Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd stay with the Cap bust dime theory if I was you. I think it's just damaged which is making the mm's off.The weight is more right for a bad worn cap bust dime the bust looks like it & I see the two SS's in states on the Rev.
Take Care,
Pete,
That could be. The reason I steered away from Capped in the first place was the fact that just above the ribbons, on the capped bust coins the design has a large recess in it, pointing back towards the base of the skull. There appears no dent in the worn coin; the design slopes down and outward toward the ribbons sticking out. Now the ribbons themselves are dead on for a capped, which is what I considered first when I saw the coin. I just don't know... I modified your photo to show the recess, pointed at it with an arrow:
View attachment 694833
Shane, I know you are monitoring this thread. Can you see the letter "S" on the back?
Your coin is in bad shape without a doubt.Just to add to this now after looking I think your coin has been so altered smashed what ever that I would almost believe it to be a Half dime myself because the cap would fit you remaining outline better & the two points of hair also would fit with it being more pointed.One thing for sure it's not a six pence.I've seen you guy's post I don't think I've missed any of them.And with what I seen it would fit with what your finding being early 1800's at the earliest late 1790's.Just to much evidence when you look at the hole picture of finds.I read in the Red Book that the Capped Bust dimes were 18.8 and 18.5mm. My coin is worn and still a tad over 20mm.
Must be good soil, to get a Silver coin to grow in diameter.I read in the Red Book that the Capped Bust dimes were 18.8 and 18.5mm. My coin is worn and still a tad over 20mm.