What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

[EE THr]

That was a rhetorical question, RDT, don't bother replying.

Instead, since the LRL promoters have totally ignored the original topic post, I will be kind enough to reiterate it here---

What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

They fear taking Carl's double-blind test.

They fear the Big Four Proofs of LRL Fraud and the Predictable Pattern of LRL Con Artists.

They fear agreeing upon a protocol for a fair and unbiased random double-blind test.

They fear committing to a statement of what their LRLs are: dowsers, dowsing enhancers, or all electronically operated devices.

They fear their LRL devices being analysed by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear the schematics of LRL devices being evaluated by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear anyone challenging their claims.

They fear Science.

They fear truth.



And they fear this---



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

There have been no denials of any of the above, except that one person (EddieR) did agree that Carl's test was fair.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

I know that your memory is pretty much shot, going by your past postings....but you have referred to me as a promoter in several past posts directed to me. So...what definition are you currently going by when you use the word "promoter"?

Alternatively...you seem to glump all opponents as skeptics. Several of us have posted we are not skeptical about these devices, and have supported our stance with reliable references, sources, photographic evidence and schematics.

You yourself appear to have memory issues. Maybe you should try cleaning your own house before whining about what other folks are doing

No. You are pseudo-skeptics. There is a big difference.

ER---

Unless you admit that you are a promoter, that list wouldn't apply to you.

So, you must admit that you are a promoter first, before I can show you anything. Because if you're not a promoter, then it's a moot point, right?

So are you or aren't you?

(If you're not sure what you are, I certainly can see why! Bwaahaahaahaahaahoooooooooooie!)



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Are you or aren't you, ER?

It seems that you can't make up your mind which team you belong on.

Uh-oh!







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Are you or aren't you, ER?
It seems that you can't make up your mind which team you belong on.
Uh-oh!

Could you please explain just what you are talking about ?

 

[EddieR]

Perhaps you will just humor me then? Show me where I quoted you when you stated the definition of "LRL promoter" as you are using it.

I appreciate your admitting that you are an LRL Promoter. Thank you!

Now why, exactly, would I need to quote you?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Once again for the challenged.....Post the quote or admit that you lied again. Failure to post the quote WILL be considered an admission that you lied about your claim.

You need to get a life, dude. Did you just get on here to post lies everywhere? You claim that I made a statement....but yet you can't produce the proof. You claim that you know about electronics, but you have shown zilch proving that. Oh yeah....you want us to trust you because you say so.


You are just proving you are full of fluff.........SHO NUFF.

 

[aarthrj3811]

So....did Eddie post a picture of the Long Range Locator he allegedly used to "find" the ring he dropped?
I'm still waiting for Eddie to validate his word that he is a LRL user....not saying that Eddie lied....for heavens sake.....just wanting Eddie to validate his claim.
Failure to post a picture of your LRL WILL be considered an admission that you lied about your claim

You can consider anything that you want to….Eddie has validated his claim to the treasure hunters..So now failure to post a picture is an admission of guilt ?..Still silly season in the skeptics Clan ?

 

[Rudy(CA)]

So....did Eddie post a picture of the Long Range Locator he allegedly used to "find" the ring he dropped?
I'm still waiting for Eddie to validate his word that he is a LRL user....not saying that Eddie lied....for heavens sake.....just wanting Eddie to validate his claim.
Failure to post a picture of your LRL WILL be considered an admission that you lied about your claim

You can consider anything that you want to….Eddie has validated his claim to the treasure hunters..So now failure to post a picture is an admission of guilt ?..Still silly season in the skeptics Cult ?

Af1733, You seem to allow your support for a Skeptic Cult Publicity Gimmick to get in the way of the facts, and common sense.

After Several Complaints about being called names,
like "Liar, Thief, Scammer etc."
I feel it is only fair things should be equil here.

I looked up the word "Cult".

cult Pronunciation Key (klt)
n.

A religion or religious sect generally considered to be extremist or false, with its followers often living in an unconventional manner under the guidance of an authoritarian, charismatic leader.
The followers of such a religion or sect.


And I do believe this may be offensive to some.

Dell, Please change Cult to Community or other word.

Due to the fact, I would get too backed up, I won't go through all past posts.
However

Any "future" use if the Word "Cult" in Posts describing Skeptics will
cause complete deletion of posts.

Thank you For your Cooperation on keeping TreasureNet a Cut Above the rest.
Jeff

You need to change your tune, Art.

And possibly the brand of Kool Aid you drink.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Art~

You can consider anything that you want to….Eddie has validated his claim to the treasure hunters..So now failure to post a picture is an admission of guilt ?..Still silly season in the skeptics Clan ?

~SWR~

You need to change your tune, Art.

~Rudy(CA)~

And possibly the brand of Kool Aid you drink.

Great replies…
Thank you validating Eddies claim..so you agree that it is silly season for you skeptics..Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

I don't see any replies to Eddies claim. Reading comprehension problems, again?

~ART~

You can consider anything that you want to….Eddie has validated his claim to the treasure hunters..So now failure to post a picture is an admission of guilt ?..Still silly season in the skeptics Clan ?

