Shelter vs Open Air digging

1320

Silver Member
Dec 10, 2004
3,436
2,311
East Central Kentucky
Several Tnet members have been frowned upon over the years for digging in shelters and quite frankly most of the ill will comes from either uneducated or philosophically differing opinions.

First and foremost, some think that an exclusive ban of digging shelters on Federal land exists…well, kinda…..ALL digging is banned.

Some think that shelter digging is banned on private property while open air sites are legal. Why would a shelter be off limits while an open air site is ok? Doesn’t make much sense at all. The advocates against shelter digging have a bad habit of trying to interpret State laws and often bend/misquote them to keep you out of a shelter. They do the same with open air sites too but for some reason, they make rock shelters out to be some mythical shrine that unlocks the key of native man. One thing is certain, there are no Federal laws that address private property digging in individual states. Anyone that makes a blanket statement that ALL rock shelter digging is illegal is terribly misinformed and is most likely venting a personal philosophy.

Some think that the archeological record in a shelter is significantly greater than can be found on an open air site…absolutely no truth. Most shelters were used temporarily. Only a brief snap shot of the lives of native man can be captured in a shelter. I would argue that native man didn’t like spending too much time in a shelter…ever camped out in one? A great argument can be made that open air sites provide better quantity and better quality artifacts by comparison. If you want a diversity of tools….look for an open air site. The best understanding of native man has and will continue to come from open air sites.

Graves? Graves are not exclusive to rock shelters, native man has graves all over the planet. You are just as likely to dig up a grave in an open air site. Graves in a rock shelter for the most part are not recognizable as such. The dampness destroys organic matter rather quick. Open air sites create much better preservation of organic matter. Most rock shelters are wet or damp 24/7/365.

Most shelter naysayers will scream at the top of their lungs that you need to stop digging in that shelter and call in an archaeologist. That’s the best one of all! There are few archaeologists that specifically target rock shelters and the reasons are abundant and if you know anything about archeology you would understand. No particular order….

1. Hard to find a pristine rock shelter. Most have been dug in, dug at, used for other purposes by modern man. It’s all about context. Archeologists don’t approach shelters today like they did in years past. It’s not about the arrowheads anymore. It’s about plasma, resins, fibers, seeds, climatology, natural disasters, etc. If the matrix of the shelter is disturbed it doesn’t get a professional analysis, period.

2. Rock shelter excavations don’t add substance to what we already know. The data that the pros seek is too far gone due to dampness, water damage and mankind’s alteration. Rock shelter excavations create more questions…pieces of the puzzle are forever missing and archeologist don’t engage in conjure/speculation anymore.

3. If a shelter does get a profession look, it’s most often because an amateur made a discovery of significance AND the shelter is pristine…play the lottery…

4. Multi occupation (light bulb goes off). Native man did his own digging in rock shelters. He buried food, cached tools and food supplies. Cave critters love to dig, burrow and cache as well. Historic man has used shelters for housing live stock, collecting salt peter, moonshining, etc. Fence posts were dug to hang fences, trenches were built and buried collect salt peter….all of these simple acts rearrange the context and make study worthless. Very few rock shelters stratify like open air sites…it’s called sand.


Naysaying is ok in my book, it's engaging and I think it can be used constructively both ways. However, I regret that we have so few members now that will post anything from a shelter dig. I wish you guys would come back. I enjoyed seeing the images of the shelters period, the artifacts coming from them was a bonus. I for one, posted my home State's laws regarding this matter but it did little to change the mindset of a few folks which did upset me a tad but I'm not gonna let it stop me from posting from here on out. Shelter lovers, get ready!
 

Upvote 0
Good post 1320....
 

I'm glad you took the time out of your day to make those clarifications to those who may not have had a clear understanding. A lack of good and correct information leads to alot of assumption and misunderstanding. Good post...well timed also.
 

Last edited:
Love love rock shelters!!
 

Attachments

  • image-308785708.jpg
    image-308785708.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 116
  • image-1106872202.jpg
    image-1106872202.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 118
  • image-2797562533.jpg
    image-2797562533.jpg
    71.5 KB · Views: 144
Please remember, it is against Federal law to dig in any cave or rock shelter on any "Federal" land......

"Cave - The term ''cave'' means any naturally occurring void, cavity, recess, or system of interconnected passages which occurs beneath the surface of the earth or within a cliff or ledge (including any cave resource therein, but not including any vug, mine, tunnel, aqueduct, or other manmade excavation) and which is large enough to permit an individual to enter, whether or not the entrance is naturally formed or manmade. Such term shall include any natural pit, sinkhole, or other feature, which is an extension of the entrance..."

