Report: Suspects had no gun licenses

Well, we know a little more now. They only had one gun, and illegally owned Ruger semi auto handgun. They illegally killed a policeman to illegally take his gun, but couldn't get it out of the locking holster. They built three illegal pressure cooker bombs, illegally using powder from illegal fireworks. The pistol they did have had the serial numbers illegally removed, so it was either illegally purchased or illegally stolen. They manufactured several illegal pipe bomb grenades, and illegally threw them at the police from a car that was taken illegally, and the oldest one sold illegal marijuana to finance his illegal deals. Now, would one of you liberals please tell me how doing a background check and outlawing extended magazines and so called assault rifles would have done an iota of good in stopping this? Everything they did was illegal, yet they went ahead and did it anyhow. That fact must be very hard for the average liberal to understand. Why wasn't the BATF on top of all those illegal things those Muslim jhadists were doing. Perhaps it was because the BATF was too busy trying to harass and bust legal gun owners, or maybe they were sending guns to Mexico in order to make legal gun owners look bad, or perhaps they were in Texas killing babies. Who knows, but they sure weren't where they were needed were they. And what about the Boston cops, 200 and some rounds fired in this supposed huge gunfight when they were up against only one gun, and then they didn't get a killing shot on either one. The kid had to run over his brother to kill him. Then they finally find the kid in the boat, and even though he was unarmed, they threw two or three flash bangs and fired 26 more shots, and still didn't kill him, they captured him alive. Somehow I'm getting the idea the Boston cops need a little more training. Perhaps Homeland Security can spare them some 9 mm out of the millions they have purchased, so the Boston cops can do a little target practice. Then on top of that, there wasn't any rednecks or tea party, or Christian's involved, so the media is giving the :censored: a pass, because he's a Muslim jhadist, and it's not PC to say that, so we are getting the limp :censored: liberal news media telling us he is just a "mixed up college kid." Yes sir, you libs better get the rest of us disarmed, because in a moment of madness one of us just might up and shoot a :censored: jhadist, wouldn't that just be terrible.
 

I think being a lib. should be illegal.:laughing7: Well maybe just for some, other wise we'd wouldn't have anything to laugh at.
 

Dave I am wrong person to ask, you see I don't believe in background checks or gun registration.. I believe in and support the Constitution and our Bill of Rights.

Criminals buy their guns on the street, usually hot with serial numbers removed, even without background checks the serial number of guns sold are still recorded, criminals want no paper trail at all.

They could always buy them through "Obamas Fast and Furious Gun Supply and Food Stamp Outlet" in Texas, they just have to put Mexican Drug Cartel as place of employment...


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2



AMEN, brother!!!!!
 

Suspects had no gun licenses? I'm shocked and awed.
 

Bullet proof boat? Thought they only had them on the border:dontknow:
 

Last Friday morning when the TV confirmed their names I quickly typed Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's name in Facebook (American Facebook) and i accessed his page , I clicked on this image to make it big . I couldn't figure out how to do a "screen capture" so I grabbed my camera and took this picture of my computer monitor . I didn't realize my screen was so dusty - the flash brought it out . Then I backed clicked to check out more stuff - it said "sorry this facebook page has been removed "

In one hand he's puffing on what looks like a joint - the other hand ......well ......Does anyone know what type of gun that is ?

strange how I can't find this pic anywhere on the internet .
 

Attachments

  • tam 001.jpg
    tam 001.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 80

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top