Solution to CO2 Pollution?

[ClaimStake]

volcanos do put out a good amount of co2. however,

from;http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/archive/2007/07_02_15.html;
"This seems like a huge amount of CO2, but a visit to the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) website (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)) helps anyone armed with a handheld calculator and a high school chemistry text put the volcanic CO2 tally into perspective. Because while 200 million tonnes of CO2 is large, the global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes. Thus, not only does volcanic CO2 not dwarf that of human activity, it actually comprises less than 1 percent of that value."


I must point out though that anything composting produces large amounts of co2 as well.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[ClaimStake]

co2 is an inert gas.

also, co2 breaks down in UV light. in the upper atmosphere it'll separate back into O2 and carbon (charcoal and graphene nanoparticles). which causes what's called carbon fallout which dims the atmosphere and inhibits light.

if you're wondering what the thermal properties of nano carbons check this out.



I want a truck made of that...can we say 007.

 

[kcm]

volcanos do put out a good amount of co2. however,

from;http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/archive/2007/07_02_15.html;
"This seems like a huge amount of CO2, but a visit to the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) website (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)) helps anyone armed with a handheld calculator and a high school chemistry text put the volcanic CO2 tally into perspective. Because while 200 million tonnes of CO2 is large, the global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes. Thus, not only does volcanic CO2 not dwarf that of human activity, it actually comprises less than 1 percent of that value."


I must point out though that anything composting produces large amounts of co2 as well.

Not to mention everything that's breathing.

CO2 isn't a "problem". As noted above, very deep ice cores have shown much higher levels of CO2 than what we currently have - during times of massive ice coverage. How could that be possible when there were no automobiles, there were no powerplants, there was no large-scale farming, ranching or industry?

No matter where you look for "numbers" they can only be guesses at best.

Did you know there is a rock type that is very dense and heavy, yet made up of more than 50% Oxygen?? It's true. Many rocks also hold CO2, as well as there being many natural sub-surface CO2 depositories. I've yet to see any article or any numbers that's all-inclusive. Until that happens, I have to go with found and known historical fact over modern numbers. Most of the time, the Gov't has very one-sided numbers, especially when concerning environmental things. It's great to want to keep the environment clean. I'm ALL FOR that! It's another thing altogether to throw out "part" of the numbers and then make the case that we're destroying the world.

If the Earth's temperature were to rise, there would be more moisture in the atmosphere. More moisture in the atmosphere means there is more Oxygen and Hydrogen in the atmosphere. Various different naturally occurring environmental factors can change the H2O into separate Hydrogen and Oxygen gases, including lightening. These more these (and other) gases are released to the atmosphere, the more diluted atmospheric CO2 levels are.

The truth can ONLY be true if it is 100% true.

 

[ClaimStake]

........

to add,
H2O, CO2, CO, SO2. and many other molecules will break down into their lower components at varying altitudes, being bombarded by UV, cosmic rays, microwaves, gamma ect.

also for those that don't know the military's of the world have an assortment of weather manipulation tech. but that's a whole other topic.

google the term "chemtrail".

 

[Mad Machinist]

volcanos do put out a good amount of co2. however,

from;http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/archive/2007/07_02_15.html;
"This seems like a huge amount of CO2, but a visit to the U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) website (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)) helps anyone armed with a handheld calculator and a high school chemistry text put the volcanic CO2 tally into perspective. Because while 200 million tonnes of CO2 is large, the global fossil fuel CO2 emissions for 2003 tipped the scales at 26.8 billion tonnes. Thus, not only does volcanic CO2 not dwarf that of human activity, it actually comprises less than 1 percent of that value."


I must point out though that anything composting produces large amounts of co2 as well.

Umm, no. Not even close.

Anything that can erupt and change not only global weather patterns but global temperatures has far more effect than is often mentioned. It seems to me that they have the numbers reversed.

Not to mention the fact that they cannot figure out what is happening to approximately half of the CO2 produced every year. Got a heads up for them, take a look at recent plant growth trends.

 

[kcm]

Got a heads up for them, take a look at recent plant growth trends.

Yeah! My yard is growing like....well, WEEDS!

Sorry, couldn't resist. This having to mow every 3 days is getting ridiculous!


As I said, I trust hard evidence much more than numbers. Numbers have a way of not being accurate. That's because they come from humans, who also have a knack for not being accurate - especially when there's an agenda involved! And as is commonly the case, the agenda is often money.