THE LARGEST TREASURE IN MODERN TIMES

[XLV]

RN 30 JUST SO U DONT THINK AM JUST ALL BS I TELL ONE AREA OF THIS PLACE ... APO ISLAND oct 26 1944 67 years later i even KNOW how many was on board the plane 6 that float plane had no gold no bxxbs no guns removed so extra 4 that model only for 2 .... DUMAGUETE AIRPORT a long time friend fisherman show me the some parts he found in 80 feet of water off the stillman beach i swim there ....i told him that wasnt from a fighter model plane that parts were from a training model plane probably crashed pilot error or bad fuel old old guy living there fisher men said he seen it in 1944.....VALENCIA ,,,up on a mountain side u need ropes to get to this one make a billy goat sick ... my guess a japanese army fighter plane maybe... it was so picked by the vultures i couldnt tell .... SANTA CATALINA up on the horns guy told me a trainer or transport plane am guessing i never went to this site am not that crazy to climb up there,,, BASAY driver at 100 feet found a light bxxber complete eye witness said 1945 3 crew shoot on beach ,,,i could go on and on ...RN30 I HOPE U GET THE BIG PICTURE i find stuff plus 60 years ,,,,but not the same day ....and to the tourist experts yes this is all fake news like in nyc treasure can still out there yes rn30 ....good luck

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[renantagum30]

wow. i really admired you got the information sir and there is a good chance of recovering it if you have a living witness. no. i did not think ur a bullshit. i believe you are the real deal and things like that are worthy to be validated had i been more financially capable like i was few years ago. now , i dont have the capability to do that.

you are one of the person who has personal experiences in yamashita treasure. its like you are one of the doctors who has the authority to speak about how to treat diseases or speak authoritatively about medicine and other fields only doctors would know. a beggar who has no education cannot speak authoritatively about medicine and anything a doctor would be capable to speak of.

the same in this forum, the one who keeps on telling we are speaking craps here is the person who does not have an experience in yamashita treasure hunting or digging.

 

[renantagum30]

i have learned to accept the fact already that there is more to life than risking your life , time and money chasing the yamashita treasure. its time to get serious in life and focus more on the realistic and achievable goals. i have been learning to be at peace with myself already. treasure hunting is not for me. but treasure chatting, maybe.

 

[XLV]

RD30 ,,,,they cant understand that MAP (tourist its fake right away ) (local its treasure right away) ....a guy with a book of maps who knows what its says and even knows the codes because he type of the ones that draw those maps ....who married countless women ,,,who spent millions of dollars ,,, who on the most wanted list for hygrading treasure ,,,u know u cant show it you show u lose it that was ROXAS mistake he didnt have a army and godfather(marcos ) did ,,,not smart know your limitations ......BOOBY TRAP ( to a local any thing military ) ( to a real treasure hunter military knowledge bs ) but am glad this rumor started its save lives ...theres lots of bxxbs to a local with a detector its treasure....how many got killed in the last junk shop 6 just for the steel .... and yes i seen a submarine going down roxas blvd and big navy ships to ,,,u as a roman know but some tourist am nothing but fake news .....u see a bus underwater in a typhoon thats a submarine ,,,,not a lie that diesel exit on the top of that bus right well in roman a bus got a snorkel to ...so both u romans and tourist better know the big pictures first ...

 

[Tom_in_CA]

may i ask if it was you who discredited the roxas story? despite the us court judgement?

Renantagum, The problem I have with answering this question, is several-fold:

1) you ask if it was ME (Tom-in-CA) who discredited this story. Why would you say that ? Why wouldn't you wonder if Tom-in-CA had sources he drew from ? Just as you draw PRO-treasure story view, from outside sources. Right ? So too do I have sources from which I've made this conclusion.

I mean, turn the tables, and .... if I said it in that tone to you. Ie.: "Why do you believe the story? Just because renantagum credits it ?" You would say: "No. It's because I have xyz texts, books, links, etc..." Right ? So why not give me the equal benefit of the doubt, that ... I too have text and link, that I could show you, that support my notions ?

So the mere fact you phrase it that way, makes me think you'd be biased about ANY source that crosses your notions/beliefs. Whether from me, or anyone else. Rather than looking at the merits and possibilities of the debate points on their own merits. This is what's known as 'genetic fallacy' : Instead of looking at the weight of the argument on its own merits, you say : "Well, so & so said that, and he's a mean person, so it doesn't count". Rather than looking at the evidence itself.

Whether the person saying it is democrat, republic, straight, gay, mean, nice, etc... Makes no difference: 2+2=4 NO MATTER WHO SAYS IT.

If I have misunderstood your tone in that, please forgive me.

