Some type of Cavalry equipment...help

alderan33

Full Member
Oct 15, 2010
249
39
Greenville, NC
Detector(s) used
Whites Spectra V3I
Garrett Pro Pointer
Minelab Etrac
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting

Attachments

  • finds six twenty five eleven batch four 001 - Copy - Copy.JPG
    finds six twenty five eleven batch four 001 - Copy - Copy.JPG
    322 KB · Views: 306
  • finds six twenty five eleven batch four 002 - Copy.JPG
    finds six twenty five eleven batch four 002 - Copy.JPG
    212.4 KB · Views: 311
another angle...
 

Attachments

  • finds six twenty five eleven batch four 003 - Copy.JPG
    finds six twenty five eleven batch four 003 - Copy.JPG
    231.5 KB · Views: 294
Upvote 0
looks like a shoulder scale attachment of some sort. If it is maybe Indian war not CW.
 

Upvote 0
rodgerdodger said:
I think if you straighten it out it would be a padlock hasp.

Now that i sized it to the quarter I think you could be right.
 

Upvote 0
Normally, padlock hasps of that era were iron, not brass. Brass is too soft and easily bent. Although I wouldn't rule it out on a trunk or chest. To me, it looks more like a belt hanger of some sort. The bend appears to be manufactured, not caused as a result of damage. I don't know enough about shoulder scales to hazard a guess on that. Certainly bears more research. Nice find!
 

Upvote 0
How about a little more information as to where and how found...

Based on condition, obviously not found in the ground (or barn), morn likely in a box of stuff...?

I'd say its something more recent in that its not dried and brittle as you'd expect for a peice of leather dating to the cavalry (late as 1940's)...
 

Upvote 0
stefen said:
I'd say its something more recent in that its not dried and brittle as you'd expect for a peice of leather dating to the cavalry (late as 1940's)...
I don't see anything but dirt impacted in it myself??? :icon_scratch:
 

Upvote 0
It was found in the ground but I can't reveal the location. Definitely Union Cavalry activity though.
 

Upvote 0
Here it is straightened out. As evidenced by the surface scratches/markings, it is obvious that it was flat originally and not folded.
It looks like it is approximately 4 1/2 inches long by scale, and the slot is roughly 3/4 of an inch. Are these fairly accurate measurements?
 

Attachments

  • hasp.jpg
    hasp.jpg
    47.7 KB · Views: 173
Upvote 0
Your mystery-object matches up with the form and measurements of the "attachment board" of an epaulette. It's the part which the turnbuckle goes through. (I know the term "attachment board" isn't a proper name, but I've never heard the proper name for that particular part of an epaulette.) That's what I thought your mystery-objet was ever since you posted the first pictures, but I needed accurate measurements to be certaib about it.
 

Attachments

  • epaulettes_dug-NewKentCounty-Virginia_underside-view_photobySgtriker.jpg
    epaulettes_dug-NewKentCounty-Virginia_underside-view_photobySgtriker.jpg
    96.5 KB · Views: 172
  • epaulettes_dug-NewKentCounty-Virginia_underside-view_photobySgtriker.jpg
    epaulettes_dug-NewKentCounty-Virginia_underside-view_photobySgtriker.jpg
    96.5 KB · Views: 162
Upvote 0
TheCannonballGuy said:
Your mystery-object matches up with the form and measurements of the "attachment board" of an epaulette. It's the part which the turnbuckle goes through. (I know the term "attachment board" isn't a proper name, but I've never heard the proper name for that particular part of an epaulette.) That's what I thought your mystery-objet was ever since you posted the first pictures, but I needed accurate measurements to be certaib about it.

That is what I thought, too, but was waiting for confirmation on the measurements.
Nice substantiating photographs!
 

Upvote 0
Creskol, just want to take this opportunity to say, it's always a pleasure working along with you to help the diggers learn the correct ID of their various unknown finds. I've appreciated your many info-contributions.
 

Upvote 0
looks good for a officers shoulder board part as shown above to me. --officers often hated wearing them as it showed who the "commander' was to enemys --uh --kill the leader * was big with indains as well as rebel snipers during the civil war --so many officers "ditched" the shoulder boards except for 'dress use' only --never for "combat patrol use" --like painting a bullseye on yourself to wear em. :wink:
 

Upvote 0
Wow! Great ID guys. Yes the measurements are correct and I believe between the two of you, this one is solved. :icon_sunny:
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top