Pet Peeve

OK forgive me if i am wrong but Loco was referring to peoples posts on here not youtube. It seems some on here you have to scoroll down almost a page to see the next reply . Am i not correct Loco ?
yes,, you are correct Gare
 

I can forgive the signature as long as they don't misuse your/you're or there/their/they're. :BangHead:
SNORT

And many overlook the abuse of -that- to often used word THAT. Go through the average document -that- someone writes, whether -that document is- a news article, something -that- a doctor or other wrote and you'll find you can remove a whole lot of wording -that- is unnecessary.

From there, we can go to things like, "have had," versus just saying "had."

And, yes, I find myself guilty of these things when I proof read my work.
 

OK forgive me if i am wrong but Loco was referring to peoples posts on here not youtube. It seems some on here you have to scoroll down almost a page to see the next reply . Am i not correct Loco ?
gotta get yourself a bigger screen Gare! ;)
 

I watch some u- tubes with fast coil swingers, fast talkers, fast walkers and find gold rings fast and I know to get away from that u-tuber and not subscribe REAL FAST !!!!
 

I can forgive the signature as long as they don't misuse your/you're or there/their/they're. :BangHead:
images (6).jpeg
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top