sdcfia
Silver Member
- Sep 28, 2014
- 3,743
- 9,092
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Hi Amy,
I don't know about the others but I'm finding out that there is only so much you can do over the internet. The librarians that I've been in touch with have been great about giving me information and advice but there is only so much that they can or will do. I'm learning how to find people who will do the research for me but then I'm at the mercy of their schedule. I took a couple years of French in high school and I've even been thinking about taking some courses so I can read some of the French documents myself. It's been great. If you have a love for history, there's never a dull moment.
This legend appears to hinge on the report that allegedly made its way back to New Orleans or France via the sole survivor. The fact that the earliest published accounts (supplied by you here and by Adams' books) exist at all in fair but conflicting detail seems to indicate that if such an original report exists, somebody may have used it at some point in the 1800s. If so, the cache may have been recovered long ago, but if so, it seems that we would know the whereabouts of the now-empty shaft/tunnel/well.
Also, with the great number of trappers (many French) active in the cache area ca 1820-1850 and wintering in Taos, it seems some skuttlebut should have been mentioned in the many Spanish reports, trappers's memoirs and early Santa Fe Trail info from the period. I've read a lot of the trappers and SFT stuff, but not the Spanish documents or the French - if they exist. mdog, you might have to travel to Chihuahua, New Orleans and somewhere in France to track down these possible whispers. I'd start in France.
Of course, the possibility remains that the legend was invented as a cover story loosely based on cloudy historical events in order to obscure and divert attention away from other more recent activities in the same vicinity. Wouldn't be the first time.