Tom_in_CA
Gold Member
- Mar 23, 2007
- 13,804
- 10,336
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
Trying to catch up on all the discussion after a few days absence. I'd love to reply to each person who gave me food for thought (thanx). Un-discovered science, results debate, random chance vs successes, spiritual vs natural, etc... blah blah blah.
During my few days away, I had an "aha moment". I thought of something I wanted to add to the bomb dowsing thread. So I came to add, but it's gone Oh well, here's what I wanted to say:
As we all know, the military was dissatisfied with the results of their testing (wrote it off to random chance). But as we all know, a dowsing rod in the hands of someone inexperienced, will OF COURSE lead to poor results. They stick the thing in the hands of an inexperienced non-believer, and what do they expect? So here's where I'm going with this: Some of you have attested to results, that can be nothing other than bonafied successes of dowsing. Treasures for instance? Diamonds? etc.... You know that your results are better than random chance, hunches, etc.. Then, why doesn't a qualified dowser simply go the military, and SHOW them that it works? There are scores of dowsers in the USA. Surely one of them must be willing to set the record straight on these skewed test results? You know the old saying: "build a new mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door" You would be a millionaire overnight, if you could show it's possible to dowse for landmines.
Why doesn't someone respond the scandalous newspaper accounts of Sniffex? And if you say it's because Sniffex is a different form of dowsing, then why not show up on their doorstep with the correct form of dowsing, and make millions showing them it can be done? For example, md'ing clubs I've been in, are sometimes called out to help the police find a ditched murder weapon, spent crime scene bullets, etc.... Humorously, in some cases, they will tell us "yeah, we have a department metal detector, and we tried to search with it, but all we got was foil, some bailing wire, and it squaked everywhere!". We oblige, set up a search party, go out with our detectors, and find it! The cops are happy, as they thought that perhaps a bullet was simply too small to find, or the weapon certainly wasn't there, since THEY couldn't find it, or whatever. So in the same sense, can't someone help Uncle Sam know that dowsing can work to help the military?
Aside from that, I did some word searches on dowsing the other day, and came up with two hits, I'd like comment on, from the pro-dowsers.
The first one is from a secular viewpoint:
http://skepdic.com/dowsing.html
The next one is from a Christian theological viewpoint:
http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0099a.html
In each case, the "results" aren't debated, or, to the extent they are (attributing some to random chance, hunches, etc...), they also give stories of actual successes! But they attribute them to spiritual things, not natural or scientific (discovered or undiscovered) means.
During my few days away, I had an "aha moment". I thought of something I wanted to add to the bomb dowsing thread. So I came to add, but it's gone Oh well, here's what I wanted to say:
As we all know, the military was dissatisfied with the results of their testing (wrote it off to random chance). But as we all know, a dowsing rod in the hands of someone inexperienced, will OF COURSE lead to poor results. They stick the thing in the hands of an inexperienced non-believer, and what do they expect? So here's where I'm going with this: Some of you have attested to results, that can be nothing other than bonafied successes of dowsing. Treasures for instance? Diamonds? etc.... You know that your results are better than random chance, hunches, etc.. Then, why doesn't a qualified dowser simply go the military, and SHOW them that it works? There are scores of dowsers in the USA. Surely one of them must be willing to set the record straight on these skewed test results? You know the old saying: "build a new mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door" You would be a millionaire overnight, if you could show it's possible to dowse for landmines.
Why doesn't someone respond the scandalous newspaper accounts of Sniffex? And if you say it's because Sniffex is a different form of dowsing, then why not show up on their doorstep with the correct form of dowsing, and make millions showing them it can be done? For example, md'ing clubs I've been in, are sometimes called out to help the police find a ditched murder weapon, spent crime scene bullets, etc.... Humorously, in some cases, they will tell us "yeah, we have a department metal detector, and we tried to search with it, but all we got was foil, some bailing wire, and it squaked everywhere!". We oblige, set up a search party, go out with our detectors, and find it! The cops are happy, as they thought that perhaps a bullet was simply too small to find, or the weapon certainly wasn't there, since THEY couldn't find it, or whatever. So in the same sense, can't someone help Uncle Sam know that dowsing can work to help the military?
Aside from that, I did some word searches on dowsing the other day, and came up with two hits, I'd like comment on, from the pro-dowsers.
The first one is from a secular viewpoint:
http://skepdic.com/dowsing.html
The next one is from a Christian theological viewpoint:
http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0099a.html
In each case, the "results" aren't debated, or, to the extent they are (attributing some to random chance, hunches, etc...), they also give stories of actual successes! But they attribute them to spiritual things, not natural or scientific (discovered or undiscovered) means.