typical appearance for a Saharan desert-weathered chondrite. Only some additional testing would confirm it, but from your pictures I don’t see any obvious red flags.
There is a very large strewnfield which has been yielding meteorite fragments of this type in recent years and reaching the market as generic NWA material. The location is not being disclosed by the finders but is believed to be on the border of Algeria and the meteorites are appearing on the market in Morocco (generally claimed as having been found there).
Although it’s oft-repeated here on the forum that if it ain’t magnetic then it’s not a meteorite, that of course is not true. It only applies to the commonly found types. But if what you have is a meteorite then it doesn’t look like an achondrite (which might well have little or no attraction to a magnet).
The ‘L’ group of chondrites (within which the ‘L’ stands for low iron) typically have about 20-25% total iron with only about 4-10% as free metal. Those will nevertheless still show noticeable attraction to an ordinary magnet. The ‘LL’ group of chondrites (low iron and low metal) typically have about 19-22% total iron but with only about 1-3% free metal. Certainly, the specimens at the lower end may not show significant attraction to an ordinary magnet and only weak attraction to a rare-earth magnet.
LL chondrites are the least common class of ordinary chondrite, but not especially rare in the overall scheme of things. They also tend to be brecciated (attesting to a violent history in the solar system) such that fragments can have a quite variable composition from piece to piece. Some more magnetic than others.
Seems like the naysayer post has been deleted, although I don't know whether this was the action of one of the Moderators.
Although I frequently respond in the negative when people ask the question "is this a meteorite?" I try to say why... that is point out the contra-indicators if I can see them. That's not the case here and I remain supportive that this specimen has no red flags, has an appearance commonly seen in Saharan specimens, and has no magnetic properties inconsistent with a very low metal chondrite. That of course doesn't mean that it is a meteorite but certainly it's well worthy of next-level testing and my guess is that it will pass those tests.
Why all the dissing when someone posts what he thinks is a meteorite? Seems like a simple yes it is or no its not would suffice.I really don,t see why all the discouraging remarks.