symbols that need interpreting

kiddrock33

Hero Member
Jun 14, 2003
688
12
Massachusetts
a bizarre set of symbols need some explaining. has anyone heard anything concerning a cache of artifacts laid out in a very precise manner. such as using artifacts in a manner to produce images like a type of art? like when an artist uses household trash to make a sculpture. lets say i saw heavy chains arranged to form a beard and hair on a mans face who looks very much like the celtic god the holly king. or a statues broken arm holding a heart shaped padlock dropping it into a bucket. or two swords crossed to form an X. look for the curl near bottem
 

kiddrock33 said:
hmm maybe your computer has poor resolution. i just thought i might shed new information out to the crowd . let him who has eyes see. how about a crown for a queen.
I'm running dual Dell flat-screens.

Maybe if you had higher-resolution pics, perhaps? A larger image would be helpful, too.
 

Why are the pictures so small? Also since the subject view is also rather constricted it's hard to make out anything. These pictures remind me of someone with a flash light trying to take a picture of the Grand Canyon.
 

Kiddrock33!!
I too see the face with chain hair and beard, I have witnessed some strange things and arrangements since making this my "hobby", getting to the point where it is hard to be amazed anymore. Like how could ordinary men have done this? Is this fresh water? Great tracking job!! Stay Safe Bro. TD
 

Hi Kidd!! Good to see you again. Your pic in reply #4 does indeed appear to be a crown. I can clearly see the circlet with a couple raised pieces along the edge. No idea if it IS a crown or not, but interesting nonetheless.

I'm still waiting for that CD of pics and vids from your site you promised me!! It's ok tho, I'm a patient fella.

Here's an idea, why don't you start your own thread here is this section of the forums. From what I've seen you post before and the email pics u sent me it's a very intriguing site you're working. Start a thread similar to Old Dog's. Chronicle your adventure studded with a lot of your more interesting pics. I'm sure you'd get a readership following!

Good luck, play safe.
 

Kidd,
we have discussed this before , and if I am rehashing old news please forgive me.
But it is very hard to make any kind of opinion when the picture has the resolution less than a postage stamp.

I know I have asked before if you would post a larger picture.
If you want to send a full resolution photo I will be happy to size it so it is of an acceptable size to post.

your friend
Thom
old dog
 

Did I miss you saying? Are these more underwater photos from your site?

You must understand how difficult these are to see... is there NO better pics?
 

Hey KR,

I have to agree that if you want any real input on your pics, you definitely need to resize them. To post them online, you really need to make them at least six inches wide. You have to realize that all we can see are little one inch square, very dark, badly lit, underwater photographs.

Best-Mike
 

Hi Kidd. I admit some of your pics appear to have some intriging looking "things". I hope they turn out to be what you claim. About the disk, that sux cause I never received it. My Mom raised me better than that, I would've at least said a "Thank-you." lol

I sent u a PM.
 

Honestly, though.

You've had these pics for quite some time. If you really believe the things you say you see in them, why haven't you done anything about it up to now? ??? ::)
 

Kidd,

Am trying with these pics.
Have a friend who may be able to enlarge and enhance.

will see what I can come up with.

Some just can't understand the factors involved when dealing with a site .
Especially trying to find someone to hunt with that you can trust.
Hunting alone is hard, and even worse when you have to dive on a site.
to top it all off you may need to get permits to even consider an entry, before you dive.

Some people have no concept of anything ...

Thom
 

af1733 said:
Honestly, though.

You've had these pics for quite some time. If you really believe the things you say you see in them, why haven't you done anything about it up to now? ??? ::)

As Thom just pointed out af1733 there is more to the story that obviously you are unaware of. Kidd has been exploring this site for awhile now and there are several factors that I can recall from conversations with him.

1. The remoteness of his site
2. Pitch black underground cave filled with water
3. Said cave and water have a strong current constantly rearranging the bottom and reducing visability.
4. He's not a scuba diver
5. I am. I have never done cave diving before but know people who have. It is a dangerous undertaking not to be trifled with. I have done ice diving, not as dangerous but similiar in my opinion.
6. To my knowledge he only has 1 partner, a friend of his, who is also not a diver.
7. I remember his early attempts to get a look inside the cave. He had to jerry-rig all kinds of funny home made contraptions just to get any sort of lighting and pictures at all.