Section. 4306. Prohibited acts and criminal penalties

(a) Prohibited acts
(1) Any person who, without prior authorization from the Secretary knowingly destroys, disturbs, defaces, mars, alters, removes or harms any significant cave or alters the free movement of any animal or plant life into or out of any significant cave located on Federal lands, or enters a significant cave with the intention of committing any act described in this paragraph shall be punished in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.
(2) Any person who possesses, consumes, sells, barters or exchanges, or offers for sale, barter or exchange, any cave resource from a significant cave with knowledge or reason to know that such resource was removed from a significant cave located on Federal lands shall be punished in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.
(3) Any person who counsels, procures, solicits, or employs any other person to violate any provisions of this subsection shall be punished in accordance with section (FOOTNOTE 1) (b) of this section.(FOOTNOTE 1) So in original. Probably should be ''subsection''.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be deemed applicable to any person who was in lawful possession of a cave resource from a significant cave prior to November 18, 1988.
(b) Punishment
The punishment for violating any provision of subsection (a) of this section shall be imprisonment of not more than one year or a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of title 18, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent violation, the punishment shall be imprisonment of not more than 3 years or a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of title 18, or both.

-SOURCE-
(Pub. L. 100-691, Sec. 7, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4549.)


16 USC CHAPTER 63 - FEDERAL CAVE RESOURCES PROTECTION -CITE-

There also may be state laws against digging caves and or shelters, some states have laws against it others dont have them so be sure to check your local laws.

TreasureNet by no means advocates or condones breaking any laws, State or Federal in the persuit of your hobby.....
 

Thanks for your time 1320 I agree with a lot of things you said in your post while I emphatically disagree with you on a few things. From my experience ancients wouldn't generally occupy a wet shelter they were smarter than that. And yes for the most part shelters were only inhabited for short periods of time, and yes I have occupied them on several occasions for days at a time while root hunting in the summer months. I found it to be quite relaxing and I had it pretty easy going I was out of the rain, I had a place to cook but it was summer weather and i had store bought rations. The ancients had it a lot harder I'm sure, but all in all it is what it is...a shelter.

You say that you can find better specimens of organic material in open air sites, I don't know where your coming from with this because I have first hand experience in dry conditions and have found things that if were open air sites...would have been deteriorated long ago.I think you have the wrong view of shelters that being that they are wet. I see lots of wet shelters in my walks through the woods each year and while they look great for a dig I wouldn't (if I were a shelter digger) go into them because I know that if they were there it was dryer then when they were and conditions have changed making digging one a mucky mess. I don't generally feel like gettin mucky lessn I have to. What I'm trying to say is that there are shelters out there that have stayed dry and with little to no air circulation and no water entry (to this day) is almost like it was vacuum packed. (I have seen this first hand)

Then you go s can gather from a shelter dig. I find that statement ridiculous like your avatar :laughing7: (we're buddies so i can say that right?) How do you know what is waiting to be discovered out there. There are man think of for instance that if found could put a different spin on the record or who knows even possibly something cothat could unlock even great mysteries of mankind as a whole. Thats a little dramatic but you know what I'm trying to say...we not but nonetheless I will be staying out of shelters just so I can sleep at night.

Oh and another thing about the la state ....well i never claimed that....I have always said that pretty much in a nutshell what treasurehunter posted that you should check your states laws and I add a little check your morality factor too.

One more t
 

Last edited:
This post wasn't directed to anyone specific, it's a blanket post, I am glad that you replied. These thoughts aren't my own, they come from several archaeologists that I have befriended and spent countless hours with in discussion. I have merely rehashed their expert opinions. Your definition of "wet" is 180 degrees turned from an archeologists view regarding what constitutes a wet shelter.

"How do we know what's waiting to be discovered (in a rock shelter)".....How do we know what's waiting to be discovered in your open air site that has a few trucks plowing through it? I can appreciate your view but few would agree with your sentiment that open sites are ok while shelters are not, it's the pot calling the kettle black in an archeologists mind, and mine as well. In a post yesterday, you asked if there were any archeologists that would agree with your thoughts on rock shelters...yes they do agree however, they disagree adamantly with your chosen method as well. Digging is digging in their eyes, open air or shelter makes no difference. But don't think that they hate us, they understand that it's legal to do what we do.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top