pyrogort
Jr. Member
- Jan 19, 2012
- 73
- 90
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Vaquero, Minelab Sovereign (original),
Fisher 1280-X, Garrett Master Hunter BFO,
Aquapulse.
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
I'm saving to purchase a new Tesoro and am evaluating the characteristics of the 3 models
that interest me (Vaquero, Tejon, & Outlaw).
I have, of course, read most of the TNet postings regarding these units as well as popular
magazine "Reviews and Field tests" to try and determine which would be best for my
application. Really wish I could select design characteristics and features from all 3 and combine
them into one unit! Maybe this new Tesoro unit reportedly coming out this year will do just that.
Anyway, most data I've read from folks "in the know" regarding Tesoro machines agree the Tejon
has a depth advantage over the Vaquero. Why is this? Is it due to the operating frequency difference
or something else? Could it be power? How does the Vaquero get such reportedly great performance
out of a single 9 volt transistor battery that weighs about 46 grams whereas the Tejon (and many
others) employs eight 1.5 volt AA batteries that weigh about 189 grams in aggregate? I believe in
power....I understand power. Maybe the fact that the Vaquero battery is a "transistor" battery?
I'm no electronics buff and was hoping someone (Mr. Soloman, maybe?) could enlighten me.
Depth alone is not my primary goal but am just curious. Other factors such as weight, pinpoint
circuitry, dual disc. modes, etc. also come into play. This will be a land-only unit for me....parks,
schools, city fields & parkways, homesites, etc. No water or relic hunting....coins & jewelry only.
I've read where some consider the Tejon to be "too much machine" for that type of hunting being
more suited for relic use, but wouldn't it be better to have a more powerful unit you could turn
down rather than a less powerful unit you couldn't turn up?
Since I live in Central Florida, ground mineralization is just not an issue. Pulled many nice coins at
depths up to 6 inches back in the late 70's using a White's TR discriminator. Weight, operational
stability, and discrimination differentiation (or recovery speed as some call it) are more important
and all three of these machines would certainly "fit the bill". I'm in no hurry as I'm stockpiling the
cash to make a buy but would truly appreciate some input from experienced TNet members.
I also have a question regarding coil size selection for coin hunting but will save that for the
"General Discussion" forum.
Thanks guys (and gals!)
that interest me (Vaquero, Tejon, & Outlaw).
I have, of course, read most of the TNet postings regarding these units as well as popular
magazine "Reviews and Field tests" to try and determine which would be best for my
application. Really wish I could select design characteristics and features from all 3 and combine
them into one unit! Maybe this new Tesoro unit reportedly coming out this year will do just that.
Anyway, most data I've read from folks "in the know" regarding Tesoro machines agree the Tejon
has a depth advantage over the Vaquero. Why is this? Is it due to the operating frequency difference
or something else? Could it be power? How does the Vaquero get such reportedly great performance
out of a single 9 volt transistor battery that weighs about 46 grams whereas the Tejon (and many
others) employs eight 1.5 volt AA batteries that weigh about 189 grams in aggregate? I believe in
power....I understand power. Maybe the fact that the Vaquero battery is a "transistor" battery?
I'm no electronics buff and was hoping someone (Mr. Soloman, maybe?) could enlighten me.
Depth alone is not my primary goal but am just curious. Other factors such as weight, pinpoint
circuitry, dual disc. modes, etc. also come into play. This will be a land-only unit for me....parks,
schools, city fields & parkways, homesites, etc. No water or relic hunting....coins & jewelry only.
I've read where some consider the Tejon to be "too much machine" for that type of hunting being
more suited for relic use, but wouldn't it be better to have a more powerful unit you could turn
down rather than a less powerful unit you couldn't turn up?
Since I live in Central Florida, ground mineralization is just not an issue. Pulled many nice coins at
depths up to 6 inches back in the late 70's using a White's TR discriminator. Weight, operational
stability, and discrimination differentiation (or recovery speed as some call it) are more important
and all three of these machines would certainly "fit the bill". I'm in no hurry as I'm stockpiling the
cash to make a buy but would truly appreciate some input from experienced TNet members.
I also have a question regarding coil size selection for coin hunting but will save that for the
"General Discussion" forum.
Thanks guys (and gals!)