mts
Bronze Member
- May 18, 2009
- 1,285
- 202
- Detector(s) used
- Nokta Simplex+, Nokta Pulsedive, Tesoro Vaquero, Tesoro Silver µMax, BH Tracker IV, Garrett ProPointer
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
brendan1414 said:well how long until its not corrected... lmao i want it to go back up, and i want real answers. people gve alot of BS on here that they just read, and its just ear candy... obvious by how everyone thought it wouldnt go down a penny, and "never" go below $45. HA!
Looks like there are an awful lot of "old crows" on here that are "eating crow" right now. Enjoy it while it lasts. Some of these jerks had the audacity to claim you couldn't know what you are talking about because you are too young! In the meantime, they proved that they don't know what they are talking about (because they are too old?). That includes me as well.
But I hear you. There are people on here who will announce that silver SHOULD be $100 to $150 right now as if it is gospel. All the while they have come to this conclusion based on the following misguided principles:
1) The original 15:1 gold to silver ratio - This was price manipulation at its finest. When the government stopped fixing the price, the gold to silver ratio changed dramatically. Why anyone would assume that this ratio has any meaning at all in modern times is baffling to me.
2) Inflation adjusted price from 1980's - The Hunt brothers created a temporary price anomaly for a couple of months back in the 80's. Yet people continuously use this wacky price to calculate the current inflation adjusted price. It makes no sense. If silver went up to $2000 tomorrow on false info that a meteor was going to take out Manhattan, would it then make sense to use this price blip to say that silver should rightfully be $4000 an ounce 20 years from now?!? Why don't people quote the inflation adjusted price from 1960? 1970? 1990? 2000? I guess we all know the answer to that question now don't we?
3) The current price of gold - So many people assume that the current price of gold is correct. But what if gold should really only be $750 an ounce instead of $1500? Even using that mythical 15:1 gold ratio you'd find that silver should really be $50 an ounce. Who knows what gold will do tomorrow or next week.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm bullish on both gold and silver. What gets me are people who "KNOW" that silver is going through the roof simply because they've read a few bullish outlooks and have decided to pick and choose what they want to believe. Then those same people go on to tell someone like Brendan that he doesn't know what he is talking about because he is too young. Whatever.
I have no problem admitting that I have no idea where silver is going to go tomorrow or next week. I'm bullish long term so it doesn't really matter to me. But some of you need to stop the wishful thinking and start thinking for yourselves. If you are using any of the three principles above as justification for why silver MUST be going to $100+ an ounce, perhaps you should step back and consider your beliefs a bit before trying to tell everyone else that silver has nowhere to go but up. It may indeed go up long term. Or... it could also go down. I'm happy to admit that I'm not smart enough to know what it is going to do. And that's not because I'm too young to know any better at 42 years old...