I don't agree the thread should be deleted. With over 4,000 investors, discussion should be had and made on Seafarer.
Anyone who holds a truth that others don't know, has the absolute responsibility to share their knowledge and educate those who are behind an investment shield. Ask yourself one question; how honest would I be if I let people invest in an interest that not only doesn't honor promises, but raises $2,067,000.00 and has yet to show any signifigant progress of any reputable sort? And more importantly, fires (2) auditing firms because questions arise on investor loyalty and current information?
And no, before it's said, it has nothing to do with lack of experience, it does however have to do with a wreck site that is awash in depth of sand and logistical problems very unique to Florida's East Coast. In some areas of that Juno Wreck Site, we faced over 50 feet of sand. With the limitations of vessel size dicatated by Florida Statute, it has become a dilema for very obvious reasons. A dilema by the way, I made Seafarer aware of while they were on the hunt for new investors and was told, point blank, if I valued my job, "I'd keep that bit of info hush, hush."
And to the so called "investor" that proposed an idea for a letter that I should write to Seafarer, really guy, give me a break. I was an honest, dedicated and fully qualified employee of Seafarer who bought into their line of crud and am now paying a very dear price for it in many ways to include looking at one of the most dismal holidays that I can remember. So no, the only apology that is owed either by writing or verbally should come from Seafarer to their investors.
Additionally, they had a chance on November 17th to be honest and make things right which they chose to ignore. Now being Irish, I will take the fight here, in Court and elsewhere until I recieve a judgment of clear and concise rightful action ordered by a Court of proper jurisdiction. Until then, I WILL NOT STOP TELLING THE TRUTH.