Gridwalker306
Gold Member
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So this could potentially be 10,000 years old? Pardon my ignorance, I rarely find artifacts like this while metal detecting. Thanks for your input!I'd say it's a paleo era point, was much longer originally, has been worked down to a nub and likely used as a hafted scraper at the end of its useful life. A keeper for sure!
Yes it is.So this could potentially be 10,000 years old? Pardon my ignorance, I rarely find artifacts like this while metal detecting. Thanks for your input!
That one is easy. Just look at the flaking!!!Mamucker could certainly be right but my hunch is paleo, or close I’ve got a holland that is very similar but a bit bigger
View attachment 2065259
Just to note, I believe this is a Canada find. And an interesting one.Yes it is.
I couldn't tell for sure because of the color. I see the little off-white flecks in it but not so much the typical root-beer.looks like the material is KRF...
Firstly thanks everyone for the replies, much appreciated!Just to note, I believe this is a Canada find. And an interesting one.
I can only offer general knowledge to form an opinion. The shape is consistent with Paleo and some Archaic forms. But the narrowness of the base stands out to me. Maybe throw a penny down next to the point, or a ruler to give it perspective would help. Hopefully, there is an expert or collector from your region that can help too. If there is a Paleo type that has that very narrow diagnostic, then you may have a type identified as well.
The flaking is random. (Unlike Older's Holland) But that could be due to attrition and resharpening.
Is there grinding in the basal area? This is important to know.
With Paleo Lance types, the basal width (as a general rule) cannot shrink due to attrition. Because the of the concavity. So, assuming the basal width is the only part of the point that can help identify the point, that's where the detective work begins.
Hope to learn from this one.🎓
Just to note, I believe this is a Canada find. And an interesting one.
I can only offer general knowledge to form an opinion. The shape is consistent with Paleo and some Archaic forms. But the narrowness of the base stands out to me. Maybe throw a penny down next to the point, or a ruler to give it perspective would help. Hopefully, there is an expert or collector from your region that can help too. If there is a Paleo type that has that very narrow diagnostic, then you may have a type identified as well.
The flaking is random. (Unlike Older's Holland) But that could be due to attrition and resharpening.
Is there grinding in the basal area? This is important to know.
With Paleo Lance types, the basal width (as a general rule) cannot shrink due to attrition. Because the of the concavity. So, assuming the basal width is the only part of the point that can help identify the point, that's where the detective work begins.
Hope to learn from this one.🎓
Thanks MAMucker for the valuable info. I looked into the points mentioned and I agree that it’s of a very old type. it sounds like this is a bit of a rare find around these parts so I’mNice pictures J!
Again, not my region. But I agree with Lone Star. It has all the Folsom diagnostics. (That is, except for the most important diagnostic; Fluting on both sides). Folsom is an exceptionally rare type, but they have been found from Texas to the Dakotas. So, it's not crazy to think one would end up north of the Decotas.
3/4" total width👍
5/8" basal width (Outside - Ear to Ear)🧐
I still say Narrowness is the key to identifying this point.
Someone from the North-Central region is holding back. Come on guys!