Tom_Restorer
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2009
- 9,793
- 48,787
- Primary Interest:
- Other
After study now a lot of the Lucayan beach coins, it is clear that every piece with the vislible (or partial) Assayer Mark has a "D" on it ([FONT="]1618-1634, full name unfortunly unknown) or the mint mark of Mexico or the correct date for the period of Assayer D! But also all coins with non vissible marks on it are in same style wich is evidense that they are too from assayer D.
The only other mentioned ship wich sunk in this area was the Ramedios wich sunk 1624 wich makes it simply impossible to have 1628 coins on board...
Now, if there are so many coins of the assayer D to find on this wreck, this means that it comes clearly from a year production and so from the pirated spanish treasure galleons!
For me, there is no "licence plate" for one of Piet Heins lost ships needed after so much evidense and I think the guys from Spink&Son [/FONT][FONT="][FONT="](or the researchers who worked for them) did a great job here !! ;-)
For me it is clear - we HAVE a real pirate tresure here :-) .... and reason enough to buy more of this coins :-)[/FONT][/FONT]
The only other mentioned ship wich sunk in this area was the Ramedios wich sunk 1624 wich makes it simply impossible to have 1628 coins on board...
Now, if there are so many coins of the assayer D to find on this wreck, this means that it comes clearly from a year production and so from the pirated spanish treasure galleons!
For me, there is no "licence plate" for one of Piet Heins lost ships needed after so much evidense and I think the guys from Spink&Son [/FONT][FONT="][FONT="](or the researchers who worked for them) did a great job here !! ;-)
For me it is clear - we HAVE a real pirate tresure here :-) .... and reason enough to buy more of this coins :-)[/FONT][/FONT]