- Jul 27, 2006
- 49,143
- 56,780
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
On Rush Limbaughâs Thursday program, George Mason University professor Walter E. Williams outlined the case that states can nullify Obamacare, citing Thomas Jeffersonâs 1789 Kentucky Resolution, which was a claim that the U. S. Constitution is a compact among the several states, and any power not delegated to the U.S. government is void.
âI think the American citizens ought to press their state governors and legislatures just to nullify the law â just to plain nullify it and say, âThe citizens of such-and-such-a state donât have to obey Obamacare because itâs unconstitutional, regardless of what the Supreme Court says,ââ Williams said.
Williams cited Marbury v. Madison, which said âall laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and voidâ to further the case for nullification from the states.
Nullification is a doctrine introduced in the infancy of the United States and was what some have suggested led to the Civil War. As far as the legal precedent of nullification and how it led to the Civil War, Williams said he doubted the repercussions would as serious as they were in 1861.
âI think two things are different this time,â he said. âFirst, most Americans are against Obamacare. And secondly, I donât believe â and you call me up and tell me if Iâm wrong about this â I donât believe that you could find a United States soldier who would follow a presidential order to descend on a state to round up or shoot fellow Americans because they refuse to follow a congressional order to buy health insurance.â
Town Hall
5/16/2012
Should We Obey All Laws?
Walter E. Williams
Letâs think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a law â and the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional â requiring American families to attend church services at least three times a month. Should we obey such a law? Suppose Congress, acting under the Constitutionâs commerce clause, enacted a law requiring motorists to get eight hours of sleep before driving on interstate highways. Its justification might be that drowsy motorists risk highway accidents and accidents affect interstate commerce. Suppose you were a jury member during the 1850s and a free person were on trial for assisting a runaway slave, in clear violation of the Fugitive Slave Act. Would you vote to convict and punish?
A moral person would find each one of those laws either morally repugnant or to be a clear violation of our Constitution. You say, âWilliams, youâre wrong this time. In 1859, in Ableman v. Booth, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 constitutional.â That court decision, as well as some others in our past, makes my case. Moral people canât rely solely on the courts to establish whatâs right or wrong. Slavery is immoral; therefore, any laws that support slavery are also immoral. In the words of Thomas Jefferson, âto consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions (is) a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.â
Soon, the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare, euphemistically titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.*There is absolutely no constitutional authority for Congress to force any American to enter into a contract to buy any good or service. But if the court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, what should we do?
State governors and legislators ought to summon up the courage of our Founding Fathers in response to the 5th Congressâ Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. Led by Jefferson and James Madison, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 were drafted where legislatures took the position that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. They said, âResolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government ⌠(and) whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.â The 10th Amendment to our Constitution supports that vision: âThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.â
In a word, if the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, citizens should press their state governors and legislatures to nullify the law. You say, âWilliams, the last time states got into this nullification business, it led to a war that cost 600,000 lives.â Two things are different this time. First, most Americans are against Obamacare, and secondly, I donât believe that you could find a U.S. soldier who would follow a presidential order to descend on a state to round up or shoot down fellow Americans because they refuse to follow a congressional order to buy health insurance.
Congress has already gone far beyond the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. In Federalist No. 45, Madison explained: âThe powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.â That vision has been turned on its head; itâs the federal government whose powers are numerous and indefinite, and those of the state are now few and defined.
Former slave Frederick Douglass advised: âFind out just what people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them. âŚ
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.â
States Can Nullify Obamacare - Obamacare - Forced Health Insurance
Sent from my new Galaxy Note3
now Free
âI think the American citizens ought to press their state governors and legislatures just to nullify the law â just to plain nullify it and say, âThe citizens of such-and-such-a state donât have to obey Obamacare because itâs unconstitutional, regardless of what the Supreme Court says,ââ Williams said.
Williams cited Marbury v. Madison, which said âall laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and voidâ to further the case for nullification from the states.
Nullification is a doctrine introduced in the infancy of the United States and was what some have suggested led to the Civil War. As far as the legal precedent of nullification and how it led to the Civil War, Williams said he doubted the repercussions would as serious as they were in 1861.
âI think two things are different this time,â he said. âFirst, most Americans are against Obamacare. And secondly, I donât believe â and you call me up and tell me if Iâm wrong about this â I donât believe that you could find a United States soldier who would follow a presidential order to descend on a state to round up or shoot fellow Americans because they refuse to follow a congressional order to buy health insurance.â
Town Hall
5/16/2012
Should We Obey All Laws?
Walter E. Williams
Letâs think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a law â and the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional â requiring American families to attend church services at least three times a month. Should we obey such a law? Suppose Congress, acting under the Constitutionâs commerce clause, enacted a law requiring motorists to get eight hours of sleep before driving on interstate highways. Its justification might be that drowsy motorists risk highway accidents and accidents affect interstate commerce. Suppose you were a jury member during the 1850s and a free person were on trial for assisting a runaway slave, in clear violation of the Fugitive Slave Act. Would you vote to convict and punish?
A moral person would find each one of those laws either morally repugnant or to be a clear violation of our Constitution. You say, âWilliams, youâre wrong this time. In 1859, in Ableman v. Booth, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 constitutional.â That court decision, as well as some others in our past, makes my case. Moral people canât rely solely on the courts to establish whatâs right or wrong. Slavery is immoral; therefore, any laws that support slavery are also immoral. In the words of Thomas Jefferson, âto consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions (is) a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.â
Soon, the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare, euphemistically titled the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.*There is absolutely no constitutional authority for Congress to force any American to enter into a contract to buy any good or service. But if the court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, what should we do?
State governors and legislators ought to summon up the courage of our Founding Fathers in response to the 5th Congressâ Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. Led by Jefferson and James Madison, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 were drafted where legislatures took the position that the Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional. They said, âResolved, That the several States composing, the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government ⌠(and) whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force.â The 10th Amendment to our Constitution supports that vision: âThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.â
In a word, if the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is constitutional, citizens should press their state governors and legislatures to nullify the law. You say, âWilliams, the last time states got into this nullification business, it led to a war that cost 600,000 lives.â Two things are different this time. First, most Americans are against Obamacare, and secondly, I donât believe that you could find a U.S. soldier who would follow a presidential order to descend on a state to round up or shoot down fellow Americans because they refuse to follow a congressional order to buy health insurance.
Congress has already gone far beyond the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. In Federalist No. 45, Madison explained: âThe powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.â That vision has been turned on its head; itâs the federal government whose powers are numerous and indefinite, and those of the state are now few and defined.
Former slave Frederick Douglass advised: âFind out just what people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them. âŚ
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.â
States Can Nullify Obamacare - Obamacare - Forced Health Insurance
Sent from my new Galaxy Note3
now Free