2) "Despite the court judgement" : This tells me you've taken one of the points of the story, and ... in your mind ... makes it all rock solid credible. WHICH IS FINE. I understand that. But you can see where this is all going to go :

The only way I can describe it is to give this analogy : If I attempt to show you the holes in the Roxas story (ie.: more plausible explanations), and ... . let's say we start with the "court judgement", here's an analogy of what would happen next :

When the TV show about Oak Island came on, it started a flurry of discussions on T'net. Right ? You have the believers and the non-believer's right ? Well me, with my fascination into "treasure psychology", studied all the pro con thread debates. And here's an example of what would happen: (I'm just using generalities, so don't get "lost in the example of dates and such)

a) Un-believer says: "The fiber, said to have been in the hole at XX # of feet down, wasn't introduced to north american continent till 1850.

b) Thus unbeliever concludes it was impossible for this hole to have been dug in the 1700's.

c) But the treasure believer, faced with this impediment to their beliefs, surmises that coconut fibers *could* have drifted across the ocean currents. And thus been gathered on the shores of north America . Thus allowing this fiber to have introduced to north america in time for the story to have occurred.

d) The skeptics say: "But the fibers would have become water logged, and sunk before ever reaching north America". (That devolves into a 10 page thread on the science of wind, porpoises, sea turtles, buoyancy of fibers, etc... )

e) To which the believers say : Well .... not if they're of the rare Australian coconut variety. Which as 50% more buoyancy than the African variety (which devolves into a 10 page thread on currents, etc...)

And do you see the PING PONG MATCH that ensues ? And the whole time, I'm sitting there thinking: What the heck difference does it make about if or how fiber could or couldn't get there ?? As if .... the ESTABLISHMENT of the matter would necessarily make the treasure true ? In other words, to the believer's mind's eyes, if they win the science debate on the coconut fibers, then THERE MUST BE A TREASURE THERE. But to me, I'm thinking: Wait, if there's no treasure, there, then what the heck does debate on coconut fiber buoyancy prove ? SO TOO DO I FEAR OUR ROXAS DISCUSSION COULD DEVOLVE TO

I fear you will do just as the Oak Island debate did: Devolve into ping pong. Where, in essence, what it will boil down to is: If you can find ANY way in which a point *could* possibly be true, then it is ... OF NECESSITY true. In other words, it puts the burden of proof on me to prove it ISN'T there , lest it is, of necessity, there.

To give you an analogy: I can make the claim that unicorns exist. You can say: "That's silly. Unicorns are mythical. I've never seen one, there's no photos of one. There's no skeletal fossil evidence, etc.... I can say the reason you don't see those things, is that the unicorns are invisible. And that government officials do a hush conspiracy job to hide the fossil evidence. Do you see how YOU CAN'T DISPROVE ANY THAT ? Since, of course, you can't prove that invisible things exist, or to disprove the coverup (it's secret after all). But wait: Does the mere fact you can't disprove what I just said, PROVE UNICORNS EXIST ? No. Of course not.

So on the contrary, the burden of proof to prove unicorns exist, would fall on the believer to prove. Not on the non-believer to dis-prove. Same for the Yamashita legend. The fact that there is a 1 in 100 chance that something *could* happen, doesn't mean it therefore, of necessity "100% truly happened". In fact, it means there's a 99% chance it DIDN'T happen.

I am perfectly willing to show you the weaknesses, flaws of the Roxas story. And the more plausible explanations. Complete with links. BUT YOU MUST PROMISE ME THAT :

a) you will not devolve into a ping-pong match. I can not, like the Oak Island silly threads, devolve into a debate that never ends. You are welcome to disagree. Because you've found some remote possible way (conspiracies to hide evidence, etc....). That's fine. But , promise me we'll drop it after I show you my thoughts on the Roxas matter.

b) you will be open-minded.

Do we agree ?

 

[XLV]

RD30 THAT SCHOLAR BASES HIS FACTS ON OTHER SCHOLARS FACTS .....U ROMANS LIVE THERE U ONLY KNOW WHAT U UNDERSTAND ....TO THE ROMANS COLUMBUS DIDNT DISCOVER AMERICA ...MAGELLAN DIDNT SAIL AROUND THE WORLD I COULD GO ON FOR EVER ....U BELIEVE RD30 WHAT U THINK SOUNDS RIGHT WHAT NORMAL TO ROMAN ,,, THERES NO MOSSAD NO MAFIA NO CIA ONLY PIRATES ONE GROUP HID IT TWO FINDING IT ONE PIRATE GROUP SMARTER THEN THE OTHER ,,,

 

[XLV]

RD30 U TAKE A SCHOLAR AND A TOURIST SAY ON HUNT IN JERSEY CITY THE TOURIST KNOWS FRIENDS THERE ....U ALL GO A ON A HUNT FOR 2 BLACK NUGGETS U ALL FIND DUST SIZE NUGGETS ,,,BUT THE SCHOLAR SAYS NO BLACK NUGGETS NO BIG SILVER BIRDS ....BUT LEGEND WAS THERE WERE BIG SILVER BIRDS ...2 SEEN ....so the SCHOLAR NO BLACK NUGGETS COULDNT NEVER BEEN 757 SILVER BIRDS ,,,,,,,SO RD 30 MAKE GREAT FRIENDS WITH DU30 THE MAN OF STEEL AND U MIGHT HAVE A CHANCE OF BEING ON THAT MAGAZINE ,,,,I had dinner with roxas in dumaguete the guy that ran for office he didnt feed me to the fish .... but the scholar fake news no my gf was running noy-noy campaign know the big picture rd30 and good luck

 

[: Michael-Robert.]

Never give up my friend. You are in a very Treasure Rich area.