 

[EddieR]

Once again for the challenged.....Post the quote or admit that you lied again. Failure to post the quote WILL be considered an admission that you lied about your claim.

You need to get a life, dude. Did you just get on here to post lies everywhere? You claim that I made a statement....but yet you can't produce the proof. You claim that you know about electronics, but you have shown zilch proving that. Oh yeah....you want us to trust you because you say so.


You are just proving you are full of fluff.........SHO NUFF.

So....did Eddie post a picture of the Long Range Locator he allegedly used to "find" the ring he dropped?

I'm still waiting for Eddie to validate his word that he is a LRL user....not saying that Eddie lied....for heavens sake.....just wanting Eddie to validate his claim.

Failure to post a picture of your LRL WILL be considered an admission that you lied about your claim

I don't have a picture of it, sorry. I also don't have pics of any of my metal detectors, either. No, I didn't lie. But truthfully, I don't care if anyone believes me or not. It happened, and just because somebody says they don't believe it will not change that.

 

[fenixdigger]

Now Eddie, You mean you don't wear one of those hat cameras and film everything you do?? Oh, wait a minute, neither do I.

Good post, How many times have you answered stupid questions about that? 100? When you are here only to insult, argue, and the other cute little things with a poor memory, the answers just never get in there.

Carl's test is way too ruff---get some SHO-NUFF

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EddieR

I don't have a picture of it, sorry. I also don't have pics of any of my metal detectors, either. No, I didn't lie. But truthfully, I don't care if anyone believes me or not. It happened, and just because somebody says they don't believe it will not change that.

~SWR~

just how many people died for that "flat earth" theory

Hey Eddie..you are correct for not showing them anything. I made that mistake and gave them a chance to make 100’s of silly posts. Like you the only reason I am here is to provide information to Treasure hunters.
Hey SWR..I have new information for you..the Earth is round..People did not die when they sailed off the edge of the earth..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

Well that's pretty cool he can find the first one but not the ones with pictures and links. Hmmm

I think my first few posts pretty well summed it up. Hasn't changed in 500 posts. Not gonna change for the next 9,800 either.

I'm just not going to be that blunt with them, most of it they have no control over. I didn't realize that at first. Seems like I was making a statement of perception, not talking to someone direct, but I'm not gonna click and see.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

just how many people died for that "flat earth" theory :::chortles:::

~SWR~

Good deal. Tell your comrade fenix that...it's his claim, not mine
(I see your reading comprehension failed again)

Sorry SWR..I missed the :::chortles::: at the end…Since all your posts are in the form of a Joke it is hard to tell when there is a factual comments in them..Art

 

[EE THr]

Do any of the LRL promoters remember the Topic Title?

Apparently not, so here it is, again---

What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

They fear taking Carl's double-blind test.

They fear the Big Four Proofs of LRL Fraud and the Predictable Pattern of LRL Con Artists.

They fear agreeing upon a protocol for a fair and unbiased random double-blind test.

They fear committing to a statement of what their LRLs are: dowsers, dowsing enhancers, or all electronically operated devices.

They fear their LRL devices being analysed by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear the schematics of LRL devices being evaluated by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

They fear anyone challenging their claims.

They fear Science.

They fear truth.



And they fear this---



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

So far, only one person has responded intelligently, and that was EddieR, who said that Carl's test is, indeed, fair.

I'm still waiting for the others to wake up to what the Topic actually is....

 

[EE THr]

P.S. Again, let's see who tries to change the subject to insults first.

I predict it will be artie, but the fenix brothers are a close second, so it could be either....

 

[aarthrj3811]

What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

Please tell us what we fear the most..?

 

[EE THr]

What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

Please tell us what we fear the most..?

#22.




Prediction results so far: 1 correct!

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Art~

Please tell us what we fear the most..?

~EE~

#22.
Prediction results so far: 1 correct!

Name of thread.. What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?
22. If on a forum, to divert the topic or questions, the CA may also post nonsensical comments.

 

[aarthrj3811]

What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

They fear taking Carl's double-blind test.

Not fear..just smarter than the Skeptics and do not fall Fake Fraud Test.

They fear the Big Four Proofs of LRL Fraud and the Predictable Pattern of LRL Con Artists.

Just smart enough to ignore your personal opinions

They fear agreeing upon a protocol for a fair and unbiased random double-blind test.

Where can this protocol be found ?

They fear committing to a statement of what their LRLs are: dowsers, dowsing enhancers, or all electronically operated devices.

How can we agree on something that is false?

They fear their LRL devices being analyzed by electronics professionals at a college of their choice.

We do not need them to be analyzed…You do

They fear the schematics of LRL devices being evaluated by electronics professionals at a college of their choice

.
Same as above

They fear anyone challenging their claims.

We consider the challenges to be just another fraudulent claim

They fear Science

.
No we do not as we always strive to gain knowledge

They fear truth.

Prove it

 

[fenixdigger]

Dang Art, That was to the bone.

I want to add this. Who's out there constantly doing experiments? Who refuses to expend any effort on discovery?

Who demands That a "test" be taken? Who tries to help members that have already have a device understand how to use it?

Who understands that one device can be used in several different applications? Who asks convoluted questions that cannot be

answered without being seen to be contradictory?

See any difference? SHO-NUFF