I know I am speaking for Kidd but I hope that answers your question.
 

Kidd,
This is the best I can do :)
Looks like you might have something there.
 

Attachments

  • chestEdited.jpg
    chestEdited.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 1,018
  • treasure 061Edited.jpg
    treasure 061Edited.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 1,028
  • treasure 573-edited.jpg
    treasure 573-edited.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 1,044
At least this site offers intriquing possibilities... might just be crap, might be tremendous treasure.

Good luck, and I sure hope you can find a diver to help you out... you outta be taking lessons or something and just learn to dive it yourself? Even if it takes years you know the stuff isn't going anyplace.
 

CanadianTrout said:
af1733 said:
Honestly, though.

You've had these pics for quite some time. If you really believe the things you say you see in them, why haven't you done anything about it up to now? ??? ::)

As Thom just pointed out af1733 there is more to the story that obviously you are unaware of. Kidd has been exploring this site for awhile now and there are several factors that I can recall from conversations with him.

1. The remoteness of his site
2. Pitch black underground cave filled with water
3. Said cave and water have a strong current constantly rearranging the bottom and reducing visability.
4. He's not a scuba diver
5. I am. I have never done cave diving before but know people who have. It is a dangerous undertaking not to be trifled with. I have done ice diving, not as dangerous but similiar in my opinion.
6. To my knowledge he only has 1 partner, a friend of his, who is also not a diver.
7. I remember his early attempts to get a look inside the cave. He had to jerry-rig all kinds of funny home made contraptions just to get any sort of lighting and pictures at all.

I know I am speaking for Kidd but I hope that answers your question.

Okay, all of this makes sense, but here's another point for you to ponder.

If this location is so difficult to access, then how were these items put there to begin with?

Surely you don't believe that the people that placed these items there were somehow more advanced in their techniques and equipment that what is available now?

Also, these items, if they aren't simply natural which is something that seriously needs to be taken into consideration, were almost certainly not dumped there, disposed of, if you will. It would make sense that the people that put these things there were going to return for them at some point. It makes sense they would want them not to be stumbled onto accidentally and recovered by another party, but there's also the fact that they wouldn't want to lose their own lives to recover what they themselves had hidden.
 

Old Dog said:
Kidd,

Am trying with these pics.
Have a friend who may be able to enlarge and enhance.

will see what I can come up with.

Some just can't understand the factors involved when dealing with a site .
Especially trying to find someone to hunt with that you can trust.
Hunting alone is hard, and even worse when you have to dive on a site.
to top it all off you may need to get permits to even consider an entry, before you dive.

Some people have no concept of anything ...

Thom
You don't know anything about me, Thom, so how can you make such a ridiculous and assumptive statement such as this? Not only is it incorrect, it's also impossible.

Concept:
1. A general idea derived or inferred from specific instances or occurrences.
2. Something formed in the mind; a thought or notion.

It's a fact that the human brain is always thinking of something, no matter what the subject. If you had taken the time to do a little research before writing this post, you would have known this.

I have a concept, alright. It has a lot to do with the mind seeing what it wants to see, rather than what is there. I saw these pictures the first time Kidd posted them, and I've seen them again here, and neither time did anything man-made jump out at me. I'm looking that them with a practiced eye as I make a hobby of photography.

A camera takes a picture of what is in front of it, and nothing more, but an overactive imagination can add all sorts of things to a picture, things which don't exist.

I see nothing of consequence in Kidd's pictures. I know this won't dissuade him in his search, nor is that my intention.

But he posted these pictures here on this public forum to get other people's opinions. If he only wanted positive comments, then he should have emailed them only to his friends and others that would give him positive feedback. But he didn't do this, did he? Because of this he, and you, has to be prepared to have someone disagree with their opinions.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top